广义反演方法估算首都圈地区台站场地效应
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
本文利用2001—2006年首都圈地区的SH波数字化地震资料,用广义逆矩阵联合反演的方法得到了63个台站的场地效应值。基岩场地的场地效应比较稳定,在1~10 Hz范围内为1左右;沉积场地在低频场地效应较高,在1~8 Hz范围内在3~7之间,5 Hz左右场地效应有明显的突起,以后随频率增加降低。结果表明,台站岩性是影响场地效应形态和大小的主要因素,此外其场地效应还可能与所处的局部地质构造等因素有关。
Generalized inversion method has been used to estimate the spatial variation of site effects,using the digital data of SH-Waves recorded by 63 stations from 2001 to 2006 in the Capital region of China.It has been found that the site effects of base rock are stable and about 1.0 in the frequency range of 1.0 Hz to 10.0 Hz;while the site effects of deposit are high in the low frequency,about 3~7 from 1.0 Hz to 8.0 Hz and the site effect was protuberant at about 5.0 Hz,then fall as the frequency increases.These results show that the shape and intensity of station site effects are mainly influenced by the lithology below the station and also influenced by local geological conformation.
引文
[1]Hough S E,Lees J M,Monastero F.Attenuation and source properties at the Coso Geothermal areaCalifornia[J].Bull Seism Soc Am,1999,89(6):1 606-1 619.
    [2]Stephen H H.Site response estimation from earthquake data[J].Bull Seism Soc Am,1992,82(6):2 308-2 327.
    [3]Hartzell S H.Site response estimation from the earthquake data[J].Bull Seism Soc Am,1992,82:2 308-2 327.
    [4]Dutta U,Martirosvan A,Biswas N,Papageorgiou A,et al.Estimation of S-wave site response inanchorage,Alaska,from weak motion data using generalized inversion method[J].Bull Seism SocAm,2001,91(2):335-346.
    [5]高文学,马瑾.首都圈地震地质环境与地震灾害[M].北京:地震出版社,1993.
    [6]Chael E.Spectral scaling of earthquakes in the Miramichi region of New Brunswick[J].Bull SeismSoc Am,l987,77(2):347-365.
    [7]徐红玉,陈殿云,杨先健,等.弹性介质中平面SH波通过弹性夹层时的传播特性[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2003,22(2):304-308.
    [8]Field E H,Jacob K H.A comparison and test of various site response techniques,including threethat are non-reference site dependent[J].Bull Seis Soc Am,1995,85:1 127-1 143.
    [9]Kato K,Aki K,Takemura M.Site amplification from coda waves:validation and application to S-wave site response[J].Bull Seism Soc Am,1995,85:467-477.
    [10]Bonilla L F,Steidl J H,Lindley G T,et al.Site amplification in San Fernando Valley,California:variability of site effect estimation using the S-wave.coda,and H/V methods[J].Bull Seism SocAm,1997,87:710-730.
    [11]Atkinson G M,Mereu B F.The shape of ground motion attenuation curves in southeastern Canada[J].Bull Seis Soc Am,1992,82(5):2 014-2 031.
    [12]黄玉龙,郑斯华,刘杰,等.广东地区地震波衰减和场地效应的研究[J].地球物理学报,2003,46(1):54-61.
    [13]Andrews D J.Objective determination of source parameters and similarity of earthquakes of differentsize[A].Earthquake Source Mechanics[C].Das S,Boatwright J,Sholtz C H(Editors)AmericanGeophysical Union,Washington D C,1986:259-268.
    [14]Moya A,Jorge A.Inversion of source parameters and site effects from strong ground motion recordusing genetic algorithms[J].Bull Seism Soc Am,2000,90:977-992.
    [15]Press W H,Teukolsky S A,Vetterling W T,et al.C++数值算法(第二版)[M].胡建伟等译.北京:电子工业出版社,2005.61-73.
    [16]Menke W.Geophysical Data Analysis:Discrete Inverse Theory[M].Academic,New York,1989.58-80.
    [17]Shearer P H.地震学导论[M].陈章立译.北京:地震出版社,2008.78-91.
    [18]徐锡伟,吴卫民,张先康,等.首都圈地区地壳最新构造变动与地震[M].北京:科学出版社,2002.291-292.
    [19]王世杰,继宏兵,欧阳自远,等.碳酸盐岩风化成土作用的初步研究[J].中国科学(D辑):1999,29(5):441-449.
    [20]嘉世旭,齐诚,王夫运,等.首都圈地壳网格化三维结构[J].地球物理学报,2005,48(6):1 316-1 324.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心