北京地区大灰厂井与五里营井氦气观测资料的对比分析

详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文

英文篇名：Contrast on Helium Gas Observation Data of Dahuichang Well and Wuliying Well in Beijing 中文刊名：山西地震 英文刊名：Earthquake Research in Shanxi 作者：武晓东 ; 王志惠 ; 朱石军 英文作者：WU Xiao-dong ; WANG Zhi-hui ; ZHU Shi-jun(Yanqing Seismological Station of Beijing Earthquake Administration ; Beijing 102100 ; China) 中文关键词：大灰厂井 ; 五里营井 ; 氦气观测 ; 日变形态 英文关键词：Dahuichang well ; Wuliying well ; Helium gas observation ; daily variation shape 出版日期：2012-01-15 机构：北京市地震局延庆地震台; 年：2012 期：01 出版单位：山西地震

摘要

对比分析了北京市地震局丰台大灰厂井和延庆五里营井的氦气观测资料,发现由于井水深度、井水类型和水温的不同,丰台大灰厂井氦气含量明显低于延庆五里营井的氦气含量;两口井氦气年变都是冬高夏低;日变形态基本一致,都表现为一峰一谷的形态;两口井氦气含量与观测环境温度负相关。
Helium gas observations of Dahuichang well at Fengtai and Wuliying well at Yanqing of Beijing earthquake administration are contrasted and analyzed.It is found that Helium gas content of Dahuichang well at Fengtai is obviously lower than that of Wuliying well at Yanqing because of the difference of depth of well water,type of well water and water temperature.Annual variation of Helium gas of the two wells are both high in winter and low in summer.Daily variation shapes are basically consistent and both have the shape of a peak and a valley.Helium gas content of two wells are both correlative negatively with their observation circumstance around.

引文

[1]孔令昌.观测井中氦含量异常与地震关系的研究[J].地震地磁观测与研究,2007,28(6):32-33.
    [2]中国地震局监测预报司.地震地下流体理论基础与观测技术[M].北京:地震出版社,1995,8(3):199-200.