基于芦山余震强震动记录的场地特征分析
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
2013年4月20日Ms7.0芦山地震之后,我国数字强震动台网又捕获了千余组余震记录。本文采用强震动记录的水平向与垂直向的谱比法对触发的41个固定台站进行了场地特征分析,利用谱型特征和卓越周期对场地进行了初步的类别划分。通过对3个典型台站场地的钻孔资料对比讨论,表明强震动记录谱比曲线的谱型、卓越周期较好体现了台站的场地特征。与目前我国抗震规范中场地分类方法相比,本文采用的谱比法分类突出了场地的地震反应特征,与等效剪切波速等指标一样可作为描述场地特征的依据,这为进一步完善我国强震台站的场地特征提供方法。
The National Strong Motion Observation Network System of China has captured more than a thousand of aftershock records after the Ms7. 0 Lushan main shock on April 20,2013. This paper estimates the site effect of 41 fixed stations using the horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio method,and gives the preliminary sites classification based on the shape of spectral ratio and natural period of the sites. The results show that the mean H / V amplification curve and the natural period can properly reflect the characteristic of site corresponding to the borehole profile of three different typical strong-motion stations. Compared with the site classification in Chinese seismic code,the spectral ratio method focuses on the seismic response,which is a valuable supplement to the traditional site parameters,such as equivalent shear wave velocity. The method could be referred to study the site characteristic of Chinese strong-motion stations.
引文
[1]Nakamura Y.A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface[R].Quarterly Report of the Railways Technology Research Institute,1989,30:25-30.
    [2]Yamazaki F,Ansary M A.Horizontal-to-vertical spectrum ratio of earthquake ground motion for site characterization[J].Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamics,1997,26(7):671-689.
    [3]Zhao J X,Irikura K,Zhang J,et al.An empirical site-classification method for strong-motion stations in Japan using H/V response ratio[J].Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,2006,96(3):914-925.
    [4]Zare M,Bard P Y,Ghafory-Ashtiany M.Site characterizations for the Iranian strong motion network[J].Soil Dynamic and Earthquake Engineering,1999,18(2):101-123.
    [5]Lee C T,Cheng C H,Liao C W,et al.Site classification of Taiwan free-field strong-motion stations[J].Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,2001,91(5):1283-1297.
    [6]Wen RZ,Ren Y F,Shi D C.Improved HVSR site classification method for free-field strong motion stations validated with Wenchuan aftershock recordings[J].Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration,2011,10(3):325-337.
    [7]高光伊,于海英,李山有.中国大陆强震动观测[J].世界地震工程,2001,17(4):13-18.GAO Guangyi,YU Haiying,LI Shanyou.Strong ground motion observation for China mainland[J].World Earthquake Engineering,2001,17(4):13-18.(in Chinese)
    [8]温瑞智,周正华,任叶飞,等.汶川强余震流动观测与典型余震记录分析[J].地震工程与工程振动,2009,29(5):15-21.WEN Ruizhi,ZHOU Zhenghua,REN Yefei,et al,The mobile strong-motion observation and preliminary analysis of typical records for Wenchuan aftershocks[J].Journal of Earthquake and Engineering Vibration,2009,29(5):15-21.(in Chinese)
    [9]任叶飞,温瑞智,周宝峰.强震动记录编目——以汶川余震流动观测记录为例[J].震灾防御技术,2011,6(4):406-415.REN Yeifei,WEN Ruizhi,ZHOU Baofeng.Cataloging strong-motion recordings——an example of wenchuan mobile strong-motion observation[J].Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention,2011,6(4):406-415.(in Chinese)
    [10]Ren Y F,Wen R Z,Yamanaka H,et al.Site effects by generalized inversion technique using strong motion recordings of the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake[J].Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration,2013,12(2):165-184.
    [11]温瑞智,任叶飞,黄旭涛,等.芦山7.0级地震强震动记录及其震害相关性[J].地震工程与工程振动,2013,33(4):1-14.WEN Ruizhi,REN Yefei,HUANG Xutao,et al.Strong motion records and their engineering damage implications for Lushan Earthquake on April20,2013[J].Journal of Earthquake and Engineering Vibration,2013,33(4):1-14.(in Chinese)
    [12]Boore D M.Effect of baseline corrections on displacements and response spectra for several recordings of the 1999 Chi-Chi,Taiwan[J].Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,2001,91(5):1199-1211.
    [13]Wen K L,Chang T M,Lin C M,et al.Identification of nonlinear site response using the H/V spectral ratio method[J].Terrestrial,Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences,2006,17(3):533-546.
    [14]Japan Road Association.Specifications for Highway Bridges Part V Seismic Design[S].Maruzen Co.,LTD,1990.
    [15]Ghasemi H,Zare M,Fukushima Y,et al.Applying empirical methods in site classification,using response spectral ratio(H/V):A case study on Iranian strong motion network(ISMN)[J].Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,2009,29(1):121-132.
    [16]Alessandro C D,Bonilla F L,Boore D M,et al.Predominant-period site classification for response spectra Prediction equations in Italy[J].Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,2012,102(2):680-695.
    [17]Building Seismic Safety Council.The 2003 NEHRP Recommended Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures:Part I(Provisions)and Part II(Commentary)[S].FEMA 368/369,Federal Emergency Management Agency,Washington,D.C.,2003.
    [18]Kendall M G.Rank correlation methods[M].1970.
    [19]GB50011-2010建筑抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版,2010.GB50011-2010 Code for Seismic Design of Buildings[S].Beijing:Building Industry Press of China,2010.(in Chinese)

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心