会昌地震台相同测点倾斜固体潮观测之对比分析
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
通过对会昌地震台2007-07~2011-06相同测点倾斜固体潮资料的对比分析,可以看出垂直摆资料质量稍优于水管仪资料,两种资料存在着一定的可比性。其主要的相同之处表现在于年变趋势动态、日变形态和降雨、强远震波动、潮汐因子的时间同步性上;而NS向线性倾变、潮汐因子定量化和高频信号频谱等方面存在一定差异。这种差异主要可能为观测山洞的环境条件和仪器工作特性的不同。为改善地倾斜资料高频信息记录能力,建议提高仪器采样率和改进仪器频率响应设计。
Through contrastive analysis on the Earth's tidal tilt data from Jul.2007 to Jun.2011 between DSQ water pipe and VS Vertical pendulum tiltometers in Huichang Seismic Station,the paper concludes that the quality of the vertical pendulum data is slightly superior to that of the water pipe data,in view of certain comparability between the two.The two said data are similar in the annual variation trend,daily variation form,as well as the time synchronization of the rainfall,wave motion of strong and distant earthquakes and the tidal factors,but are different in terms of NS-oriented linear tilt change,quantification of tidal factors and frequency spectrum of high frequency signals.These differences are probably caused mainly by different environmental conditions of the observation cave and performance characteristics of the instruments.As a result,it is suggested to improve the sampling rate and frequency response design of the observation instruments,so as to improve our capability to record high frequency information for the ground tilt data.
引文
[1]牛安福,江在森.我国地形变观测预报地震的现状及对地震预测问题的思考[J].国际地震动态,2005,317(5):174-178.
    [2]罗荣祥,杨惠荣,地倾斜观测资料的归算[J].西北地震学报,1995,17(1):77-79.
    [3]吴翼麟,孔祥元.特种精密工程测量[M].北京:测绘出版社,1993.
    [4]中国地震局监测预报司编.地壳形变数字观测技术[M].地震出版社,2003.
    [5]蒋骏.地震前兆信息处理与软件系统EIS2000[M].北京:地震出版社,2000.
    [6]陈德福,聂磊.液体静力水准仪及其应用[M].北京:地震出版社,2008.
    [7]张跃刚,陈绍绪,李进步,等.地倾斜资料Nakai拟合分析的映震能力[J].华北地震科学,2001,19(2):35-42.
    [8]范桂英,狄梁.常熟地倾斜几种预报方法及指标的探索[J].大地测量与地球动力学,2002,22(4):81-84.
    [9]陈德福.地壳形变动力学观测与研究[M].海洋出版社,1993.
    [10]赵爱平,李传江.南昌台水管倾斜潮汐观测对强远震地震波响应探讨[J].大地测量与地球动力学,2005,25(S1):169~175.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心