断裂输导流体的机制及输导形式探讨
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
张性正断层断裂带一般具有二分结构,即断层核和破裂带,断层核伴生裂缝、连通孔隙及破裂带诱导裂缝均可作为输导流体的通道。断裂活动具有幕式的特征,一次活动周期可以分为活动期、活动—间歇过渡期和间歇期3个阶段,断裂活动期以伴生裂缝为优势输导通道,一般以"地震泵"控制下的幕式运移机制为主;活动间歇期输导能力较弱,通道为连通孔隙,遵循浮力控制下的缓慢渗流机制;而活动—间歇过渡期兼具有活动期和间歇期的部分特征,主要输导通道为破裂带诱导裂缝。断裂输导具有3个方向的运移分量,即沿断裂纵向方向、沿断裂走向方向和横穿断层面方向,与此相对应,目前断裂输导形式分为"2型4类",包括沿断层面输导和横穿断层面输导两大类型,其中,沿断层面输导型又可分为沿断裂纵向向上输导、沿断裂走向输导和沿断裂向下"倒灌"式输导3类。沿断裂纵向向上输导是目前最重要的断裂输导形式,进一步分为3种亚类,即线性输导、"Y"形输导和似花状输导,似花状输导所占比例最大。具体的输导形式及方向取决于活动时期断裂与两侧地层的配置关系及多种运移动力、阻力的矢量合。
Tensional normal fault is generally consist of fault core and damaged zone, fault core associated with fractures, connected pores and the induced fractures of damaged zone can be used as a channel for fluid conduit. The fault activity has episodic feature, and a cycle of faulting can be divided into three stages, active period, active—intermitient trandition period and intermitient period, the advantage conduit channel is associated with fractures in faulting period, generally, the main conduit mechanism is episodic migration under the control of the "seismic pumping"; the conduit capacity in intermitient period is weak, and the channel is connected to pores, following the slowly seepage mechanism under the control of buoyancy; active—intermitient trandition period has some characteristics of active period and intermitient period, and the conduit channel is the induced fractures of damage zone. The fault conduit has three directions of migration component, vertical direction along fault, strike direction along fault and across the direction of the fault plane, correspondingly, current fault conduit divide into "two types and four kinds", including conduit along the fault plane and conduit across the fault plane, which the type of conduit along the fault plane can be also divided into three kinds, they are vertical upward conduit along the fault, conduit along the fault strike and "reversed" conduit along the fault. The type of vertical upward conduit along the fault is the most important form of fault conduit, which can be further divided into three sub-kinds, namely the linear conduit, "Y"-type conduit and like flower-shaped conduit, the largest proportion is like flower-shaped conduit. The specific conduit form and direction depends on the configuration of the fault and both sides of the formation in faulting and sum of vector of multiple migration force, resistance.
引文
吕延防,付广,孙永河,胡明,刘哲,孙同文.2011.南堡凹陷第三系断裂系统划分及输导和封闭性评价.黑龙江大庆:东北石油大学内部报告,7~26.
    霍秋立,彭威,李敏.2002.海拉尔盆地油藏地球化学研究.黑龙江大庆:大庆油田有限责任公司勘探开发研究院内部报告,1~132.
    陈欢庆,朱筱敏,张琴,张喜林,张亚雄,李烨.2009.输导体系研究进展.地质论评,55(2):269~276.
    陈伟,吴智平,侯峰,李伟,侯旭波.2010.油气沿断裂走向运移研究.中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),34(6):25~30.
    迟元林,萧德铭,殷进垠.2000.松辽盆地三肇地区上生下储“注入式”成藏机制.地质学报,4(4):371~377.
    戴金星,钟宁宁,刘德汉.2000.中国煤成大中型气田的形成条件.北京:石油工业出版社,50~77.
    段毅,吴保祥,张辉,郑朝阳,王传远.2006.鄂尔多斯盆地西峰油田原油地球化学特征及其成因.地质学报,80(2):301~310.
    杜春国,郝芳,邹华,张树林,付晓飞.2007.断裂输导体系研究现状及存在的问题.地质科技情报,26(1):51~56.
    付广,薛永超,付晓飞.2001.油气运移输导系统及其对成藏的控制.新疆石油地质,22(1):24~26.
    付广,王国民,黄劲松.2008a.断裂静止期有无输导油气能力的判别方法.沉积学报,26(5):851~856.
    付广,王有功.2008b.三肇凹陷青山口组源岩生成油向下“倒灌”运移层位及其研究意义.沉积学报,26(2):355~360.
    付广,王有功,袁大伟.2010.三肇凹陷扶杨油层源断裂的再认识及其对成藏的控制作用.石油学报,31(5):762~773.
    付晓飞,方德庆,吕延防,付广,孙永河.2005.从断裂带内部结构出发评价断层垂向封闭性的方法.地球科学,30(3):328~336.
    付晓飞,平贵东,范瑞东,刘宗堡.2009.三肇凹陷扶杨油层油气“倒灌”运聚成藏规律研究.沉积学报,27(3):558~566.
    付晓飞,李文龙,吕延防,贺向阳,刘哲.2011.断层侧向封闭性及对断油水关系的控制.地质论评,57(3):387~397.
    郭凯,曾溅辉,卢学军,崔周旗,师玉雷.2010.断层纵向输导与储层非均质性耦合控运模拟实验研究.现代地质,24(6):1164~1170.
    华保钦.1995.构造应力场、地震泵和油气运移.沉积学报,3(2):77~85.
    侯启军,冯子辉,霍秋立.2004.海拉尔盆地乌尔逊凹陷石油运移模式与成藏期.地球科学,29(4):397~403.
    郝芳,邹华耀,方勇.2004.断—压双控流体流动与油气幕式快速成藏.石油学报,25(6):38~47.
    郝芳,郭华耀,曾溅辉.2005.超压盆地生烃作用动力学与油气成藏机理.北京:科学出版社,175~239.
    姜振学,庞雄奇,曾溅辉,王洪玉,罗群.2005.油气优势运移通道的类型及其物理模拟实验研究.地学前缘,12(4):505~515.
    罗群,白新华.1998.断裂控烃理论与实践.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,6~33.
    罗群,姜振学,庞雄奇.2007.断裂控藏机理与模式.北京:石油工业出版社,1~13.
    罗群,宋子学.2008.油气沿断裂向下幕式运移的机理.新疆石油地质,29(2):170~172.
    李明诚.2004.石油与天然气运移(第三版).北京:石油工业出版社,143~146.
    吕延防,付广,张云峰,王朋岩,付晓飞,杨勉.2002.断层封闭性研究.北京:石油工业出版社,66~75.
    吕延防,李建民,付晓飞,付广,王有功,玄昌姬.2009.松辽盆地三肇凹陷油气下排的地质条件及找油方向.地质科学,44(2):525~533.
    刘泽容,信荃麟,邓俊国.1998.断块群油气藏形成机制和构造模式.北京:石油工业出版社,61~92.
    刘桠颖,徐怀民,姚卫江,刘楼军.2011.准噶尔盆地网毯式油气成藏输导体系.中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),35(5):32~36.
    苗顺德,曾溅辉,李秋芬.2007.复合反“Y”字型构造中油气二次运移与聚集过程物理模拟研究,29(6):18~20.
    庞雄奇,金之钧,姜振学.2003.油气成藏定量模式.北京:石油工业出版社,129~144.
    宋胜浩.2006.从断裂带内部结构剖析油气沿断层运移规律.大庆石油学院学报,30(3):17~20.
    孙英杰.2004.乌尔逊凹陷油气成藏机制及主控因素研究.黑龙江大庆:大庆石油学院博士学位论文,95~100.
    孙永河.2005.逆断层输导天然气机制及输导效率物理模拟.黑龙江大庆:大庆石油学院硕士学位论文,7~22.
    孙永河,付晓飞,吕延防,付广,阎冬.2007.地震泵抽吸作用与油气运聚成藏物理模拟.吉林大学学报(地球科学版),37(1):98~104.
    孙同文,吕延防,刘宗堡,付晓飞,付广.2011.大庆长垣以东地区扶余油层油气运移与富集.石油勘探与开发,38(6):700~707.
    史建南,郑荣才,冯青平,郑超,陈守春.2009.川东北长兴组埋藏白云石化流体来源与油气倒灌式成藏.天然气工业,29(3):5~8.
    武红岭,张利容.2002.断层周围的弹塑性区及其地质意义.地球学报,23(1):11~16.
    吴智平,陈伟,薛雁.2010.断裂带的结构特征及对油气的输导和封堵性.地质学报,84(4):570~578.
    阎福礼,贾东,卢华复,徐光伟.1999.东营凹陷油气运移的地震泵作用.石油与天然气地质,20(4):295~298.
    于舒杰,徐大光,康冶,陈鹏,吴翠莲.2010.断陷盆地油气运移主要输导体系及其与油气分布的关系.大庆石油学院学报,34(6):18~22.
    赵密福,刘泽容,信荃麟,蔡燕杰.2001.控制油气沿断层纵向运移的地质因素.中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),25(6):21~24.
    曾溅辉,王捷.2002.油气运移机理及物理模拟.北京:石油工业出版社,126~131.
    邹才能,贾承造,赵文智,陶士振,谷志东,侯启军,赵占银,宋立忠.2005.松辽盆地南部岩性—地层油气藏成藏动力和分布规律.石油勘探与开发,32(4):125~130.
    Andrea B.2008.Fault zone architecture and permeability features insiliceous sedimentary rocks:Insights from the Rapolano geothermalarea(Northern Apennines,Italy).Journal of Structural Geology,30:237~256.
    Bruhn R L,Parry W A,Thomoson T,1994.Fracturing andhydrothermal alteration in normal fault zones.Pure Appl.Geophys.,142:609~644.
    Berg S S,Skar T.2005.Controls on damage zone asymmetry of a normalfault zone:outcrop analyses of a segment of the Moab fault,SEUtah.Journal of Structural Geology,27:1803~1822.
    Chapman R E.1982.Effects of oil and gas accumulation on watermovement.AAPG Bulletin,66(3):1~12.
    Caine J S,Evans J P,Forster C B.1996.Fault zone architecture andpermeability structure.Geology,24:1025~1028.
    Flodin E,Aydin A.2004.Faults with asymmetric damage zones insandstone,Valley of Fire State Park,southern Nevada.Journal ofStructural Geology,26:983~988.
    Gray D R,Janssen C,Vapnik Y.1999.Deformation character andpalaeo-fluid flow across a wrench fault within a Palaeozoicsubduction—accretion system:Waratah Fault Zone,southeasternAustralial.J.Struct.Geol.,21:191~214.
    Gudmundsson A.2001.Fluid overpressure and flow in fault zones:field measurements and models.Tectonophysics,336:183~197.
    Gudmundsson A,Berg S,Lyslo K B.2001.Fracture networks and fluidtransport in active fault zone.Journal of Structural Geology,23:343~353.
    Hunt J M.1990.Generation and migration of petroleum from abnormallypressured fluid compartments.AAPG Bulletin,74(1):1~12.
    Hooper E C D.1991.Fluid migration along growth fault in compactingsediments.Journal of Petroleum Geology,14:161~180.
    Hindle A D.1997.Petroleum migration pathways and chargeconcentration:A three-dimensional model.AAPG Bulletin,81(8):1451~1481.
    Sibson R H,Moore G F,Rankin A H.1975.Seimic pumping:Ahydrothermal fluids transport mechanism.Journal of the GeologicalSociety,131:653~659.
    Steven L,Lorraine E,Martin S,James W.1999.Vertical and lateralfluid flow related to a large growth fault,South Eugene Island Block330Field,Offshore Louisiana.AAPG Bulletin,83(2):244~276.
    Welte D H.1997.Petroleum and Basin Evolution.Berlin:Springer,39~55.
    Yehuda Ben-Zion,Charles G S.2003.Characterization of fault zone.In:Yehuda Ben-Zion.ed.Pure and Applied Gcophisics:SeismicWaves and Fault Zone Structure.Berlin:Springer,160:677~715.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心