黄河黑山峡大柳树坝址区最大潜在地震变形及地震应力模拟预测
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
在分析黄河黑山峡大柳树坝址处的中卫活动断裂带潜在地震危险性及地质、地球物理条件基础上,采用三维有限元方法模拟计算了该断裂带内F201断层发生6.5级、7.0级和7.5级地震时大柳树坝址区的潜在地震变形及地震应力。结果表明,F201断层发生中强以上地震(MS≥6.5)时,其南侧至少3 km范围内的地震变形及地震应力将超出地壳岩石的破裂变形极限,大柳树坝址的地震应变量值更是大于10-4,地震应力也将达到几兆帕,存在工程上尚难以处理的地震抗断问题。
On the base of analysing earthquake risk,geological and geophysical conditions for Zhongwei active fault zone where Daliusu dam-site located,the potential earthquake deformation and stress near the dam in the condition of earthquake with MS6.5,MS7.0 and MS7.5 on the fault F201 in the fault zone are simulated using 3D finite element method.The calculation results shows that if an earthquake of MS≥6.5 occurres on the fault F201,the ground earthquake deformation and stress would exceed the cracking limit of crust rock at least in the range of 3 km at south of the fault,the earthquake strain of Daliushu dam-site would be over 10-4 and the stress would be several megapascal(MPa),which will lead to the anti-rupture problem hard to solve in engineering project yet.
引文
[1]王爱国,石玉成,马巍.地震地表变形三维有限元数值分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(24):4124-4130.
    [2]闵伟,张培震,邓起东.中卫-同心断裂带全新世古地震研究[J].地震地质,2001,23(3):82-85.
    [3]梁收运,韩文峰,谌文武,等.大柳树坝址区断层测年研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2003,22(增2):2559-2663.
    [4]李雪峰,韩文峰,谌文武,等.黄河黑山峡大柳树坝址与小观音坝址岩体质量差异的原因探讨[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2003,22(增2):2551-2554.
    [5]马润勇,彭建兵,门玉明,等.黑山峡大柳树坝址区断裂构造格局与工程抗断问题研究[J].地质灾害与环境保护,2002,13(4):46-50.
    [6]柴寿喜,王银梅,王君国.大柳树坝址灌浆试验与岩体质量[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2003,22(增2):2555-2558.
    [7]谌文武,孙冠平,宋畅,等.大柳树堤址松动岩体的渗透特性[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2003,22(增2):2564-2567.
    [8]郭增建,秦保燕.震源物理[M].北京:地震出版社,1979.
    [9]陈运泰,林邦慧,林中洋,等.根据地面形变的观测研究1966年邢台地震的震源过程[J].地球物理学报,1975,18(3):164-182.
    [10]李天斌,孟方,王美芳,等.宁夏中西部香山-天景山地区逆冲推覆构造的特征及演化[J].地质通报,2005,24(4):309-315.
    [11]郭进京,杜东菊,韩文峰,等.黄河黑山峡大柳树坝址区F201和F7(8)断层的活动性[J].地质通报,2005,23(12):1259-1264.
    [12]张维岐,焦德成,柴枳章.宁夏香山-天景山弧形断裂带新活动特征及1709年中卫南7.5级地震形变带[J].地震地质,1988,10(3):12-20.
    [13]陈颢.地壳岩石的力学性能.北京:地震出版社,1988.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心