千米桥古潜山岩溶地貌演化及古岩溶洞穴发育特征
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
运用印模法和残厚法以及地震相位追踪对比等古地貌分析法研究揭示,千米桥古潜山岩溶地貌的演化形成先后经历了加里东—海西暴露发育期、印支—燕山暴露改造期、喜马拉雅埋藏定形期等演化阶段。古岩溶洞穴的发育和分布不仅受地貌形态及潜水面的控制,而且与岩性组合、古水文环境及断裂构造密切相关。加里东—海西暴露期地壳的持续抬升和区域潜水面的不断下移,造成古岩溶洞穴的多旋回层状分布,孔洞多被砂泥质充填,有效孔洞保存较少;印支—燕山暴露期发育的古岩溶洞穴受断裂体系影响,分布具有一定随机性,并且多被埋藏期化学半充填,成为目前古潜山油气储层的主要储集空间。利用钻井和测井信息及洞穴充填物,可在生产现场识别古岩溶洞穴的存在及分布,为古潜山油气储层的综合评价提供依据。
By the "moldic" and "residual thickness" methods and the seismic phase tracing and contrasting,the karst paleogeomorphology is analyzed to the Qianmiqiao Buried Hill in Huanghua Depression,Bohaiwan Basin.It is revealed that karst geomorphic of Qianmiqiao buried hill had successively experienced three evolution stages including the exposure and development during Caledonian-Hercynian period,the exposure and reformation during Indosinian-Yanshan period and the sinking,burial and formation during Himalayan period.The development and distribution of palaeokarst caves are not only under control of the geomorphic form and ground water surface,but also are closely related with the lithologic combination,palaeohydrologic environment and fractures.Accompanied with the continuous uplifting of the crust and the unceasingly descending down of regional water table during Caledonian-Hercynian period,palaeokarst caves evolved into multicycle bedded distribution with arenaceous fulling in pores and little available pores preserved.Influenced by fracture system,the palaeokarst caves were distributed with certain randomness and most of pores were partly filled with chemical matters during the Indosinian-Yanshan period.These caves and pores are the present significant reserving spaces for oil and gas in the buried hill.By using drilling and well logging information and cave fillers,the existence and the distribution of the palaeokarst caves may be distinguished,which can provide some information for the comprehensive reservoir evaluation to buried hill reservoirs in oil and gas fields.
引文
[1]华北石油勘探开发研究院.渤海湾地区古潜山油气田[M].北京:石油化学工业出版社,1978:23-34.
    [2]吴永平,杨池银.渤海湾盆地北部奥陶系潜山[M].北京:地质出版社2002:24-155.
    [3]郑聪斌,冀小林,贾疏源,等.陕甘宁盆地中部奥陶系风化壳古岩溶发育特征[J].中国岩溶,1995,14(3):280-288.
    [4]夏日元,唐健生,罗伟权,等.鄂尔多斯盆地奥陶系古岩溶地貌及天然气富集特征[J].石油与天然气地质,1999,20(2):133-135.
    [5]何自新,郑聪斌,陈安宁,等.长庆气田奥陶系古沟槽展布及其对气藏的控制[J].石油学报,2001,22(4):35-38.
    [6]王大纯,张人权,史毅虹,等.水文地质学基础[M].北京:地质出版社,1986,105-115.
    [7]李洪革,杜旭东,陆克政,等.渤海湾地区中西部中生代构造特征及演化[J].石油大学学报:自然科学版,1999,23(3):1-5.
    [8]付立新,杨池银,肖敦清,等.大港千米桥潜山储层形成对油气分布的控制[J].海相油气地质,2007,12(2):33-38.
    [9]郑聪斌,张军,李正宏,等.鄂尔多斯盆地西缘古岩溶洞穴特征[J].2005,25(4):27-30.
    [10]刘传虎.潜山油气藏概念[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2006:49-54.
    [11]刘德良,谈迎,孙先如,等.鄂尔多斯古生界流体包裹体特征及其与油气演化关系[J].沉积学报,2002,20(4):696-704.
    [12]郑聪斌,章贵松,王飞雁,等.鄂尔多斯盆地奥陶系热水岩溶特征[J].沉积学报,2001,19(4):524-529.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心