华池-庆阳地区延长组长6-长7油层组浊积岩特征及成因

英文篇名：Characteristics and genesis of turbidite of Chang 6 and Chang 7 oil reservoirs in Huachi-Qingyang area of Ordos Basin,China
中文刊名：成都理工大学学报(自然科学版)
英文刊名：Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition)
作者：张海峰 ; 田景春 ; 张涛 ; 王峰 ; 张锦泉
英文作者：ZHANG Hai-feng1 ; 2 ; TIAN Jing-chun3 ; ZHANG Tao4 ; WANG Feng3 ; ZHANG Jin-quan3 1.Research Institute of Exploration and Development of Changqing Oil Field Company ; Xi'an 710018 ; China ; 2.State Engineering Laboratory for Exploration and Development of Low-Permeability Oil & Gas Fields ; Xi'an 710018 ; China ; 3.State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation ; Chengdu University of Technology ; Chengdu 610059 ; China ; 4.Exploration Department of Changqing Oilfield Company ; Xi'an 710021 ; China
中文关键词：鄂尔多斯盆地 ; 华池-庆阳地区 ; 长6-长7油层组 ; 浊积岩 ; 成因
英文关键词：Ordos Basin ; Huachi-Qingyang district ; Yanchang Formation ; turbidite ; genesis
出版日期：2012-06-15
机构：中国石油长庆油田勘探开发研究院低渗透油气田勘探开发国家工程实验室;油气藏地质与开发工程国家重点实验室(成都理工大学);中国石油长庆油田公司勘探部;
年：2012
期：03
出版单位：成都理工大学学报(自然科学版)

摘要

利用钻井岩心、测井及地震资料,对鄂尔多斯盆地华池-庆阳地区三叠系延长组长6-长7油层组沉积过程中所发育的浊积岩特征及成因进行了系统深入的研究。其特征主要表现为:底铸型构造普遍发育,复理石韵律明显,具有典型的鲍马序列,粒度分布平行于C=M基线,萨胡判别值平均为7.357;同时,根据沉积背景的差异,将研究区浊积岩划分为来源于东北缓坡背景三角洲前缘的浊积岩及来源于南部、西南部陡坡背景三角洲前缘的浊积岩两种成因类型。在上述研究基础上,比较了两类浊积岩在成因机制、发育规模、砂体形态、岩相特征等方面的差异,并建立了不同沉积背景下的浊积岩成因模式。
The paper uses the data of drilling cores,logging and seism in study area to research the turbidite features in detail developed during the deposition of Member 6 and Member 7 of the Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation(Chang 6 and Chang 7) oil reservoirs in the Huachi-Qingyang area of Ordos Basin in China.The features include the bottom cast general development,the obvious flysch rhythms,the typical Bouma sequence,size distribution of paralleling to the C=M baseline,and the Sahu discrimination value of 7.357.According to the different provenances,the turbidite types are classified as two types:(1) one comes from the northeast gentle slope delta front;(2) another comes from the south and southwest steep slope delta front.Furthermore,based on the above,the paper compares the differences between the two types of turbidite in formation mechanism,size,sand body morphology and litho facies and establishes the genetic model of the turbidite under different depositional settings.

引文

[1]夏青松,田景春.鄂尔多斯盆地西南部上三叠统长6油层组湖底扇特征[J].古地理学报,2007,9(1):33-43.
    [2]王琪,禚喜准,陈国俊,等.鄂尔多斯西部长6砂岩成岩演化与优质储层[J].石油学报,2005,26(5):17-23.
    [3]田亚铭,施泽进,宋江海,等.宜川-旬邑地区长6～长8油层组成岩作用特征[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版,2011,33(4):44-52.
    [4]傅强,吕苗苗,刘永斗.鄂尔多斯盆地晚三叠世湖盆浊积岩发育特征及地质意义[J].沉积学报,2008,26(2):186-192.
    [5]郑荣才,文华国,韩永林,等.鄂尔多斯盆地白豹地区长6油层组湖底滑塌浊积扇沉积特征及其研究意义[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2006,33(6):566-575.
    [6]杨华,张文正.论鄂尔多斯盆地长7段优质油源岩在低渗透油气成藏富集中的主导作用地质地球化学特征[J].地球化学,2005,34(2):147-154.
    [7]黄智辉.地球物理测井资料在分析沉积环境中的应用[M].北京:地质出版社,1986:46-57.
    [8]刘昊伟,郑兴远,陈全红,等.华庆地区长6深水沉积低渗透砂岩储层特征[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版,2010,32(1):21-26.
    [9]李凤杰,王多云,宋广寿,等.陕甘宁盆地坳陷型湖盆缓坡带三角洲前缘短期基准面旋回与储层成因分析[J].沉积学报,2004,21(1):73-78.
    [10]李凤杰,王多云,郑希民,等.陕甘宁盆地华池地区延长组缓坡带三角洲前缘的微相构成[J].沉积学报,2002,20(4):582-587.
    [11]Shanmugam G.High-density turbidity currents:are they sandy debrisflows?[J].Journal of Sedimenta-ry Research,1996,66:2-10.
    [12]Shanmugam G.50years of the turbidite paradigm(1950-1990s):deep-water processes and facies models-a critical perspective[J].Marine and Petro-leum Geology,2000,17:285-342.