利用接收函数方法研究四川地区地壳结构
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
采用接收函数反演和共转换点(CCP)偏移叠加成像方法,利用四川数字地震台网宽频带的52个区域固定地震台站和布设的两条52个宽频带流动地震观测台站的远震地震波形数据资料,对四川地区地壳结构进行研究。结果表明,四川地区的Moho面深度在青藏高原和四川盆地差异明显,在川西高原地区地壳厚度为52~68km,在川滇地块地壳厚度为50~60km,在中地壳内存在不连续的低速层分布;而在四川盆地地壳厚度为38~45km,地壳内没有低速层存在。Moho面深度从川西高原的60多公里至四川盆地的约40km,在二者的交界处龙门山断裂带下面,存在厚度约30km左右宽的下降过渡带,说明其下的Moho面可能受断层影响,结构比较复杂;在高原地区的上地壳界面和下地壳上界面比四川盆地的相应界面深;高原地区在中地壳的上部有不连续的低速层分布,在松潘—甘孜地块的上地壳下部存在向南东运动的脆性推覆体,在羌塘—理塘地块的上地壳下部存在向南东和南运动的脆性物质流动。
Using digital waveform data of 52 regional fixed broad band stations in the Sichuan Digital Seismic Network and two profiles of 52 temporary broad band seismic stations,we applied the receiver function inversion and the common conversion point(CCP)stacking method to study crustal structure in Sichuan area.The result shows that there is obvious difference in the depth of Moho between Tibetan Plateau in west Sichuan and the Sichuan basin,the crust in the western plateau of Sichuan is about 52~68km thick,and the crust in Sichuan—Yunnan block is about 50~60km thick,the discontinuous low velocity layer is found at the middle crust.The crust thickness of the Sichuan basin is about38~45km,and there is no low velocity layer in the crust.The Moho depth is from more60 km in the west Sichuan to about 40 km in the Sichuan basin.In the boundary zone located in the Longmenshan fault,there is a decline belt of the depth about 30 km,which shows that the Moho discontinuity is complex due to be affected by the Longmenshan fault,and the interface of the upper crust in the plateau is deeper than that in the basin.The upper middle crust has a discontinuous low-velocity layer in the plateau.There is a brittle nappe moving south east in the bottom of Songpan—Ganzi upper crust,and brittle materials flow to the south and south east in the bottom of Qiangtang—Litang upper crust.
引文
[1]张培震.青藏高原东缘川西地区的现今改造变形、应力分配与深部动力过程[J].中国科学D辑:地球科学,2008,38(9):1 041-1 056.
    [2]马杏垣.中国岩石圈动力学图集[M].北京:中国地图出版社,1989,1-68.
    [3]Huang Z W,Su Y,Peng Y,et al.Rayleigh wave tomography of China and adjacent regions[J].J Geophys Res,2003,108(B2):2 073,doi:10.1029/2001JB001696.
    [4]Vinnik L P.Detection of waves converted from P to SV in the mantle[J].Phys Earth Planet Int,1977,15:39-45.
    [5]Langston C A.The effect of planar dipping structure on source and receiver responses for constant ray parameter[J].Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,1977,67(4):1 029-1 050.
    [6]Owans T J,Zandt G,Taylor S R.Seismic evidence for ancient rift beneath the Cumberland plateau,Tennessee:A detailed analysis of broadband teleseismic P waveforms[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,1984,89(B9):7 783-7 795.
    [7]刘启元,Rainer Kind,李顺成.接收函数复谱比的最大或然性估计及非线性反演[J].地球物理学报,1996,39(4):502-511.
    [8]徐强,赵俊猛.接收函数方法的研究综述[J].地球物理学进展,2008,23(6):1 709-1 716.
    [9]朱介寿.汶川地震的岩石圈深部结构与动力学背景[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2008,35(4):348-356.
    [10]崔作舟,卢德源,陈纪平,等.花石峡—邵阳深部地壳结构和构造[M].北京:地质出版社,1996,49-168.
    [11]王椿镛,吴建平,楼海,等.川西藏东地区的地壳P波速度结构[J].中国科学D辑:地球科学,2003,33(增刊):181-189.
    [12]Zhu L P.Crustal structure across the San Andreas Fault,southern California from teleseismic converted waves[J].Earth and Planetary Science Letters,2000,179(1):183-190.
    [13]武岩,丁志峰,朱露培.利用共转换点叠加方法研究华北地区地壳结构[J].地球物理学报,2011,54(10):2 528-2 537.
    [14]Zhu L P.Lateral variation of the Tibetan lithospheric structure inferred from teleseismic waveforms.In:Chen Y T,et al.eds.Advancements in Seismology and Physics of the Earth Interior in China.Beijing:Seismological Press,2004,295-310.
    [15]刘启元,李昱,陈九辉,等.汶川MS8.0地震:地壳上地幔S波速度结构的初步研究[J].地球物理学报,2009,52(2):309-319.
    [16]李永华,吴庆举,田小波,等.青藏高原拉萨及羌塘块体的地壳结构研究[J].地震学报2006,28(6):586-595.
    [17]李海鸥,姜枚,王有学,等.青藏高原地壳的低速层与部分熔融[J].物探与化探,2004,28(4):290-293.
    [18]Tapponnier P,Pehzer G,Le Dain A Y,et al.Propagating extrusion tectonics in Asia:New insights from simple experiments with plasticize[J].Geology,1982,10(12):611-616.
    [19]Zhang Peizhen,Shen Zhengkang,Wang Min,et al.Continuous deformation of the Tibetan Plateau from Global Positioning System data[J].Geology,2004,32(9):809-812.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心