构造煤的地震可识别性特征
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
为了研究构造煤的地震特征及可识别性,根据常温常压条件下超声测量所揭示的原生结构煤与构造煤的弹性特征,建立了3种典型的煤层夹构造煤地震地质模型;利用反射率法计算了这3种模型的PP波与PS波地震响应;在不同频率下对比分析了构造煤所处位置及厚度大小对煤层反射的影响及其AVO特征。结果发现:构造煤夹层的存在使煤层反射系数增大;频率越低、构造煤厚度越大,增加的倍数越高;相同条件下PP波反射系数的增幅高于PS波;在低频情况下,构造煤在煤层中的空间位置变化在煤层反射的相位上存在异常。从而从理论上证明利用现有的纵波地震反演技术,理论上可以预测构造煤的存在;PS波信息的加入有助于提高单纯PP波预测的精度,尤其对构造煤空间位置的确定,PS波相位具有优于PP波的敏感性。
To analyze the seismic characters and recognition of deformed coal,according to the ultrasonic elastic characteristics of deformed coals under room temperature and normal press,three typical seismic geological models were initially designed. Seismic responses of these three models were simulated with reflectivity method,and their AVO characteristics were analyzed and focused on the influence of the deformed coal's spatial location and thickness on seismic response in different frequencies. The comparisons show that the existence of deformed coal changes the reflection coefficients of coals models,and the amplitudes of reflection coefficients increase. With the lower frequency of the incident waves and the thicker of the deformed coal,the multiple increases significantly. Amplitude's growth rates of PP-wave reflection coefficients are higher than those of PS-wave under the same conditions. Applied jointly with the thickness prediction technology of coal seam,the phase of reflection coefficient can be used to distinguish the relative spatial locations between deformed and un-deformed coals in terms of low frequency. Only using P-wave seismic inversion technique,the deformed coals can be predicted in theory. However,the precision will be improved if PS-wave is considered at the same time,especially for the spatial location prediction of deformed coal.
引文
[1]张子敏,张玉贵.瓦斯地质规律与瓦斯预测[M].北京:煤炭工业出版社,2005.
    [2]Antonio CBRamos,Thomas L Davis.3-D AVO analysis and modeling applied to fracture detection in coalbed methane reservoirs[J].Geophysics,1997,62(6):1683-1695.
    [3]张爱敏,汪洋,赵世尊.不同厚度煤层AVO特征及模型研究[J].中国矿业大学学报,1997,26(3):36-41.Zhang Aimin,Wang Yang,Zhao Shizun.AVO character and its modeling research for different thickness coal bed[J].Journal of China University of Mining and Technology,1997,26(3):36-41.
    [4]彭苏萍,高云峰.含煤地层振幅随偏移距变化正演模型研究[J].科学通报,2005,50(S1):131-137.Peng Supeng,Gao Yunfeng.Study on the AVO forward modeling of the coal bearing strata[J].Chinese Science Bulletin,2005,50(S1):131-137.
    [5]Dong Shouhua,Yue Jianhua.Forward modeling of the relationship between reflection coefficient and incident angle of the P-wave in a coal seam[J].Journal of China University of Mining&Technology,2006,16(1):5-8.
    [6]陈同俊,崔若飞,刘恩儒.构造煤AVO特征及正演模拟研究[J].地球物理学进展,2008,23(5):1610-1615.Chen Tongjun,Cui Ruofei,Liu Enru.AVO forward modeling for VTI coal[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2008,23(5):1610-1615.
    [7]陈同俊,崔若飞,刘恩儒.VTI型构造煤AVO正演模拟[J].煤炭学报,2009,34(4):439-442.Chen Tongjun,Cui Ruofei,Liu Enru.AVO forward modeling for VTI coal[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2009,34(4):439-442.
    [8]陈同俊,王新,崔若飞.基于方位AVO正演的HTI构造煤裂隙可探测性分析[J].煤炭学报,2010,35(4):640-644.Chen Tongjun,Wang Xin,Cui Ruofei.The detectability on HTI tectonic coal cracks by azimuthal AVO’s forward modeling[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2010,35(4):640-644.
    [9]杜文凤,彭苏萍,王珂,等.瓦斯突出煤和非突出煤AVO响应的比较[J].中国煤炭地质,2010,22(6):45-48,58.Du Wenfeng,Peng Supeng,Wang Ke,et al.AVO response comparison between gas outburst coal and non-outburst coal[J].Coal Geology of China,2010,22(6):45-48,58.
    [10]王赟,许小凯,张玉贵.六种不同变质程度煤的纵横波速度特征及其与密度的关系[J].地球物理学报,2012,55(11):3754-3761.Wang Yun,Xu Xiaokai,Zhang Yugui.Characteristics of P-wave and S-wave velocities and their relationships with density of six metamorphic kinds of coals[J].Chinese J.Geophys.,2012,55(11):3754-3761.
    [11]王赟,张玉贵,许小凯.六种不同变质程度煤的最大镜质组反射率与弹性参数的关系[J].地球物理学报,2013,56(6):2116-2122.Wang Yun,Zhang Yugui,Xu Xiaokai.Relationship between the maximum vitrinite reflectance and the elastic parameters of coal:A lab ultrasonic measurement of 6 metamorphic kinds of coals[J].Chinese J.Geophys.,2013,56(6):2116-2122.
    [12]王赟,许小凯,杨德义.常温压条件下五种变质程度构造煤的超声弹性特征[J].中国科学:地球科学,2014,44(11):2431-2439.Wang Yun,Xu Xiaokai,Yang Deyi.2014.Ultrasonic elastic characteristics of five kinds of metamorphic deformed coals under room temperature and pressure conditions[J].Science China:Earth Sciences,2014,57:2208-2216,doi:10.1007/s11430-014-4922-4.
    [13]许小凯,王赟,孟召平.六种不同煤阶的品质因子特征[J].地球物理学报,2014,57(2):644-650.Xu Xiaokai,Wang Yun,Meng Zhaoping.Quality factor characteristics of six metamorphic kinds of coals[J].Chinese J.Geophys.,2014,57(2):644-650.
    [14]Fuchs K,Müller G.Computation of synthetic seismograms with the reflectivity method and comparison with observations[J].Geophys.J.Roy.Astr.Soc.,1971,23(4):417-433.
    [15]汪恩华,贺振华,李庆忠.基于薄层的反射系数谱理论与模型正演[J].成都理工学院学报,2001,28(1):70-74.Wang Enhua,He Zhenhua,Li Qingzhong.Reflectance spectrum theory and model computation based on thin beds[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology,2001,28(1):70-74.
    [16]杨春,王赟,芦俊.关于薄层与单界面模型弹性反透射系数的讨论[A].中国地球物理学会第二十七届年会论文集[C].2011.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心