金湖凹陷西斜坡阜宁组灰岩段成因机理
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
金湖凹陷古近系灰岩段是重要的油气产层,但灰岩段沉积特征和成因机理认识不清,给油气储层预测带来困难。通过岩心资料、地震资料和测井资料的综合分析认为研究区灰岩段为混合沉积,有别于中国东部其他盆地古近系混积岩。金湖凹陷灰岩段沉积相类型包括湖泊相、三角洲相和湖底扇相,其中湖泊相是主要的沉积相类型。三角洲相和湖底扇相受断层和物源的控制,主要分布在靠近物源的区域。自下而上,灰岩段中碎屑岩的含量逐渐减少,表明湖侵的规模逐渐扩大,因此灰岩段形成于湖侵期。灰岩段沉积期研究区广布的同沉积断层是碎屑沉积物运输的通道,对碎屑岩的分布具有调节作用。同时,碎屑岩的填平补齐及物源的改道使地势变得平坦、水体变得清澈,因此生物灰岩常分布于碎屑岩的上部,且灰岩中不含有碎屑岩。总之,物源和同沉积断层是研究区灰岩段混合沉积的主要控制因素。
The Paleogene limestone member in the Jinhu Sag is an important petroleum producing formation.However,the depositional features and forming mechanism of the limestone member are not clear,which brings difficulty for the forecast of reservoir. Different from peperites in other Paleogene basins in East China,the limestone member in the Jinhu Sag is the mixture of siliciclastic-carbonate sediments,based on the comprehensive analysis of core,seismic and logging data. The limestone member is mainly of lake,delta and lacustrine fan facies,among which the lake facies is dominant. The delta and lacustrine fan facies,controlled by faults and provenance,mainly distribute close to sediment sources. Clastic rock content decreases upwards in the limestone member,indicating the expansion of transgression,during which the limestone member was deposited. During the deposition of the limestone member,widespread syn-sedimentary faults served as the channels for sediment migration,and adjusted clastic rock distribution. Additionally, clastic rock deposition and provenance rechanneling made the terrain flat and water clear. As a result,biolithite limestones cover clastic rocks and there are no clastic rocks in the limestone. Provenance and faults are the main controlling factors for the limestone member in the study area.
引文
[1]张金亮,司学强.断陷湖盆碳酸盐与陆源碎屑混合沉积:以东营凹陷金家地区古近系沙河街组第四段上亚段为例[J].地质论评,2007,53(4):448-453.Zhang Jinliang,Si Xueqiang.Mixed siliciclastic-carbonate sediment in rift lacustrine basin:a case on the Upper Part of the Fourth Member of the Eogene Shahejie Formation in Jinjia area,Dongying Depression[J].Geological Review,2007,53(4):448-453.
    [2]曾德铭,赵敏,石新,等.黄骅坳陷古近系沙一段下部湖相碳酸盐岩储层特征及控制因素[J].新疆地质,2010,28(2):186-189.Zeng Deming,Zhao Min,Shi Xin,et al.Diagenesis of limestone rocks in the lower part of 1st Member of Eogene Shahejie Formation in Huanghua depression[J].Xinjiang Geology,2010,28(2):186-189.
    [3]梁宏斌,旷红伟,刘俊奇,等.冀中坳陷束鹿凹陷古近系沙河街组三段泥灰岩成因探讨[J].古地理学报,2007,9(2):168-173.Liang Hongbin,Kuang Hongwei,Liu Junqi,et al.Discussion on origin for marls of the Member 3 of Shahejie Formation of Paleogene in Shulu Sag of Central Hebei Depression[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2007,9(2):168-173.
    [4]郭洪金,李勇,钟建华,等.山东东辛油田古近系沙河街组一段碳酸盐岩储集特征[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2006,36(3):351-355.Guo Hongjin,Li Yong,Zhong Jianhua,et al.Carbonate reservoir properties in Member 1 of Shahejie Formation of Paleogene in the Dongxin Oilfield,Shandong Province[J].Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition,2006,36(3):351-355.
    [5]曾德铭,赵敏,石新,等.黄骅坳陷古近系沙一段下部碳酸盐岩成岩作用[J].中国地质,2010,37(1):110-115.Zeng Deming,Zhao Min,Shi Xin,et al.Diagenesis of carbonate rocks in the lower part of 1st Member of Eogene Shahejie Formation in Huanghua depression[J].Geology in China,2010,37(1):110-115.
    [6]倪军娥,孙立春,古莉,等.渤海海域石臼坨凸起Q油田沙二段储层沉积模式[J].石油与天然气地质,2013,34(4):491-498.Ni Jun'e,Sun Lichun,Gu Li,et al.Depositional patterns of the2nd member of the Shahejie Formation in Q oilfield of the Shijiutuo Uplift,Bohai Sea[J].Oil&Gas Geology,2013,34(4):491-498.
    [7]Balossino P,Pampuri F,Bruni C,et al.An integrated approach to obtain reliable permeability profiles from logs in a carbonate reservoir[J].SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering,2008,11(4):8-9.
    [8]Büyükutku A G.Reservoir properties of Karaisali formation in the Adana Basin,Southern Turkey[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2009,65(1/2):33-44.
    [9]廖光明.范庄油田阜宁组沉积体系及砂体建筑结构分析[J].西南石油学院学报,2006,28(2):4-7.Liao Guangming.Analysis on sedimentary system and reservoir architecture of delta-shallow lake facies of Fanzhuang in Jinhu depression[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University,2006,28(2):4-7.
    [10]张金亮,司学强,林辉.金湖凹陷阜三段沉积相分析[J].中国海洋大学学报,2006,36(4):535-539.Zhang Jinliang,Si Xueqiang,Lin Hui.Sedimentary facies analysis of the 3rdmember of the Funing Formation in the Jinhu depression[J].Periodical of Ocean University of China,2006,36(4):535-539.
    [11]张宏国,戴俊生,王霞田,等.苏北盆地金湖凹陷西斜坡构造特征及构造演化[J].地球科学与环境学报,2011,33(4):349-353.Zhang Hongguo,Dai Junsheng,Wang Xiatian,et al.Structural feature and tectonic evolution of western slope in Jinhu Sag,Subei Basin[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2011,33(4):349-353.
    [12]戴俊生,王霞田,季宗镇,等.高邮凹陷南断阶东部阜宁期构造应力场及其对断层的控制作用[J].中国石油大学学报:自然科学版,2011,35(2):1-5.Dai Junsheng,Wang Xiatian,Ji Zongzhen,et al.Structural stress field of Funing sedimentary period and its control on faults in the east of south fault terrace in Gaoyou sag[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum,2011,35(2):1-5.
    [13]宋书君.复杂断块群四维应力场模型及油藏预测[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2003:63-67.Song Shujun.Reservoir prediction and the four-dimensional model of stress field in complex fault group[M].Beijing:Petroleum Press,2003:63-67.
    [14]张琴,朱筱敏,董国栋,等.苏北盆地金湖凹陷戴南组成岩阶段划分及其油气地质意义[J].石油实验地质,2013,35(1):53-59.Zhang Qin,Zhu Xiaomin,Dong Guodong,et al.Diagenesis stage division and petroleum geologic significances of Dainan Formation in Jinhu Sag,Northern Jiangsu Basin[J].Petroleum Geology&Experiment,2013,35(1):53-59.
    [15]傅学斌.小型箕状断陷盆地构造—沉积模式与油气成藏:以苏北管镇次凹为例[J].地质科技情报,2009,28(2):77-80.Fu Xuebin.The structure-sedimentation model and reservoir forming of little half-graben basin:A case study of Guanzhen Subsag in northern Jiangsu Basin[J].Geological Science and Technology Information,2009,28(2):77-80.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心