堰塞坝的形成机理与溃决风险
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
基于多座溃决堰塞坝案例的调查,对堰塞坝的形成机制、溃决风险及其影响因素进行分析总结,认为堰塞坝主要是由地震或降雨或火山喷发引起的山体滑坡、崩塌、泥石流所形成,形成方式可概括为滑坡、崩塌、泥石流以及碎屑流,其中滑坡是形成堰塞坝最主要的形式。堰塞坝的工作条件、坝体几何特征以及坝体物质组成和内部结构都与人工土石坝存在明显差别,其溃决的可能性远高于人工土石坝。指出堰塞坝的溃决风险主要取决于上游来水量、坝的拦蓄水量、坝的几何尺寸和坝的结构与物质组成,并讨论了降低堰塞坝溃决风险的应对措施。鉴于堰塞坝极高的溃决可能性与严重的致灾后果,建议今后加强堰塞坝溃决机理、溃坝过程的试验与数值模拟研究工作,提出能合理反映堰塞坝溃口发展规律、溃坝洪水流量过程的数值模型与相应计算方法,为科学预测堰塞坝溃决致灾后果,制定堰塞坝溃决应急预案提供技术支撑。
Based on the investigation of several broken barrier dams,the formation mechanism,breaching failure risk and impact factors were analyzed.The barrier dams were regarded to be formed by landslides,collapses and debris flows caused by earthquakes,rainfall or volcanic eruption.The modes of formation of barrier dams could be categorized into those by landslides,collapses,debris flows and clastic flows,among which the mode of formation aroused by the landslides should the uppermost.There were obvious differences in the working conditions,characteristics of dam and substance composition,and internal structures between barrier dams and artificial earth-rock dams.The breaching failure risk of the former was much higher than that of the latter and mainly depended on the upstream flows,water storage,geometrical sizes as well as structure and composition of materials.The countermeasures for the reduction of the breaching failure risk were discussed.In view of great possibility of dam break and serious catastrophic consequences,it was suggested that the studies on the failure mechanism and the experiments on the process of the dam breach should be strengthened,and reasonable numerical models and evaluation approaches for the process of breach development and flood discharge should be proposed so as to evaluate the consequences due to dam break and to provide technical support for emergency plans of barrier dams.
引文
[1]严祖文,魏迎奇,蔡红.堰塞坝形成机理及稳定性分析[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2009,20(4):55-59.
    [2]聂高众,高建国,邓砚.地震诱发的堰塞湖初步研究[J].第四纪研究,2004,24(3):293-300.
    [3]COSTA J E,SCHUSTER R L.The formation and failure ofnatural dams[J].Geological Society of America Bulletin,1988,100(7):1054-1068.
    [4]张世殊,杨建,巩满福,等.汶川地震堰塞湖分布规律初步研究[M].成都:四川科学技术出版社,2008.
    [5]孙其诚,王光谦,胡凯衡.汶川地震堰塞体及相关力学问题[J].物理,2009(4):248-253.
    [6]王兰生,杨立铮,李天斌,等.四川岷江叠溪较场地震滑坡及环境保护[J].地质灾害与环境保护,2000,11(3):195-199.
    [7]李忠生.地震作用下滑坡稳定性研究[D].西安:长安大学,2001.
    [8]黄润秋.汶川8.0级地震触发崩滑灾害机制及其地质力学模式[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2009,28(6):1239-1249.
    [9]程谦恭,彭建兵,胡广韬.高速岩质滑坡动力学[M].成都:西南交通大学出版社,1999.
    [10]徐文杰,陈祖煜,何秉顺,等.肖家桥滑坡堵江机制及灾害链效应研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2010,29(5):933-942.
    [11]何秉顺,丁留谦,王玉杰,等.四川安县肖家桥堰塞湖稳定性初步评估[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2009,28(S2):3626-3631.
    [12]赵允辉.危岩崩塌地质灾害调查评价与防治[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2004,15(增刊):332-338.
    [13]孔纪名,阿发友,吴文平.汶川地震滑坡类型及典型实例分析[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(6):66-70.
    [14]张梁,张业成,罗元华.地质灾害灾情评估理论与实践[M].北京:地质出版社,1998.
    [15]葛永刚,陈兴长,方华,等.汉源县大渡河“8.6”崩塌堵河灾害研究[J].山地学报,2010,28(1):123-128.
    [16]王滨,王维早,于开宁,等.平山县泥石流的形成特征和机理分析[J].地质灾害与环境保护,2008,19(4):59-62.
    [17]胡凯衡,葛永刚,崔鹏,等.对甘肃舟曲特大泥石流灾害的初步认识[J].山地学报,2010,28(5):628-634.
    [18]唐川,梁京涛.汶川震区北川9.24暴雨泥石流特征研究[J].工程地质学报,2008,16(6):751-758.
    [19]JOHNSON A M,RODINE J R,RODINE J R.Debris flow inslope instability[M].New York:John Viley,1984:257-361.
    [20]贺可强,安振远.崩滑碎屑流的形成条件与形成类型[J].河北地质学院学报,1996,19(4):345-351.
    [21]吕杰堂,王治华,周成虎.西藏易贡大滑坡成因探讨[J].地球科学:中国地质大学学报,2003,28:107-110.
    [22]SCHUSTER R L,COSTA J E.A perspective on landslide dams[C]//ASCE,Lands1ide Dams:Processes,Risk,andMitigation,Geotechnical Special Publication.New York:Geolechical,1986:1-20.
    [23]ERMINI L,CASSGLI N.Prediction of the behaviour of landslidedams using a geomorphological dimensionless index[J].EarthSurface Processes and Landforms,2003,28(1):31-47.
    [24]陈晓清,崔鹏,程尊兰,等.5.12汶川地震堰塞湖危险性应急评估[J].地学前缘,2008,15(4):244-249.
    [25]谢作涛,陈肃利.唐家山堰塞坝溃坝可能性及冲刷形式初步分析[J].人民长江,2008,39(22):71-72.
    [26]王光谦,钟德钰,张红武,等.汶川地震唐家山堰塞湖泄流过程的数值模拟[J].科学通报,2008,53(24):3127-3133.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心