歧口凹陷东北部“包心菜”构造特征及其与油气的关系
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
随着勘探的深入及地震资料品质的提高,在歧口凹陷歧北构造带和沙西裙边带上均识别出一种被称为"包心菜"的构造样式。为了深入剖析两个构造带"包心菜"构造的形成机制和演化过程,并查明其油气富集特点,从构造几何学特征入手,结合地层展布、断层类型和花心迁移特点等方面对其进行了深入研究。结果表明:沙西"包心菜"构造的形成与油气富集特点不同于歧北"包心菜"构造。歧北"包心菜"构造具有晚期形成、晚期成藏的特点,勘探有利层系为中浅层;沙西"包心菜"构造受控于边界正断层的伸展滑脱作用,构造演化经历了早期被动挤压上拱阶段、中期构造稳定热沉降阶段和晚期新构造运动3个阶段,具备两期成藏的条件,但东营组厚层泥岩影响了浅层油气成藏,勘探有利层系为中深层。
With the advance of exploration and development of seismic data quality,we discovered a tectonic style called "cabbage"structure in Qibei and Shaxi tectonic zone of Qikou Sag. Applying the geometric characteristics,stratigraphic distribution,fault type and the migration of flower's centre,we have made clear of the formation mechanism and hydrocarbon enrichment of "cabbage"structure in the two zones. The results show that the "cabbage"structure in Qibei tectonic zone formed in the period of neotectonic movement. Shaxi tectonic zone controlled by extension has experienced three stages,including extrusion uplift,thermal subsidence and neotectonic movement. The difference of tectonic evolution leads to the difference of hydrocarbon accumulation. Qibei tectonic zone has the characteristics of late-stage accumulation. Mid-shallow strata is favorable section. Meanwhile Shaxi tectonic zone has two periods of reservoir-forming,the mid-deep strata is favorable section as the influence of thick shale in Dongying Formation.
引文
[1]陈清华,张福利,王秀玲,等.白东构造带成因分析[J].大地构造与成矿学,2007,31(4):400-403.
    [2]陈福巨,杜旭东.北大港-白东构造带成因的实验解析[J].长春地质学院学报,1997,27(4):397-401.
    [3]赵丽平,张福利.黄骅坳陷白东构造带成因分析[J].断块油气田,2008,15(1):26-27.
    [4]张东东,刘池洋,黄翼坚,等.歧口凹陷“包心菜”构造的形成机制与演化[J].西北大学学报:自然科学版,2012,42(4):623-628.
    [5]李振永,李廷辉,孔凡东,等.黄骅坳陷白东构造带特征及勘探意义[J].石油地球物理勘探,2007,42(2):174-179.
    [6]任建业,廖前进,卢刚臣,等.黄骅坳陷构造变形格局与演化过程分析[J].大地构造与成矿学,2010,34(4):461-472.
    [7]许浚远,张凌云,杨东胜,等.歧口凹陷构造演化[J].石油实验地质,1996,18(4):348-356.
    [8]王芝尧,侯素英,刘志英.歧口凹陷古近纪构造演化及其对油气成藏的影响[J].现代地质,2013,27(3):681-687.
    [9]龚再升,王国纯.渤海新构造运动控制晚期油气成藏[J].石油学报,2001,22(2):1-7.
    [10]龚再升.中国近海含油气盆地新构造运动与油气成藏[J].地球科学:中国地质大学学报,2004,29(5):513-517.
    [11]邓运华.郯庐断裂带新构造运动对渤海东部油气聚集的控制作用[J].中国海上油气,2001,15(5):301-305.
    [12]李大伟.新构造运动与渤海湾盆地上第三系油气成藏[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(2):170-184.
    [13]孙永河,漆家福,吕延防,等.渤中坳陷断裂构造特征及其对油气的控制[J].石油学报,2008,29(5):669-675.
    [14]戴俊生,漆家福,陆克政,等.渤海湾盆地早第三纪构造样式与油气的关系[J].石油大学学报:自然科学版,1998,22(2):1-7.
    [15]郭兴伟,施小斌,丘学林,等.渤海湾盆地新生代沉降特征及其动力学机制探讨[J].大地构造与成矿学,2007,31(3):273-280.
    [16]何书,杨桥,王家鼎.黄骅坳陷中区断裂系统分形研究[J].大地构造与成矿学,2008,32(4):455-461.
    [17]漆家福,邓荣敬,周心怀,等.渤海海域新生代盆地中的郯庐断裂带构造[J].中国科学D辑:地球科学,2008,38(增刊):19-29.
    [18]Hsiao L Y,Graham S A,Tilander N.Seismic reflection in aging of a major strike-slip fault zone in a rift system:Paleogene structure and evolution of the Tan-Lu fault system,Liaodong Bay,Bohai offshore,China[J].AAPG Bulletin,2004,88(1):71-97.
    [19]Schellart W P,Lister G S.The role of East Asian active margin in widespread and strike-slip deformation in East Asia[J].Journal of the Geological Society,2005,162:959-972.
    [20]王光奇,漆家福,岳云福.歧口凹陷及周缘新生代构造的成因和演化[J].地质科学,2003,38(2):230-240.
    [21]郝银全,潘懋,常毓文,等.大港歧口沿岸带第三系构造体系探讨[J].地球学报,2005,26(3):223-228.
    [22]祁鹏,任建业,史双双,等.歧口凹陷沿岸带新生代构造特征及其形成机制[J].石油学报,2010,31(6):900-905.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心