准噶尔盆地地层剥蚀厚度定量恢复方法研究与应用:以克拉玛依油田八区二叠系下乌尔禾组为例
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
准噶尔盆地克拉玛依油田八区二叠系下乌尔禾组逐层超覆,后期受强烈冲断作用而抬升,并遭受强烈剥蚀。恢复其地层古厚度不仅能够重建该区埋藏演化史,也是油气资源定量评价的重要基础。然而,研究区勘探程度低,传统剥蚀厚度计算方法受限。针对实际地质条件与现有资料,文中利用地震地层趋势法和沉积层序分析法,在准确圈定剥蚀边界的基础上,根据邻层厚度比值法和参考层厚度变化率法,计算出下乌尔禾组三段剥蚀厚度。在此基础上,通过分析下乌尔禾组三段关键时期的沉积演化特征,建立了研究区扇三角洲沉积模式,确定了扇三角洲前缘储集相带展布范围,为今后的油气勘探提供了可靠的地质依据。
The Permian Lower Urho Formation overlapped layer by layer in the Block 8 of Karamay Oilfield,Junggar Basin. It suffered from intense denudation because of the late strong thrusting and uplifting. Therefore,resuming stratum palaeothickness not only can rebuild the burial and evolution history of the study area,but also is an important base of quantitative estimation of petroleum resources. However,traditional calculation method of denudation thickness is constrained by low degree of exploration. According to actual data and geological conditions of the study area,a suite of quantitative calculation method is probed out. Based on a new way of seismic trend thickness integrated with sedimentary sequences analysis,denudation boundary of the Permian Lower Urho Formation has been outlined. A composite method of the thickness ratio of nearby layers and the change ratio of reference layer thickness have been applied in calculating true denudation thickness of the Member 3 of Lower Urho Formation. By analyzing evolution characteristics of the Member 3 of Lower Urho Formation in the key sedimentary periods,a sedimentary model of fan delta has been established in the study area. The distribution range of delta front subfacies is also depicted at the same time,which can provide reliable geological evidence for the future petroleum exploration.
引文
曹强,叶加仁,王巍.2007.沉积盆地地层剥蚀厚度恢复方法及进展[J].中国石油勘探,(6):41-46.
    陈书平,况军,刘继山,等.2008.准噶尔盆地西北缘克—百地区不整合面及其动力学条件[J].高校地质学报,14(2):199-205.
    郝石生,贺志勇,高耀斌,等.1988.恢复地层剥蚀厚度的最优化方法[J].沉积学报,6(4):93-99.
    何登发,陈新发,张义杰,等.2004a.准噶尔盆地油气富集规律[J]石油学报,25(3):1-10.
    何登发,尹成,杜社宽,等.2004b.前陆冲断带构造分段特征:以准噶尔盆地西北缘断裂构造带为例[J].地学前缘,11(4):91-101.
    何将启,王宜芳.2002.计算剥蚀厚度的优化孔隙度法:程序及应用[J].高校地质学报,8(2):207-214.
    况军,齐雪峰.2006.准噶尔前陆盆地构造特征与油气勘探方向[J].新疆石油地质,27(1):5-9.
    李明诚,李伟.1996.利用平衡浓度研究天然气的扩散:扩散量模拟的一种新方法[J].天然气工业,16(1):1-5.
    李儒峰,杨永强,张刚雄,等.2012.松辽北部徐家围子白垩系不整合剥蚀量系统恢复[J].地球科学,37(2):47-54.
    李泰明.1989.石油地质过程定量研究概论[M].山东东营:石油大学出版社.
    李伟.1996.恢复地层剥蚀厚度方法综述[J].中国海上油气(地质),10(3):167-171.
    梁全胜,刘震,何小胡,等.2009.根据地震资料恢复勘探新区地层剥蚀量[J].新疆石油地质,30(1):103-105.
    刘翠敏,向宝力,孟皓锦,等.2008.准噶尔盆地中拐凸起侏罗系油藏油气成因分析[J].天然气勘探与开发,31(2):26.
    刘光炎,蒋录全.1995.平衡剖面技术与地震资料解释[J].石油地球物理勘探,30(6):833-844.
    刘国臣,金之钧,李京昌.1995.沉积盆地沉积—剥蚀过程定量研究的一种新方法:盆地波动分析应用之一[J].沉积学报,13(3)23-31.
    牟中海,陈志勇,陆廷清,等.2000.柴达木盆地北缘中生界剥蚀厚度恢复[J].石油勘探与开发,27(1):35-37.
    牟中海,唐勇,崔炳富,等.2002.塔西南地区地层剥蚀厚度恢复研究[J].石油学报,23(1):40-44.
    石昕,张立平,何登发,等.2005.准噶尔盆地西北缘油气成藏模式分析[J].天然气地球科学,14(4):460-463.
    史基安,何周,丁超,等.2010.准噶尔盆地西北缘克百地区二叠系沉积特征及沉积模式[J].沉积学报,28(5):962-967.
    宋鸿林.1985.平衡剖面及其地质意义[J].地质科技情报,4(1)18-28.
    王毅,金之钧.1999.沉积盆地中恢复地层剥蚀量的新方法[J].地球科学进展,14(5):482-486.
    吴涛,赵长永,吴采西,等.2013.准噶尔盆地湖底扇沉积特征及地球物理响应[J].石油与天然气地质,34(1):85-94.
    鄢继华,崔永北,陈世悦,等.2009.准噶尔盆地乌夏地区二叠系沉积特征及有利储集层[J].新疆石油地质,30(3):304-306.
    阎世信,刘怀山,姚雪根.2000.山地地球物理勘探技术[M].北京:石油工业出版社,158.
    尹天放.1992.多种信息综合计算剥蚀厚度方法[J].石油勘探与开发,19(5):42-47.
    袁玉松,郑和荣,涂伟.2008.沉积盆地剥蚀量恢复方法[J].石油实验地质,30(6):636-642.
    张国俊,杨文孝.1983.克拉玛依大断裂带构造特征及找油领域[J].新疆石油地质,4(1):1-5.
    周路,郑金云,雷德文,等.2007.准噶尔盆地车莫古隆起侏罗系剥蚀厚度恢复[J].古地理学报,9(3):243-252.
    周瑶琪,陆永潮,李思田,等.1997.间断面缺失时间的计算问题[J].地质学报,71(1):7-17.
    Dow W G.1977.Kerogen studies and geological interpretation[J].Journal of Geochemical Exploration,2:79-99.
    Guidish T M.1985.Basin evaluation using burial history caleu1ations:An overview[J].AAPG Bulletin,(1):92-104.
    Lastett G M,Green P F,Duddy I R,et al.1987.Thermal annealing ofission tracks in apatite:A quantitative analysis[J].Chemical Geology,73:25-38.
    Magara.1976.Thickness of removed sedimentary rocks,paleoporepressure and paleotemperature,southwestern part of Western Canada basin[J].AAPG Bulletin,60:554-566.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心