混凝土拱桥拱上建筑轻型化研究
|
摘要
制约混凝土拱桥向更大跨度发展的主要问题是结构自重大和施工架设困难。为提高混凝土拱桥的竞争力和促进该桥型的进一步发展,以420 m跨径的重庆万州长江大桥为工程背景,通过桥道系连续化和采用组合结构代替原有混凝土结构等方式来进行混凝土拱桥拱上建筑轻型化研究。与原设计在静力性能和地震响应分析的比较结果表明,桥道系连续化对减轻拱上建筑结构自重的效率较低,其静力性能与抗震性能提高也不大;而采用组合结构可使得拱上建筑结构自重减轻35%,拱脚轴力和弯矩分别降低了16%和17%,三向地震作用下的拱脚横向弯矩和拱顶横向位移分别减小了13%和18%,拱脚纵向弯矩、轴力分别降低了45%和44%,具有可行性。
Development of long-span RC arch bridges are restricted by two critical factors,the heavy self-weight and the difficult construction techniques.In order to advance the competitiveness and further application,researches on reducing the self-weight of spandrel structures of RC arch are conducted by either making the deck from simply supported to continuous or utilizing composite structure in Wanxian Yangtze River Bridge with a main span of 420 m.The results of the trial design by using composite structure show that with comparison of the original bridge the self-weight of spandrel structure is reduced by 35%,and the axial force and bending moment of arch springing is decreased by 16% and 17%.Simultaneously,the bending moment seismic response of arch springing in longitudinal and transverse direction reduce 45% and 13% under the three-directional ground motions and the axial force of arch springing in longitudinal direction reduce 44% and the deflection of arch crown in the transverse direction reduce 18%.The composite structure is superior to the continuous girder solution in the static and seismic performance which is feasible in practical application.
Development of long-span RC arch bridges are restricted by two critical factors,the heavy self-weight and the difficult construction techniques.In order to advance the competitiveness and further application,researches on reducing the self-weight of spandrel structures of RC arch are conducted by either making the deck from simply supported to continuous or utilizing composite structure in Wanxian Yangtze River Bridge with a main span of 420 m.The results of the trial design by using composite structure show that with comparison of the original bridge the self-weight of spandrel structure is reduced by 35%,and the axial force and bending moment of arch springing is decreased by 16% and 17%.Simultaneously,the bending moment seismic response of arch springing in longitudinal and transverse direction reduce 45% and 13% under the three-directional ground motions and the axial force of arch springing in longitudinal direction reduce 44% and the deflection of arch crown in the transverse direction reduce 18%.The composite structure is superior to the continuous girder solution in the static and seismic performance which is feasible in practical application.
引文
[1]陈宝春,叶琳.我国大跨度钢筋混凝土拱桥的现状调查与发展方向分析[J].中外公路,2008,28(2):89-96.
[2]韦建刚,陈宝春.国外大跨度混凝土拱桥的应用与研究进展[J].世界桥梁,2009,(2):4-8.
[3]Candrlic V,Bleiziffer J,Mandic A.Bakar Bridge inReactive Power Concrete[C]//Proceedings of theThird International Conference on Arch Bridge.PariesFrance,2001:695-700.
[4]Candrlic V,Radic J,Gukov I.Research of ConcreteArch Bridges up to 1000 m in Span[C]//Arch BridgeIV,Advances in Assessment,Structural Design andConstruction,Proceedings of the Fourth InternationalConference on Arch Bridge.Barcelona Spain,2004:538-547.
[5]Spielmann A.Un Arc de 600 Metres[C]//Proceed-ings of the Third International Conference on ArchBridge.Paries France,2001:683-692.
[6]日本土木学会.コニケリート長大ァーチ橋-支間600 mクラヌーの設計施工[M].东京:日本土木学会,2003.
[7]王远洋.波形钢腹板混凝土箱拱试设计研究[D].福州:福州大学,2007.
[8]黄卿维.钢腹板-混凝土拱面内受力性能研究[D].福州:福州大学,2009.
[9]缪锋.钢腹杆-混凝土组合拱桥试设计研究[D].福州:福州大学,2009.
[10]陈宝春.钢管混凝土拱桥(第二版)[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2007.
[11]范瑛,梅利芳.日本富士川混凝土拱桥的设计与施工[J].世界桥梁,2002,(2):14-16.
[12]David G,Robert T.The New Mike O'callaghan PatTillman Memorial Bridge at Hoover Dam[C]∥Pro-ceedings of the Sixth International Conference on ArchBridge.Fuzhou China,2010:1-8.
[13]林尔渺.横梁间距、刚度对大跨度叠合梁斜拉桥承载力的影响[D].福州:福州大学,2002.
[14]陈宝春,黄卿维.波形钢腹板PC箱梁桥应用综述[J].公路,2005,(7):45-53.
[15]四川省交通厅,四川省公路规划勘察设计研究院,四川公路桥梁建设集团有限公司.万县长江公路大桥技术总结[M].成都:电子科技大学出版社,2001.
[16]JTG D60-2004.公路桥涵设计通用规范[S].
[17]谢旭.桥梁结构地震响应分析与抗震设计[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2006.
[2]韦建刚,陈宝春.国外大跨度混凝土拱桥的应用与研究进展[J].世界桥梁,2009,(2):4-8.
[3]Candrlic V,Bleiziffer J,Mandic A.Bakar Bridge inReactive Power Concrete[C]//Proceedings of theThird International Conference on Arch Bridge.PariesFrance,2001:695-700.
[4]Candrlic V,Radic J,Gukov I.Research of ConcreteArch Bridges up to 1000 m in Span[C]//Arch BridgeIV,Advances in Assessment,Structural Design andConstruction,Proceedings of the Fourth InternationalConference on Arch Bridge.Barcelona Spain,2004:538-547.
[5]Spielmann A.Un Arc de 600 Metres[C]//Proceed-ings of the Third International Conference on ArchBridge.Paries France,2001:683-692.
[6]日本土木学会.コニケリート長大ァーチ橋-支間600 mクラヌーの設計施工[M].东京:日本土木学会,2003.
[7]王远洋.波形钢腹板混凝土箱拱试设计研究[D].福州:福州大学,2007.
[8]黄卿维.钢腹板-混凝土拱面内受力性能研究[D].福州:福州大学,2009.
[9]缪锋.钢腹杆-混凝土组合拱桥试设计研究[D].福州:福州大学,2009.
[10]陈宝春.钢管混凝土拱桥(第二版)[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2007.
[11]范瑛,梅利芳.日本富士川混凝土拱桥的设计与施工[J].世界桥梁,2002,(2):14-16.
[12]David G,Robert T.The New Mike O'callaghan PatTillman Memorial Bridge at Hoover Dam[C]∥Pro-ceedings of the Sixth International Conference on ArchBridge.Fuzhou China,2010:1-8.
[13]林尔渺.横梁间距、刚度对大跨度叠合梁斜拉桥承载力的影响[D].福州:福州大学,2002.
[14]陈宝春,黄卿维.波形钢腹板PC箱梁桥应用综述[J].公路,2005,(7):45-53.
[15]四川省交通厅,四川省公路规划勘察设计研究院,四川公路桥梁建设集团有限公司.万县长江公路大桥技术总结[M].成都:电子科技大学出版社,2001.
[16]JTG D60-2004.公路桥涵设计通用规范[S].
[17]谢旭.桥梁结构地震响应分析与抗震设计[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2006.
版权所有：© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心