格尔木井模拟水氡与数字化气氡观测资料的对比分析
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
通过对格尔木井模拟水氡和数字化气氡年动态和月动态曲线的对比,结果表明,二者的变化趋势及均值变化有一定的相似性和差异性,数字化气氡观测受气温、气压等自然因素影响较多,而模拟水氡观测精度较低,受人为影响因素较多。
The yearly and monthly radon data recorded by analogous and digital seismographs in Golmud seismic station are analyzed,and the results show that their variation and mean values appeared certain similarity and differences.The digital data of radon in gas are influenced by natural factors,such as air temperature and air pressure,but the analogous data of radon in water are influenced by personal factors,and its precision is lower.
引文
[1]中国地震局.地震地下流体理论基础与观测技术(试用本)[M].北京:地震出版社,2007:131.
    [2]邱鹏成,赵昌军.格尔木地下流体项目概况及各测项数据可靠性分析[J].防灾技术高等专科学校学报,2005,7(3):43-47.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心