川西大邑构造须家河组应力场数值模拟
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
根据野外调查、钻井岩心、测井和地震解释等资料,结合构造应力场数值模拟,对四川盆地大邑地区须家河组裂缝进行了综合预测及评价。结果表明,构造裂缝的发育程度是大邑地区天然气高产的重要控制因素。川西大邑构造是龙门山前一个重要的三级构造,其须二、须三段整体为一个被F1、F2断层所夹持的南西扬起、北东倾伏,北西翼陡、南东翼缓的大型不对称鼻状构造。构造形成于早白垩世晚期的燕山Ⅱ幕构造运动,经历了早喜山期构造运动的进一步加强和改造,于晚喜山期最终定型。须二段Ⅰ砂组及须三段Ⅰ砂组裂缝均发育于F1、F2断层所夹持的构造轴部及近轴部区域,主体上呈北东向条带状展布。靠近断层带、羽状断层与主干断层形成的断块以及褶皱倾伏端裂缝相对发育,构造鞍部、斜坡裂缝发育程度则较差。
According to field survey,drilling cores,logging data and seismic interpretation,combined with the tectonic stress field numerical simulation,this paper has carried on the comprehensive prediction and evaluation of fractures of the Xujiahe Formation in the Sichuan Basin.The results show that the degree of development of tectonic fractures Dayi area gas yield is an important controlling factor.Dayi structure in Sichuan is an important three class structure of Longmenshan piedmont,the second and third members of the Xujiahe Formation is sandwiched by F1,F2 faults which SW raised,overturning the NE,NW steep,south east wing slow large asymmetric nose structure.Structure was formed in the late Early Cretaceous Yanshan tectonic movement,through the Early and Late Himalayan tectonic movement further strengthening and trans formation.The crack in sand groupⅠ of the second and third members of the Xujiahe Formation were developed in the F1,F2 fracture structure sandwiched-shaft portion and the near-axis region,the subject was on the north-east banded cloth.Near the fault zone,feathery main fault rupture and block the formation of cracks and folds overturning end relatively developed,constructed saddle,slope fracture development is poor.
引文
[1]赵爽,高倩,谯述容.川西DY地区三叠系须家河组二段地震相分析与沉积相预测[J].石油地球物理勘探,2009,44(3):341-346.
    [2]胡明毅,李士祥,魏国齐,等.川西前陆盆地上三叠统须家河组沉积体系及演化特征[J].石油天然气学报:江汉石油学院学报,2008,30(5):5-10.
    [3]熊亮,康保平,魏力民,等.川西大邑构造须二、三段储层特征及控制因素[J].石油天然气学报:江汉石油学院学报,2010,32(6):366-369.
    [4]罗啸泉,李书兵,赵锡奎.川西龙门山构造特征与油气关系[J].石油实验地质,2011,33(4):384-387.
    [5]汤良杰,崔敏.中上扬子区关键构造变革期、构造变形样式与油气保存[J].石油实验地质,2011,33(1):12-16.
    [6]林良彪,陈洪德,姜平,等.川西前陆盆地须家河组沉积相及岩相古地理演化[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2006,33(4):376-383.
    [7]李虎,秦启荣,王志萍,等.大邑构造须二段储层裂缝预测[J].岩性油气藏,2010,22(2):107-110.
    [8]王志萍,秦启荣,王保全,等.四川盆地大邑地区须家河组裂缝成因探讨[J].岩性油气藏,2012,24(3):97-101.
    [9]李智武,刘树根,陈洪德,等.龙门山冲断带分段-分带性构造格局及其差异变形特征[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2008,35(4):440-453.
    [10]李嵘,张娣,朱丽霞.四川盆地川西坳陷须家河组砂岩致密化研究[J].石油实验地质,2011,33(3):274-281.
    [11]王二七,孟庆任.对龙门山中生代和新生代构造演化的讨论[J].中国科学:D辑,2008,38(10):1221-1233.
    [12]董绍鹏,韩竹军,尹金辉,等.龙门山山前大邑断裂活动时代与最新构造变形样式初步研究[J].地震地质,2008,30(4):996-1003.
    [13]刘峡.华北地区现今地壳运动及形变动力学数值模拟[D].合肥:中国科学技术大学,2007:97-150.
    [14]李志勇,曾佐勋,黄郑,等.基于MSC MARC的三维构造应力场数值模拟与裂缝预测:以宝浪油田宝北区块为例[J].地质力学学报,2007,13(3):232-238.
    [15]Memarian H,Fergusson C L.Multipe fracture sets in the southeastern Permian-Triassic Sydney Basin,New South Wales[J].Australian Journal of Earth Sciences,2003,50(1):49-61.
    [16]Eichhubl P,Aydin A.Ductile opening-mode fracture by pore growth and coalescence during combustion alteration of siliceous mudstone[J].Journal of Structural Geology,2003,25(1):121-134.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心