非稳态地震稀疏约束反褶积研究(英文)
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
传统Robinson褶积模型主要受缚于三种不合理的假设,即白噪反射系数、最小相位地震子波与稳态假设,而现代反射系数反演方法(如稀疏约束反褶积等)均在前两个假设上寻求突破的同时却忽视了一个重要事实:实际地震信号具有典型的非稳态特征,这直接冲击着反射系数反演中地震子波不随时间变化的这一基础性假设。本文首先通过实际反射系数测试证实,非稳态效应造成重要信息无法得到有效展现,且对深层影响尤为严重。为校正非稳态影响,本文从描述非稳态方面具有普适性的非稳态褶积模型出发,借助对数域的衰减曲线指导检测非稳态影响并以此实现对非稳态均衡与校正。与常规不同,本文利用对数域Gabor反褶积仅移除非稳态影响,而将分离震源子波和反射系数的任务交给具有更符合实际条件的稀疏约束反褶积处理,因此结合两种反褶积技术即可有效解决非稳态特征影响,又能避免反射系数和地震子波理想化假设的不利影响。海上地震资料的应用实际表明,校正非稳态影响有助于恢复更丰富的反射系数信息,使得与地质沉积和构造相关的细节特征得到更加清晰的展现。
The Robinson convolution model is mainly restricted by three inappropriate assumptions, i.e., statistically white reflectivity, minimum-phase wavelet, and stationarity. Modern reflectivity inversion methods(e.g., sparsity-constrained deconvolution) generally attempt to suppress the problems associated with the first two assumptions but often ignore that seismic traces are nonstationary signals, which undermines the basic assumption of unchanging wavelet in reflectivity inversion. Through tests on reflectivity series, we confirm the effects of nonstationarity on reflectivity estimation and the loss of significant information, especially in deep layers. To overcome the problems caused by nonstationarity, we propose a nonstationary convolutional model, and then use the attenuation curve in log spectra to detect and correct the influences of nonstationarity. We use Gabor deconvolution to handle nonstationarity and sparsity-constrained deconvolution to separating reflectivity and wavelet. The combination of the two deconvolution methods effectively handles nonstationarity and greatly reduces the problems associated with the unreasonable assumptions regarding reflectivity and wavelet. Using marine seismic data, we show that correcting nonstationarity helps recover subtle reflectivity information and enhances the characterization of details with respect to the geological record.
引文
Bickel,S.H.,and Natarajan,R.R.,1985,Plane-wave Q deconvolution:Geophysics,50,1426–1439.
    Canadas,G.,2002,A mathematical framework for blindde convolution inversion problems:72nd Ann.Soc.Expl.Geophys.Mtg.,Expanded Abstract.
    Curry,W.,2003,Interpolation of irregularly-sampleddata with non-stationary,multi-scale prediction-error filters:73rd Ann.Soc.Expl.Geophys.Mtg.,Expanded Abstracts,1913–1916.
    Dondurur,D.,2010,An approximation to sparse-spikereflectivity using the gold econvolution method:Pure and Applied Geophysics,167,1233–1245.
    Griffiths,L.J.,Smolka,F.R.,and Trembly,L.D.,1977,Adaptive deconvolution:A new technique for processing time-varying seismic data:Geophysics,42,742–759.
    Guitton,A.,2004,Amplitude and kinematic corrections of migrated images for nonunitary imaging operators:Geophysics,69(4),1017–1024.
    Hargreaves,N.D.,and Calvert A.J.,1991,Inverse Qfiltering by Fourier transform:Geophysics,56,519–527.
    Ismail,S.,2008,Nonstationary filters:Ph D.Thesis,University of Calgary,2008.
    Kjartansson,E.,1979,Constant Q-wave propagation and attenuation:Journal of Geophysical Research,84,B9,4737–4748.
    Koehler,F.,and Taner,M.T.,1985,The use of the conjugate-gradient algorithm in the computation of predictive deconvolution operators:Geophysics,50,2752–2758.
    Lazear,G.D.,1993,Mixed phase wavelet estimation using fourth order cumulants:Geophysics,58,1042–1051.
    Levy,S.,and Oldenburg,D.W.,1987,Automaticphase correction of common-midpoint stacked data:Geophysics,52,51–59.
    Longbottom,J.,Walden,A.T.,and White,R.E.,1988,Principles and application of maximum kurtosis phase estimation:Geophysical Prospecting,36,115–138.
    Ma,Y.,and Margrave,G.F.,2008,Seismic depth imaging with the Gabor transform:Geophysics,73(3),S91–S97.
    Margrave,G.F.,1998,Theory of nonstationary linear filtering in Fourier domain with application to time variant filtering:Geophysics,63,244–259.
    Margrave,G.F.,Henley,D.C.,and Lamoureux,M.P.,etal.,2003,Gabor deconvolution revisited:73th Ann.Soc.Expl.Geophys.Mtg.,Expanded Abstract,714–717.
    Margrave,G.F.,Lamoureux,M.P.,and D.C.Henley,2011,Gabor deconvolution:Estimating reflectivity by nonstationary deconvolution of seismic data:Geophysics,76,W15–W30.
    Margrave,G.F.,Lamoureux,M.P.,Grossman,J.P.,andIliescu,V.,2002,Gabor deconvolution of seismic datafor source waveform and Q correction:72nd Ann.Soc.Expl.Geophys.Mtg.,Expanded Abstracts,2190–2193.
    Montana,C.A.,and Margrave,G.F.,2005,Phase correction in Gabor deconvolution:75th Annual International Meeting,Expanded Abstracts,2173–2176.
    O’Doherty,R.F.,and Anstey,N.A.,1971,Reflections on amplitudes:Geophysical Prospecting,19,no.3,430–458.
    Rosa,A.L.R.,and Ulrych,T.J.,1991,Processing viaspectral modeling:Geophysics,56,1244–1251.
    Sacchi,M.D.,1997,Reweighting strategies in seismic deconvolution:Geophys.J.Int.,129,651–656.
    Sun,X.K.,Sun,Z.D.,and Peng,T.et al.,2012,Gabor Deconvolution:Hyperbolic Smoothing in Logarithmic Magnitude Spectrum:82nd Ann.Soc.Expl.Geophys.Mtg.,Expanded Abstract,2012.
    Sun,X.K.,Sun,Z.D.,and Zhou,X.Y.,et al.,2013,Gabor deconvolution based on hyperbolic smoothing in logspectra:75th EAGE Conference &Exhibition,ExtendedAbstract.
    Sun,Z.D.,Yang,H.,and Zhang,Y.et al.,2011,The application of amplitude-preserved processing and migration for carbonate reservoir prediction in the Tarim Basin,China:Petroleum Science,8,406–413.
    Van der Baan,M.,and Pham,D.T.,2008,Robust waveletestimation and blind deconvolution of noisy surface seismic:Geophysics,73,V37–V46.
    Velis,D.R.,2008,Stochastic sparse-spike deconvolution:Geophysics,73(1),R1–R9.
    Walden,A.T.,and Hosken,J.W.J.,1986,The nature of thenon-Gaussianity of primary reflection coefficients and itssignificance for deconvolution:Geophysical Prospecting,34,1038–1066.
    Wang,Y.,2006,Inverse Q-filter for seismic resolution enhancement:Geophysics,71,V51–V60.
    Wiggins,R.,1978,Minimum entropy deconvolution:Geoexploration,16,21–35.
    Liu,G.C.,2012,Theory and Application of NonstationaryFiltering in Seismic Data Analysis:Doctor Thesis,China University of Petroleum(Beijing).
    Liu,X.W.,Ning,J.C.,and Zhang,G.L.,2009,Cauchy sparse constrained Bayesian estimation based seismic blind deconvolution frame and algorithm:GeophysicalProspecting for Petroleum,48(5),459–464.
    Zhang,F.C.,Liu,J.,Ying,X.Y.,and Yang,P.J.,2008,Modified Cauchy-constrained seismic blind deconvolution:Oil Geophysical Prospecting,43(4),391–396.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心