基于谱比法的我国强震台站场地分类
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
目前我国强震台网的部分台站场地资料尚不完整,很大程度限制了我国强震数据的广泛应用。为改变这一现状,利用日本KiK-net台站的场地钻孔资料和强震记录,按照规范对其中279个台站进行场地分类,利用谱比法统计我国Ⅰ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ三类场地的标准谱比曲线,并通过分析谱比曲线卓越周期、谱比峰值和谱形差异,提出适合我国抗震规范场地类别划分的经验方法。利用四川地区的强震台站钻孔资料进行方法验证,说明地域性差异对本场地分类方法准确率的影响不大。最后,处理了中国大陆2007~2011年的强震记录,按照该方法对113个强震台站进行场地分类。
Site conditions of some strong earthquake stations in China are still unknown,which greatly restrict the effective application of strong earthquake records. A site classification scheme was proposed based on the strong earthquake data from Japanese KiK-net stations according to standard,and the mean site classification curves in China were calculated using the spectral ratio method from 279 stations of KiK-net. Then an empirical method for the site classification in China was proposed based on the range of predominant period,the peak value of spectral ratio and the spectral shape. Compared with the borehole information of stations in Sichuan province,China,the classified result shows that this method is independent of differences of regions. Finally, 113 strong earthquake stations of China were classified using the records during 2007 to 2011.
引文
[1]中华人民共和国国家标准编写组.GB50011—2010建筑抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.(The National Standards Compilation Group of People's Republic of China.GB50011—2010Code for seismic design of buildings[S].Beijing:China Building Industry Press,2010.(in Chinese))
    [2]中华人民共和国国家标准编写组.GB17741—2005工程场地地震安全性评价[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2005.(The National Standards Compilation Group of People's Republic of China.GB17741—2005 Evaluation of seismic safety for engineering sites[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China,2005.(in Chinese))
    [3]NAKAMURA Y.A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface[J].Railway Technical Research Institute,1989,30(1):25–33.
    [4]YAMAZAKI F,ANSARY M A.Horizontal-to-vertical spectrum ratio of earthquake ground motion for site characterization[J].Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,1997,26(7):671–689.
    [5]ZHAO J X,IRIKURA K,ZHANG J.An empirical site-classification method for strong-motion stations in Japan using H/V response ratio[J].Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,2006,96(3):914–925.
    [6]ALESSANDRO C D,BONILLA L F,BOORE D M,et al.Predominant-period site classification for response spectra prediction equations in Italy[J].Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,2012,102(2):680–695.
    [7]GHASEMI H,ZARE M,FUKUSHIMA Y,et al.Applying empirical methods in site classification,using response spectral ratio(H/V):A case study on Iranian strong motion network(ISMN)[J].Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,2009,29(1):121–132.
    [8]WEN R Z,REN Y F,ZHOU Z H,et al.Preliminary site classification of free-field strong motion stations based on Wenchuan earthquake records[J].Earthquake Science,2010,23(1):101–110.
    [9]WEN R Z,REN Y F,SHI D C.Improved HVSR site classification method for free-field strong motion stations validated with Wenchuan aftershock recordings[J].Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration,2011,10(3):325–337.
    [10]郭锋.抗震设计中有关场地的若干问题研究[硕士学位论文][D].武汉:华中科技大学,2010.(GUO Feng.Research on some issues of site for seismic design[M.S.Thesis][D].Wuhan:Huazhong University of Science and Technology,2010.(in Chinese))
    [11]BOORE D M.Effect of baseline corrections on displacements and response spectra for several recordings of the 1999 Chi-Chi,Taiwan[J].Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,2001,91(5):1 199–1 211.
    [12]BERESNEV I A,WEN K L.Nonlinear soil response-a reality?[J].Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,1996,86(6):1 964–1 978.
    [13]FUKUSHIMA Y,BONILLA L F,SCOTTI O,et al.Site classification using horizontal-to-vertical response spectral ratios and its impact when deriving empirical ground-motion prediction equations[J].Journal of Earthquake Engineering,2007,11(5):712–724.
    [14]SPEARMAN C.The proof and measurement of association between two things[J].The American Journal of Psychology,1904,15(1):72–101.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心