江陵凹陷荆沙组地层剥蚀厚度恢复探讨
|
摘要
在研究江陵凹陷荆沙组剥蚀面的形成和特点后,根据江陵凹陷断层发育和火成岩分布广泛的地质特征,将镜质体反射率法和地震剖面直观几何比例法相结合,对荆沙组的地层剥蚀厚度进行恢复。用镜质体反射率法对区内单井分析,获得地震剖面直观几何比例法的起算点和约束点,与相交剖面的地层剥蚀厚度闭合,得到其剥蚀量。研究表明,斜坡带、背斜带剥蚀厚度较大;剥蚀作用以南强北弱、西强东弱为特点。
Through study of formation and characteristics of erosion surface of Jingsha Formation in Jiangling Depression,according to the geological features of Jiangling Depression,mature fault and igneous rocks are widely distributed,the eroded strata thickness of Jingsha Formation is recovered:the combination of vitrinite reflectivity method and seismic profiles intuitive geometric scaling method are used.The starting point and the constraint point are obtained by analyzing the single well of the region with vitrinite reflectance method,which is closed with the eroded strata thickness of the intersection profile,to derive the erosion volume.The research shows that the eroded strata thickness of slope belt and anticlinal zone is higher;denudation is characterized by south rather than the north,west rather than east.
Through study of formation and characteristics of erosion surface of Jingsha Formation in Jiangling Depression,according to the geological features of Jiangling Depression,mature fault and igneous rocks are widely distributed,the eroded strata thickness of Jingsha Formation is recovered:the combination of vitrinite reflectivity method and seismic profiles intuitive geometric scaling method are used.The starting point and the constraint point are obtained by analyzing the single well of the region with vitrinite reflectance method,which is closed with the eroded strata thickness of the intersection profile,to derive the erosion volume.The research shows that the eroded strata thickness of slope belt and anticlinal zone is higher;denudation is characterized by south rather than the north,west rather than east.
引文
[1]李伟.恢复地层剥蚀厚度方法综述[J].中国海上油气(地质),1996,10(3):167～171.
[2]王毅,金之钧.沉积盆地中恢复地层剥蚀量的新方法[J].地球科学进展,1999,14(5):482～486.
[3]Bishop R S.Calculated compaction of thick abnormally pressured shales[J].AAPG Bulletin,1979,63(6):918～933.
[4]牟中海,唐勇,崔炳富,等.塔西南地区地层剥蚀厚度恢复研究[J].石油学报,2002,23(1):40～44.
[5]何生,王青玲.关于用镜质体反射率恢复地层剥蚀厚度的问题讨论[J].地质论评,1989,35(2):119～125.
[6]何将启,周祖翼,江兴歌,等.优化孔隙度法计算地层剥蚀厚度:原理及实例[J].石油实验地质,2002,24(6):561～565.
[7]陈增智,柳广弟,郝石生.修正的镜质体反射率剥蚀厚度恢复方法[J].沉积学报,1999,7(1):141～144.
[8]Magara K.Thickness of removed sedimentary rocks,paleoporepressure,and paleotemperature,southwestern part of Western Canadabasin[J].AAPG Bulletin,1976,60:554～566.
[9]真柄钦次.压实与流体运移[M].陈荷立译.北京:石油工业出版社,1981.8～30.
[10]马立祥.利用砂岩孔隙度演化趋势估计古地层剥蚀量的简易方法[J].石油实验地质,1991,13(1):53～55.
[11]刘景彦,林畅松,喻岳钰,等.用声波测井资料计算剥蚀量的方法改进[J].石油实验地质,2000,22(4):302～306.
[12]吴智平,刘继国,张卫海,等.辽河盆地东部凹陷北部地区新老第三纪界面地层剥蚀量研究[J].高校地质学报,2001,37(1):99～106.
[13]胡圣标.利用镜质体反射率数据估算地层剥蚀厚度[J].石油勘探与开发,1999,26(4):42～45.
[14]王震,张明利,王子煜,等.东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷不整合面剥蚀厚度恢复[J].石油实验地质,2005,27(1):90～93.
[15]刘国臣,金之钧,李京昌.沉积盆地沉积-剥蚀过程定量研究的一种新方法——盆地波动分析应用之一[J].沉积学报,1995,13(3):23～31.
[16]Dow W G.Kerogen studies and geological interpretations[J].Journal of Geochemical Exploration,1977,7:79～99.
[17]Katz B J,Phelfer R N,Schunk D J.Interpreation of Discontinuous Vitrinite Reflectance Profiles[J].AAPG Bulletin,1988,72(8):926～931.
[18]Lastett G M,Green P F,Duddy I R,et al.Thermal annealing of fission tracks in apatite:A quantitative analysis[J].ChemicalGeology,1987,73(25):25～38.
[19]周礼成,冯石,王世成.用裂变径迹长度分布模拟地层剥蚀量和热史[J].石油学报,1994,15(3):26～37.
[20]Guidish T M,Kendall,C G ST C,et al.Basin evaluation using burial history calculations:an overview[J].AAPG Bulletin,1985,69(1):92～105.
[21]冯年忠,陈金荣,蒋卫明.江汉盆地江陵凹陷荆沙剥蚀面研究[J].江汉石油科技,2003,(1):1～4.
[22]王敏芳,黄传炎,徐志诚.浅述地层剥蚀量恢复的基本原理与方法[J].海洋石油,2006,26(1):28～29.
[23]王振,张明利.东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷不整合面剥蚀厚度恢复[J].石油实验地质,2005,27(01):4～8.
[24]杨江峰,洪太元,许江桥,等.“趋势分析法”在准格尔盆地腹部地层剥蚀量恢复中的应用[J].中国西部油气地质,2006,2(1):36～37.
[2]王毅,金之钧.沉积盆地中恢复地层剥蚀量的新方法[J].地球科学进展,1999,14(5):482～486.
[3]Bishop R S.Calculated compaction of thick abnormally pressured shales[J].AAPG Bulletin,1979,63(6):918～933.
[4]牟中海,唐勇,崔炳富,等.塔西南地区地层剥蚀厚度恢复研究[J].石油学报,2002,23(1):40～44.
[5]何生,王青玲.关于用镜质体反射率恢复地层剥蚀厚度的问题讨论[J].地质论评,1989,35(2):119～125.
[6]何将启,周祖翼,江兴歌,等.优化孔隙度法计算地层剥蚀厚度:原理及实例[J].石油实验地质,2002,24(6):561～565.
[7]陈增智,柳广弟,郝石生.修正的镜质体反射率剥蚀厚度恢复方法[J].沉积学报,1999,7(1):141～144.
[8]Magara K.Thickness of removed sedimentary rocks,paleoporepressure,and paleotemperature,southwestern part of Western Canadabasin[J].AAPG Bulletin,1976,60:554～566.
[9]真柄钦次.压实与流体运移[M].陈荷立译.北京:石油工业出版社,1981.8～30.
[10]马立祥.利用砂岩孔隙度演化趋势估计古地层剥蚀量的简易方法[J].石油实验地质,1991,13(1):53～55.
[11]刘景彦,林畅松,喻岳钰,等.用声波测井资料计算剥蚀量的方法改进[J].石油实验地质,2000,22(4):302～306.
[12]吴智平,刘继国,张卫海,等.辽河盆地东部凹陷北部地区新老第三纪界面地层剥蚀量研究[J].高校地质学报,2001,37(1):99～106.
[13]胡圣标.利用镜质体反射率数据估算地层剥蚀厚度[J].石油勘探与开发,1999,26(4):42～45.
[14]王震,张明利,王子煜,等.东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷不整合面剥蚀厚度恢复[J].石油实验地质,2005,27(1):90～93.
[15]刘国臣,金之钧,李京昌.沉积盆地沉积-剥蚀过程定量研究的一种新方法——盆地波动分析应用之一[J].沉积学报,1995,13(3):23～31.
[16]Dow W G.Kerogen studies and geological interpretations[J].Journal of Geochemical Exploration,1977,7:79～99.
[17]Katz B J,Phelfer R N,Schunk D J.Interpreation of Discontinuous Vitrinite Reflectance Profiles[J].AAPG Bulletin,1988,72(8):926～931.
[18]Lastett G M,Green P F,Duddy I R,et al.Thermal annealing of fission tracks in apatite:A quantitative analysis[J].ChemicalGeology,1987,73(25):25～38.
[19]周礼成,冯石,王世成.用裂变径迹长度分布模拟地层剥蚀量和热史[J].石油学报,1994,15(3):26～37.
[20]Guidish T M,Kendall,C G ST C,et al.Basin evaluation using burial history calculations:an overview[J].AAPG Bulletin,1985,69(1):92～105.
[21]冯年忠,陈金荣,蒋卫明.江汉盆地江陵凹陷荆沙剥蚀面研究[J].江汉石油科技,2003,(1):1～4.
[22]王敏芳,黄传炎,徐志诚.浅述地层剥蚀量恢复的基本原理与方法[J].海洋石油,2006,26(1):28～29.
[23]王振,张明利.东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷不整合面剥蚀厚度恢复[J].石油实验地质,2005,27(01):4～8.
[24]杨江峰,洪太元,许江桥,等.“趋势分析法”在准格尔盆地腹部地层剥蚀量恢复中的应用[J].中国西部油气地质,2006,2(1):36～37.
版权所有：© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心