通南巴地区地层剥蚀时间及剥蚀厚度研究
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
剥蚀厚度和高强度剥蚀时期的确定对烃源岩生烃模拟和成熟演化影响较大,依据测井、地震及实验测试资料对川东北通南巴地区剥蚀厚度和剥蚀时刻进行研究.结果表明:在晚白垩世末期川东北地区开始隆升剥蚀的时间为距今75 Ma;晚白垩时期燕山-喜山隆升运动致使研究区侏罗系和白垩系地层存在大面积高强度的剥蚀,在平面上剥蚀强度差异较大,剥蚀厚度一般为700~6 000 m,总体上看呈北东强,南西弱的特征;盆地边缘的米仓山、大巴山隆起地区剥蚀强度最大,达到了6 000 m,而在盆地内部的通南巴及龙4井背斜带剥蚀强度次之,剥蚀量为250~3 000 m,而在盆地内部剑阁、苍溪、川复56井等的洼陷区则剥蚀相对弱些,剥蚀量一般为700~1 500 m.
The determination of the important erosion time and thickness has a great influence to hydrocarbon source rock evolution and hydrocarbon generation. According to seismic,logging,and laboratory test data,the erosion time and erosion thickness of the Northeast Sichuan Tongnanba area were researched. The results show that the start uplift erosion time in the late Cretaceous of the Northeast Sichuan Basin is about 75 Ma. Because of the Yanshanian-Himalayan uplifted movements in Late Cretaceous,the stratum of Jurassic and Cretaceous of the large area in the basin have a high strength missing. The erosion intensity is different in the plane and the erosion thickness is 700 ~ 6 000 m. The erosion thickness is large in the northeastern area and small in the Southwestern area. The erosion thickness of Micangshan and Dabashan uplift in the margin of the basin is maximum and achieves 6 000 m,whereas that of the Tongnanba and Dragon Well 4 anticline belt in the interior of the basin is medium and achieves 250 ~ 3 000 m. While in Jiange,Cangxi,Chuanfu Well 56 subsag area,the erosion is relatively weak and achieves 700 ~ 1 500 m.
引文
[1]李伟.恢复地层剥蚀厚度方法综述[J].中国海上油气(地质),1996,10(3):167-171.
    [2]陈拥锋,张渝昌,江兴歌.构造趋势法计算剥蚀量的计算机实现[J].江苏地质,2007,31(4):344-347.
    [3]姜素华,李金山,夏冬明,等.剥蚀厚度恢复法在渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷孔店组应用[J].中国海洋大学学报,2011,41(4):97-102.
    [4]张小兵,张哨楠,赵锡奎,等.应用地震地层综合法计算叠合盆剥蚀厚度:以塔里木盆地阿克库勒凸起为例[J].新疆石油地质,2007,28(3):366-368.
    [5]张志诚,王雪松.裂变径迹定年资料应用中的问题及其地质意义[J].北京大学学报:自然科学版,2004,40(6):898-905.
    [6]李坤,赵锡奎,沈忠民,等.“趋势厚度法”在塔里木盆地阿克勒凸起地层剥蚀量恢复中的应用[J]物探化探计算技术,2007,29(5):415-419.
    [7]杨江峰,洪太元,许江桥,等.“趋势分析法”在准噶尔盆地腹地层剥蚀量恢复中的应用[J].中国西部油气地质,2006,2(1):83-86.
    [8]佟彦明,宋立军,曾少军,等.利用镜质体反射率恢复地层剥蚀厚度的新方法[J].古地理学报,2005,7(3):417-423.
    [9]MAGARA K.Thickness of removed sediments,paleopore pressure and paleotemperature,southwestern part of western Canada Basin[J].AAPGBulletin,1976,60:54-65.
    [10]陈瑞银,罗晓容,陈占坤,等.鄂尔多斯盆地中生代地层剥蚀量估算及其地质意义[J].地质学报,2006,80(5):685-692.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心