时滞对桥梁半主动控制和主动控制的影响
|
摘要
桥梁减震半主动控制和主动控制系统中会存在一系列时滞因素,为了探讨时滞对桥梁控制效果的影响规律,建立桥梁的有限元模型和减震控制方程,并考虑控制系统不同的滞后时间,采用粘滞阻尼器对一座大跨连续梁桥进行了减震控制地震反应数值计算。结果表明,时间滞后对半主动控制和主动控制的影响趋势基本相同,均会使控制系统的减震效果随着滞后时间的增大而越来越差,甚至会增大桥梁地震反应和使地震反应发散,但是半主动控制出现减震效果为零的滞后时间和地震反应发散的滞后时间均比主动控制更加长一点,这显示了半主动控制的优越性。
There are some time-delay factors in the systems of semi-active control and active control for bridge.In order to explore the influence laws of time-delay on bridge control effectiveness,the bridge finite element model and the seismic mitigation control equation are setup.With different lag time of control system,the vibration control seismic response calculation and analysis for a long-span continuous beam bridge are performed with viscous dampers.The results indicate that the influence trends of time-delay on semi-active control and active control are almost the same.Time-delay can make the vibration-suppressed effectiveness of the two control systems worse with lag time longer.It can augment the seismic responses of bridge and can make the seismic responses instable.The lag time with which vibration-suppressed effectiveness is zero and the lag time with which seismic response is instable of semiactive control are all longer than those of active control.This shows the advantage of semi-active control.
There are some time-delay factors in the systems of semi-active control and active control for bridge.In order to explore the influence laws of time-delay on bridge control effectiveness,the bridge finite element model and the seismic mitigation control equation are setup.With different lag time of control system,the vibration control seismic response calculation and analysis for a long-span continuous beam bridge are performed with viscous dampers.The results indicate that the influence trends of time-delay on semi-active control and active control are almost the same.Time-delay can make the vibration-suppressed effectiveness of the two control systems worse with lag time longer.It can augment the seismic responses of bridge and can make the seismic responses instable.The lag time with which vibration-suppressed effectiveness is zero and the lag time with which seismic response is instable of semiactive control are all longer than those of active control.This shows the advantage of semi-active control.
引文
1孙清,张智谦,周进雄,等.时滞对结构振动半主动控制效果的影响.应用力学学报,2002,19(3):77-80
2孙清,伍晓红,戴红,等.结构振动半主动控制系统的时滞补偿研究.机械科学与技术,2005,24(5):505-509
3欧进萍.结构振动控制———主动、半主动和智能控制.北京:科学出版社,2003:1-540
4范立础.桥梁抗震.上海:同济大学出版社,1997:1-312
5丁皓江,何福保.谢贻权,等.弹性和塑性力学中的有限单元法.北京:机械工业出版社,1989:1-215
6胡聿贤.地震工程学.北京:地震出版社,1988:1-692
7 Soong T T.Active Structural Control Theory and Practice.LongmanScientific&Technical,UK,1990:1-194
8田石柱,李暄,欧进萍.结构主动控制系统时间滞后测量与补偿方法.地震工程与工程振动,2000,20(4):101-105
9徐龙河,周云,李忠献.MRFD半主动控制系统的时滞与补偿.地震工程与工程振动,2001,21(3):127-131
2孙清,伍晓红,戴红,等.结构振动半主动控制系统的时滞补偿研究.机械科学与技术,2005,24(5):505-509
3欧进萍.结构振动控制———主动、半主动和智能控制.北京:科学出版社,2003:1-540
4范立础.桥梁抗震.上海:同济大学出版社,1997:1-312
5丁皓江,何福保.谢贻权,等.弹性和塑性力学中的有限单元法.北京:机械工业出版社,1989:1-215
6胡聿贤.地震工程学.北京:地震出版社,1988:1-692
7 Soong T T.Active Structural Control Theory and Practice.LongmanScientific&Technical,UK,1990:1-194
8田石柱,李暄,欧进萍.结构主动控制系统时间滞后测量与补偿方法.地震工程与工程振动,2000,20(4):101-105
9徐龙河,周云,李忠献.MRFD半主动控制系统的时滞与补偿.地震工程与工程振动,2001,21(3):127-131
版权所有：© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心