都江堰地震(M_S4.1)短期预测和流变构造分析
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
2013年6月2日22时23分,重庆万州吴达兵给曾佐勋发送了四川绵阳网友"光耀vision"于2013年6月1日19时38分拍摄的云图。通过吴达兵本人创建的"云地映对"法,初步识别出该云图对应龙门山地区。6月3日11时44分的电子邮件中,曾佐勋提出请吴达兵根据云地映对法"标注几个地名","帮助标出索状云汇聚中心点的经纬度,怀疑是震中位置",并提出似乎北面还有一个汇聚中心。当日15时17分,吴达兵给曾佐勋发来了标注地名和索状云汇聚中心经纬度(31.27°N,103.90°E)的云图。虽然北面的汇聚中心没有标注经纬度,但是地名很具体。2013年6月3日17时16分,曾佐勋在答谢吴达兵地名标注和汇聚中心经纬度标注的同时,提出了一个预测意见:利用绵阳网友拍摄云图和吴达兵云地映对标注,结合6月3日沿龙门山断裂带北段的(长条状)地球排气观测及卫星重力资料分析,预测震中应该在北川县陈家坝乡(31°N,104°E),震级应该在MS5.5±0.5,发震时间估计2个月内。曾佐勋的这一短期预测,显然重点考虑了北面汇聚中心。这是因为云图区北面索状云汇聚中心对应区的卫星重力异常梯度更加明显。2013年7月8日7时39分,在都江堰市与汶川县交接处靠近都江堰市一侧发生了MS4.1级地震,震中位置是31.3°N,103.6°E。与云图中南面汇聚中心相当一致。与曾佐勋预测的北面汇聚中心(31°N,104°E)相距仅50.6km。发震时间落入2个月预测值时间窗口。预测震级略高于实际地震的震级,误差0.9级。综合地震预测三要素与实际发生的都江堰地震三要素的对比分析,都江堰(MS4.1)地震是一次利用云地映对、地球排气与卫星重力异常相结合的成功短期预测。值得注意的是,云团中的两组索状云形成两个汇聚中心。其中一个汇聚中心已经发震,另一个汇聚中心可能孕育着下一个中、强地震。本文初步认为,弧形索状云是由于局部地面超低频震荡导致水蒸气和尘埃形成波纹。综合构造背景、卫星重力异常和该区的震源机制解分析认为,都江堰(MS4.1)地震的发震断层为北川—映秀断裂,与汶川MS8.0地震发震断层相同,为逆冲兼右行走滑性质。都江堰地震是汶川(MS8.0)地震的余震,二者具有相同的成因机制:印度板块向北推挤作用下,松潘-甘孜地块向东推覆到四川盆地之上,引起北川—映秀断裂逆冲兼右行走滑活动,造成中地壳密度突变的差异流变区积累能量突然释放。
At 22:23 of June 2,2013,Wu Dabing from Wanzhou,Chongqing emailed Zeng Zuoxun a cloud picture taken by a netizen,brilliance vision,from Mianyang,Sichuan at 19:38of June 1,2013.He primarily identified the cloud picture corresponding to the Longmenshan area by using the‘correspondence between cloud and ground'method created by himself.In the email at 11:44of June 3,2013,Zeng Zuoxun asked Wu Dabing‘to label a few place names' and‘to label the longitude and latitude of the converging center of the rope clouds,guessing it will be an epicenter',and presented that there was another converging center at the north part of the picture area.At 15:17of the same day,Wu Dabing emailed Zeng Zuoxun the cloud picture labeled some place names and the longitude and latitude(31.27°N,103.90°E)of the south converging center of the rope clouds.There is a definite place name at the north converging center although no longitude and latitude labeled there.At 17:16,June 3,2013,in his reply email expressing appreciation to Wu Dabing for the labeling of the place names and the longitude and latitude,Zeng Zuoxun made a prediction,on the basis of the cloud picture labeled,the strip degasification along the north part of the Longmenshan fracture zone and the satellite gravity anomalies of the area,that the epicenter would be in(31°N,104°E),the magnitude would be in MS5.5±0.5,the occurring time would be in 2 months.At 7:39,July 8,2013,an earthquake occurred at the border between Dujiangyan city and Wenchuan county(31.3°N,103.6°E)with magnitude of MS4.1.We name it Dujiangyan earthquake in the article.The epicenter is in accordance with the south converging center of the rope cloud and with only a distance of 50.6km from the predicted epicenter.The occurring time of the Dujiangyan earthquake fell into the time window of the two-month prediction.The magnitude of the Dujiangyan earthquake is a little bigger than the magnitude predicted with a difference of MS0.9.The comparison between the three key elements of the predicted earthquake and the Dujiangyan earthquake indicates that this is a successful short-term prediction with the observation of earthquake cloud and degasification of the earth and the analysis of the satellite gravity anomalies.It is worth to note that the two sets of rope cloud consisted of two converging centers.At one center of them the Dujiangyan earthquake occurred and at the other one there will still be the possibility to occur a next middle-strong earthquake.Aprimary assumption is that the arcuate rope clouds are formed due to the super-low vibration of the local ground surface acting on the water vapour and dust in the sky.On the basis of the comprehensive analysis of the tectonic setting,satellite gravity anomaly and the focal mechanism in this area,we consider that the BeichuanYingxiu right-lateral thrust fault is the earthquake-triggering which triggered the Wenchuan MS8.0earthquake.We think that the Dujiangyan MS4.1earthquake is an aftershock of the Wenchuan MS8.0earthquake and both have the same formation mechanism.Under the northward indentation of the India Plate,the Songpan-Ganze Block was pushed eastwards to Sichuan Basin,causing Beichuan-Yingxiu thrusting with right-lateral slip and resulting in a sudden release of the energy accumulated at the edge of the boundary between differential rheological layers.
引文
[1]曾佐勋,王杰.芦山地震:一次成功的中期预测[J].地学前缘,2013,20(3):21-24.
    [2]曾佐勋,Sibgatulin V G,宋松,等.尼玛地震(MS5.2)临震预测和流变构造[J].地学前缘,2013,20(6):149-155.
    [3]Tributsch H.Do aerosol anomalies precede earthquakes[J]?.Nature,1978,276(7):606-608.
    [4]吕大炯,高建国,孙士,等.地震云及其成因的探讨[J].自然杂志,1978,1(5):279-280.
    [5]键田忠三郎,真锅大觉,吕大炯.地震云[M].西安:陕西科学技术出版社,1981.
    [6]吕大炯.震兆云霞[M].上海:学林出版社,1982.
    [7]吕大炯.临震预报[M].南京:江苏科学技术出版社,1984.
    [8]吕大炯.地震云观测[J].科学通报,1981(3):69-71.
    [9]宋松,尹延卓.“地震云”研究的发掘与古今中外史料择选[J].宁夏大学学报:自然科学版,1985(1):70-75.
    [10]Shou Z H.Precursor of the largest earthquake in the last 40years[J].New Concepts in Global Tectonics,2006,41(4):6-15.
    [11]Harrington D,Shou Z H.Bam earthquake prediction&space technology[J].Seminars of the United Nations Programme on Space Applications,2005,16:39-63.
    [12]Shou Z H,Xia J J,Shou W Y.Using the earthquake vapor theory to explain the French airbus crash[J].Remote Sensing Letter,2010,1(2):85-94.
    [13]王杰,张雄,潘黎黎,等.芦山地震(MS7.0)前甲烷释放与大气增温异常[J].地学前缘,2013,20(6):29-35.
    [14]强祖基,马蔼乃,曾佐勋,等.卫星热红外地震短临预测方法研究[J].地学前缘,2010,17(5):254-262.
    [15]强祖基,孔令昌,郭满红,等.卫星热红外增温机制的实验研究[J].地震学报,1997,19(2):87-91.
    [16]强祖基,姚清林,魏乐军,等.从震前卫星热红外图像看中国现今构造应力场特征[J].地球学报,2009,30(6):873-884.
    [17]徐秀登,徐向民,强祖基.红外临震异常的基本特征与成因机理再认识[J].浙江师范大学报:自然科学版,1994,17(3):43-47.
    [18]徐秀登,徐向民.地震前红外异常的基本特征与成因机理[J].西北地震学报,2001,23(3):95-97.
    [19]徐秀登,徐宝华.芦山地震的红外增温异常分析[J].地学前缘,2013,20(3):25-28.
    [20]姚清林,强祖基,王弋平.青藏高原地震前CO的排放与卫星热红外增温异常[J].地球科学进展,2005,20(5):505-510.
    [21]Gao Y,Wu Z L,Liu Z.Seismic source characteristics of nine strong earthquakes from 1988to 1990and earthquake activity since 1970in the Sichuan-Qinghai-Xizang(Tibet)zone of China[J].Pure and Applied Geophysics,2000,157:1423-1443.
    [22]高原,王琼,赵博,等.龙门山断裂带中南段的一个破裂空段:芦山地震的震后效应[J].中国科学:D辑,2013,43(6):1038-1046.
    [23]唐文清,陈智梁,刘宇平,等.基于GPS技术的活动断裂监测:以鲜水河、龙门山断裂为例[J].山地学报,2007,25(1):103-107.
    [24]张培震.青藏高原东缘川西地区的现今构造变形、应变分配与深部动力过程[J].中国科学:D辑,2008,38(9):1041-1056.
    [25]焦青,杨选辉,许丽卿,等.汶川8.0级地震前后龙门山断裂活动特征浅析[J].大地测量与地球动力学,2008,28(4):7-11,37.
    [26]陈国光,计凤桔,周荣军,等.龙门山断裂带晚第四纪活动性分段的初步研究[J].地震地质,2007,29(3):657-673.
    [27]陈立春,陈杰,刘进峰,等.龙门山前山断裂北段晚第四纪活动性研究[J].地震地质,2008,30(3):710-722.
    [28]张培震,闻学泽,徐锡伟,等.2008年汶川8.0级特大地震孕育和发生的多单元组合模式[J].科学通报,2009,54(7):944-953.
    [29]唐文清,刘宇平,陈智梁,等.龙门山断裂构造带GPS研究[J].大地测量与地球动力学,2004,24(3):57-59,83.
    [30]费琪.汶川大地震的深部构造特征[J].工程地球物理学报,2008,5(4):387-395.
    [31]费琪.壳幔物质流变的底辟作用孕育大地震:卫星重力资料的证据[J].地学前缘,2009,16(3):282-293.
    [32]王谦身,滕吉文,张永谦,等.龙门山断裂系及邻区地壳重力均衡效应与汶川地震[J].地球物理学进展,2008,23(6):1664-1670.
    [33]杨巍然,曾佐勋,李德威,等.板内地震过程的三层次构造模式[J].地学前缘,2009,16(1):206-217.
    [34]齐少华,刘启元,陈九辉,等.汶川MS8.0地震:龙门山断裂两侧地壳各向异性的初步研究[J].地震地质,2009,31(3):377-388.
    [35]滕吉文,白登海,杨辉,等.2008汶川MS8.0地震发生的深层过程和动力学响应[J].地球物理学报,2008,51(5):1385-1402.
    [36]孙洁,晋光文,白登海,等.青藏高原东缘地壳、上地幔电性结构探测及其构造意义[J].中国科学:D辑,2003,33(增刊):173-180,215.
    [37]王椿镛,吴建平,楼海,等.川西藏东地区的地壳P波速度结构[J].中国科学:D辑,2003,33(增刊):181-189.
    [38]Huang J L,Zhao D P,Zheng S H.Lithospheric structure and its relationship to seismic and volcanic activity in southwest China[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,2002,107(B10):2255.
    [39]Wang C Y,Chan W W,Mooney W D.Three-dimensional velocity structure of crust and upper mantle in southwestern China and its tectonic implications[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,2003,108(B92442):176-193.
    [40]Li C,vander Hilst R D,Toksoz M N.Constraining P-wave velocity variations in upper mantle beneath Southeast Asia[J].Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors,2006,154:180-195.
    ①宋松.用“七式、六形还原测震法”测报准洛杉矶7.4级大震的总结.2007天灾预测学术研讨会议文集.北京,2007.
    ②宋松.“七式、六形还原测震法”测报准了南投等大震.2003年天灾预测研讨会议文集.北京,2003:109-115.
    ③宋松,宋科夫.2008年5·12四川大震前我们所做的年度预测和两次强余震预测.2008天灾预测学术研讨会议文集.北京,2008:213.
    ④曾佐勋,强祖基,刘江平,等.地气、动物行为异常与地震短临预测系统.第四届全国构造会议论文摘要集.北京,2008.
    ⑤曾佐勋,强祖基,王杰.震前多点排气的地震预测方法探索.全国灾害预测研讨会报告.北京,2010.
    ⑥王杰,曾佐勋,莫皓然.强震前地球排气现象的两个实例.第五届全国构造地质学与地球动力学学术研讨会论文摘要集.武汉,2012.
    ①CMT:http:∥www.globalcmt.org
    ②中国地震局地球物理研究所:http:∥www.cea-igp.ac.cn
    ①Ries J C,Bettadpur S,Poole S,et al.Mean Background Gravity Fields for GRACE Processing,GRACE Science Team Meeting,Austin,TX,8-10 August 2011.ftp:∥ftp.csr.utexas.edu/pub/grace/GIF48/GSTM2011_Ries_etal.pdf

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心