1755年里斯本大地震与2008年汶川大地震灾后恢复重建比较
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
1755年里斯本大地震是欧洲历史上最具破坏力、最具影响力的地震之一,2008年汶川大地震是中国近年来发生的典型巨灾,两者灾后恢复重建均产生深远影响和意义.1755年里斯本大地震和2008年汶川大地震虽然发生在不同时代、不同地理位置和不同社会性质下,但在自然环境、人文环境和社会环境等方面却有相似之处,具有一定可比性.本文主要将两者灾后恢复重建的政府主导、整体规划、融资方式和心理干预4方面进行比较,分析两者在恢复重建中存在的困难和取得的进步,最终得出针对我国恢复重建的相关建议:将"以人为本"根植于政府主导的恢复重建模式;整体规划重点体现整体性、全局性和前瞻性;坚持多种融资方式并存,并严格监管;在专业人才、组织管理体系和法律法规等方面完善心理干预.
The 1755 Lisbon earthquake was one of the most destructive earthquakes in Europe,and the2008 Wenchuan earthquake is a typical catastrophe in many years in China.Both had far-reaching impact and significance for restoration and reconstruction.The 1755 Lisbon earthquake and the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake happened at different times,at different locations and with different natures of society,but the natural environment,human environment and social environment are rather similar and comparable.Post-disaster recovery and reconstruction of the two earthquakes were compared,from four aspects:government lead,overall planning,finance,and psychological intervention.The difficulties encountered and progresses made were analyzed.Suggestions for restoration and reconstruction were put forward.First,"people-oriented"principle should dominate government-led recovery and reconstruction.Second,the planning should stress overall outlook,global and forward-looking strategy.Third,different financing modes should be applied,under strict supervision.Forth,professional personnel,organization and management,and laws and regulations should be stressed to improve psychological intervention.
引文
[1]克里斯提安娜·埃费尔特,景德祥.1755年里斯本大地震:论一场自然灾害的历史影响力[J].史学理论研究,2005(2):107
    [2]赵伯明,徐锡伟.汶川Ms 8.0地震断层与地震灾害初步分析[J].地震地质,2008(4):839
    [3]Oliveira C S.Review of the 1755Lisbon earthquake based on recent analyses of historical observations[C]∥Frechet J,Meghraoui M,Stucchi M.Modern approaches in solid earth sciences.Dordrecht:Springer,2008:261
    [4]Carvalho A,Costa A C,Oliveira C S.A finite-fault modeling of the 1755 Lisbon earthquake sources[C]∥MendesVictor L A,Oliveira C S,Azevedo J,et al.Geotechnical geological and earthquake engineering.Dordrecht:Springer,2009:433
    [5]Muir-Wood R,Mignan A.A phenomenological reconstruction of the Mw 9 November 1st 1755earthquake source[C]∥MendesVictor L A,Oliveira C S,Azevedo J,et al.Geotechnical geological and earthquake engineering.Dordrecht:Springer,2009:121
    [6]Fuchs K.The great earthquakes of Lisbon 1755and Aceh2004shook the world[C]∥MendesVictor L A,Oliveira C S,Azevedo J,et al.Geotechnical geological and earthquake engineering.Dordrecht:Springer,2009:43
    [7]武玉霞.里斯本地震——欧洲地震科学研究的先河[J].城市与减灾,2007(4):39
    [8]Brillinger D R,Bolt B A.A statistical study of the seismic intensities of the 1755Lisbon earthquake[C]∥MendesVictor L A,Oliveira C S,Azevedo J,et al.Geotechnical geological and earthquake engineering.Dordrecht:Springer,2009:455
    [9]王旭东.世界灾难史上的谣言与祸害[J].人民论坛,2011(10):28
    [10]孟庆龙,王旭东.自然启示录:1755年里斯本地震海啸对葡萄牙社会的冲击和影响[J].史学理论研究,2005(2):96
    [11]Azevedo J,Serrano S,Oliveira C S.The next 1755-Myth and reality;priorities and actions to develop in case of an earthquake in the Lisbon metropolitan area[C]∥MendesVictor L A,Oliveira C S,Azevedo J,et al.Geotechnical geological and earthquake engineering.Dordrecht:Springer,2009:559
    [12]阿真.里斯本:从地震重创中复苏的古城[J].中华民居,2008(1):114
    [13]温玉婷,李宁,刘雪琴,等.汶川地震与唐山地震损失与救助之对比[J].灾害学,2010,25(2):68
    [14]殷跃平.汶川八级地震地质灾害研究[J].工程地质学报,2008(4):433
    [15]蓝红星,郑长德.“5·12”汶川特大地震灾区恢复重建发展的经验及对策研究[J].安徽农业科学,2011(6):3588
    [16]钟开斌.汶川地震灾后恢复重建政策执行:主要困境和对策建议[J].中国软科学,2008(12):18
    [17]邱建.“5·12”汶川地震灾后恢复重建城乡规划设计[J].建筑学报,2010(9):5
    [18]徐玖平,卢毅.地震救援·恢复·重建的组织技术及理论模式[J].系统工程理论与实践2011(S1):107
    [19]贾燕.地震灾区恢复重建研究[M].北京:中国地震局地质研究所,2006:117
    [20]曲丹,牛海波.试论灾后心理干预机制构建[J].重庆广播电视大学学报,2010(2):57
    [21]翟月玲.汶川大地震中长期“心理重建”的政府责任[J].医学与哲学(人文社会医学版),2010(2):42
    [22]谢开勇,徐艺萄,简杰.汶川地震灾区恢复重建中人力资源状况调查与分析[J].决策咨询,2011(3):85

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心