承压介质电阻率变化的方向性与主应力的关系
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
介质电阻率变化的方向性与主应力方向的关系研究一直受到岩石电阻率实验和地震学等学科的关注.本文在电极面4cm×8cm,6cm×12cm,8cm×16cm和4.6cm×10cm的10块分别为花岗岩、凝灰质粗砂岩(夹砾石)和细晶花岗岩标本上及100cm×100cm的1块人工合成模型上,采用对称四极法布设多位置、多极距、多方位电阻率测线,用单轴压缩、二维约束差应力压缩、低围压三轴差应力压缩和真三轴差应力压缩方式加载.其中在单轴压缩和低围压三轴压缩加载方式下,7块岩石标本中的4块被压破,3块没有被压破,只压到电阻率出现明显的下降异常时卸压.另在上述10块岩石标本中,还有3块是电阻率原始各向异性标本.将这样11块标本所获得的多位置、多极距、多方位测线电阻率资料,按从开始加载到破裂的过程,分成30%附近破裂应力段、50%附近破裂应力段、80%附近破裂应力段和100%破裂应力段,研究同一测点多方位测道中该4个破裂应力段视电阻率变化最大(最小)幅度测线方位与力源最大主压应力方位的关系,结果未发现二者之间有确定的关系.
Study on the relation between directional characteristics of resistivity changes and principal stress plays an important role in rock resistivity experiments and seismology. Using symmetrical four-electrode method, multi-position, multi-space and multi-direction resistivity arrays were arranged on 10 samples of granite, tuffaceous gritrock (with inclusion of gravel) and aplite granite, which have surface sizes of 4 cm×8 cm, 6 cm×12 cm, 8 cm×16 cm, 4.6 cm×10 cm, respectively, and 1 synthetic model of 100 cm×100 cm. The experiments were carried out with uniaxial, planar elastic constraint, low confining pressure and true triaxial compressions. In the uniaxial and low confining pressure tests, 4 of the 7 rock samples were loaded to rupture with macro-fractures, the other 3 were only loaded to the abnormal stage when resistivity began to decrease obviously. 3 of the 10 rock samples are samples of original resistivity anisotropy. According to the loading process from beginning to end, the resistivity data obtained from all of the 11 samples in the multi-position, multi-space and multi-direction resistivity arrays were divided into 4 rupture stress sections, namely, about 30%, about 50% and about 80% rupture stress sections and 100% rupture stress section. Thereby, the relation between directional characteristics of resistivity changes and principal stress corresponding to the 4 rupture stress sections is studied. However, the results show no confirmative relation between the two.
引文
安金珍,修济刚,陈峰,陈大元.1996.单轴压力下有补给水岩石电阻率变化各向异性研究[J].中国地震,12(3):300--306.
    陈大元,陈峰,王丽华.1983.单轴压力下岩石电阻率的研究:电阻率的各向异性[J].地球物理学报,26(增刊):784--792.
    陈大元,陈峰,贺国玉.1987.岩石受压过程中“应力反复”对电阻率的影响[J].地震学报,9(3):303--311.
    陈峰,陈大元,曹其平,于淑筠,许东俊,陈从新,余毓良,盛建豪.1993.原位岩体在剪切和摩擦滑动试验中的视电阻率变化特征研究[J].地震学报,15(2):217--223.
    陈峰,修济刚,安金珍,廖椿庭,陈大元.2000.岩石电阻率变化各向异性与微裂隙扩展方位实验研究[J].地震学报,22(3):310--318.
    陈峰,廖椿庭,安金珍.2002.弹性约束承载岩石电阻率变化形态研究[J].北京大学学报自然科学版,38(3):427--430.
    陈峰,安金珍,廖椿庭.2003a.原始电阻率各向异性岩石的电阻率变化各向异性[J].地球物理学报,46(2):271--280.
    陈峰,廖椿庭,安金珍.2003b.剪切和摩擦滑动大模型的视电阻率变化幅度和各向异性[J].地球物理学报,46(5):667--675.
    陈有发,陆阳泉.1981.地电阻率年变化的方向性与中国大陆构造应力场[J].地震学报,3(1):32--40.
    陈有发.1993.受压岩石电阻率的方向性及其在地震预报中的应用[J].华南地震,13(3):1--8.
    杜学彬,马占虎,叶青,谭大诚,陈军营.2006.与强地震有关的视电阻率各向异性变化[J].地球物理学进展,21(1):93--100.
    杜学彬,李宁,叶青,马占虎,闰睿.2007.强地震附近视电阻率各向异性变化的原因[J].地球物理学报,50(6):1802--1810.
    杜学彬.2010.在地震预报中的两类视电阻率变化[J].中国科学:地球科学,40(10):1321--1330.
    金耀,张天中,华正兴,徐明发,黄平章.1983.单轴压缩下多裂隙含水岩样电阻率变化与体积应变[J].地震学报,5(1):99--105.
    兰州地震研究所.1982.国外对地电阻率法预报地震的研究[M].兰州:兰州地震研究所:1--250.
    陆阳泉,温新民.1980.三向压缩下大型混凝土标本的电性特征[J].西北地震学报,2(4):55--60.
    陆阳泉,钱家栋,刘建毅.1988.砂岩在摩擦滑动中的电阻率变化及其在地震预报中的应用[J].西北地震学报,10(3):53--56.
    陆阳泉,钱家栋,刘建毅.1990a.大型花岗岩标本缓慢膨胀破裂过程中电阻率和声发射前兆特征的实验研究[J].西北地震学报,12(2):35--41.
    陆阳泉,王玉祥,温新民.1990b.受压岩(土)体电阻率变化的原地实验及大地震前后地电异常的初步分析[G]∥第二届构造物理学术讨论会文集.北京:地震出版社:158--168.
    吕广廷,赵广堃,谢原定,金铭,蒋续媛.1984.应力作用下层状砂岩电阻率的变化特征[J].西北地震学报,6(1):11--16.
    张金铸,陆阳泉.1983.不同三轴应力条件下岩石电阻率变化的试验研究[J].地震学报,5(4):440--445.
    张天中,华正兴,徐明发.1985.1.2千巴围压下岩样破裂和摩擦滑动过程中电阻率变化[J].地震学报,7(4):428--433.
    张同俊.1981.矿井岩层受力状态与视电阻率关系的实验研究[J].西北地震学报,3(1):1--24.
    赵玉林,钱复业,扬体成.1983.原地电阻率变化的实验[J].地震学报,5(2):217--225.
    Stopin′ski W.1992.用电阻率测量法检测在加载条件下介质的动力过程[J].地震学报,14(2):220--228.
    Brace W F,Orange A S,Madden T R.1965.The effect of pressure on the electrical resistivity of water-saturated crystal-line rocks[J].J Geophys Res,70(22):5669--5678.
    Brace W F,Orange A S.1966.Electrical resistivity changes in saturated rocks due to stress[J].Science,153(3743):1525--1526.
    Brace W F,Orange A S.1968a.Electrical resistivity changes in saturated rocks during fracture and frictional sliding[J].J Geophys Res,73(4):1433--1445.
    Brace W F,Orange A S.1968b.Further studies of the effect of pressure on the electrical resistivity of rocks[J].J Geo-phys Res,73(16):5407--5420.
    Brace W F.1975.Dilatancy-related electrical resistivity changes in rocks[J].Pure Appl Geophys,113(1--2):207--217.
    Kurite K.1986.How can we identify location of a fracture plane?Anisotropy of electrical conductivity and seismicvelocity in dilatancy[J].Earthq Pred Res,4(1--2):39--45.
    Teisseyre K.1989.Anisotropy of electric resistivity related to crack processes before fracturing[J].Acta Geophys Pol,37(2):185--192.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心