利用零井源距VSP资料进行品质因子反演

英文篇名：Q-factor inversion and calculation using zero-offset VSP data
中文刊名：石油地球物理勘探
英文刊名：Oil Geophysical Prospecting
作者：张大伟 ; 孙赞东 ; 王学军 ; 邹雯 ; 冯晓燕 ; 路遥
英文作者：Zhang Da-wei1 ; 2 ; Sun Zan-dong1 ; 3 and Wang Xue-jun2 ; Zou Wen2 ; Feng Xiao-yan4 ; Lu Yao5.1.Lab for Integration of Geology and Geophysics ; China University of Petroleum(Beijing) ; Beijing ; 102249 ; China2.Geophysical Research Institute ; BGP Inc. ; CNPC ; Zhuozhou ; Hebei ; 072751 ; China3.State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting ; China University of Petroleum(Beijing) ; Beijing ; 102249 ; China4.Petroleum Geophysical Exploration School ; BGP Inc. ; CNPC ; Zhuozhou ; Hebei ; 072751 ; China5.School of Geosciences ; Yangtze Univevsity ; Jingzhou ; Hubei ; 434023 ; Chin
中文关键词：品质因子 ; VSP ; 质心频移法 ; 谱比法
英文关键词：Q-factor ; VSP ; Controid frequency shift ; spetral ratio method
出版日期：2011-11-30
机构：中国石油大学(北京)地质地球物理综合研究中心;东方地球物理公司研究院;中国石油大学(北京)油气资源与探测国家重点实验室;东方地球物理公司物探职业教育学校;长江大学地球科学学院;
年：2011
期：S1
出版单位：石油地球物理勘探

摘要

品质因子Q值是描述地震波衰减的一个重要物理参数,它描述了介质非完全弹性特征,是地层内部本质特征,所以研究和估算Q值在地震勘探中的作用越来越重要。谱比法和质心频移法是现在常用的两种方法。本文详细介绍了两种方法的原理并用无噪声理论模型验证了两种方法的可行性。反演结果显示在无噪声的条件下两种方法都能很好地估算介质的品质因子。通过对含有不同强度噪声的理论数据、全波场理论数据和实际零井源距VSP数据的处理,对两种方法进行了比较。结果表明,质心频移法反演的结果比谱比法更精确、更可信。
Q-factor,which describes the seismic attenuation and the viscoelasticity of the formation,is an important physical parameter depicting seismic wave propagation.Therefore,Q-factor plays a significant role in high resolution seismic prospecting.Spectral ratio method(SRM) and centroid frequency shift(CFS) method are the most popular.In this paper,the concepts of the two methods are introduced first.Then the feasibility is tested by synthetic data.The inversion results show that both the two methods perform well while there is no noise in the inputs.Finally,stability of the two methods is verified by noised synthetic data,synthetic data of full wavefield and field zero-offset VSP data respectively,the results suggest that CFS is more reliable than SRM.

引文

[1]高静怀,杨森林,王大兴.利用VSP资料直达波的包络峰值处瞬时频率提取介质品质因子.地球物理学报,2008,51(3):853～861Gao Jing-huai,Yang Sen-lin,Wang Da-xing.Qualityfactor extraction using instantaneous frequency at en-velope peak of direct waves of VSP data.Chinese Jour-nal of Geophysics,2008,51(3):853～861
    [2]Tonn R.Comparison of seven methods for the compu-tation of Q.Physics of the Earth and Planetary Inte-riors,1989,55(3～4):259～268
    [3]马昭军.地震波衰减反演研究综述.地球物理学进展,2005,20(4):1074～1081Ma Zhao-jun.A summary of research on seismic atten-uation.Progress in Geophysics,2005,20(4):1074～1081
    [4]Hauge P.Measurements of attenuation from verticalseismic profiles.Geophysics,1981,46(11):1548～1558
    [5]Wang Yang-hua.Quantifying the effectiveness of stabi-lized inverse Q filtering.Geophysics,2003,68(1):337～345
    [6]Wang Yang-hua.Inverse Q-filter for seismic resolutionenhancement.Geophysics,2006,71(3):51～60
    [7]Quan You-li et al.Seismic attenuation tomographybased on centroid frequency shift.SEG Technical Pro-gram Expanded Abstracts,1993,12:41～44
    [8]Quan You-li et al.Seismic attenuation tomography u-sing the frequency shift method.Geophysics,1997,62(3):895～905
    [9]Ward R W,Tokz M N.Causes of regional variation ofmagnitude.The Bulletin of the Seismological Societyof America,1971,61(3):649～670