多运营模式下地铁的超静孔压分布特征与动力累积变形规律
|
摘要
以往地铁隧道沉陷研究主要局限于不排水条件下的洞周土体动强度和液化及累积塑性变形等方面,但对排水条件循环荷载下超静孔压和累积塑性变形研究不足。结合地铁的正常运营状况,针对南京地铁河西段粉砂土工程地质特点,开展排水条件下循环荷载三轴实验。在获得可靠的动参数和动变形基础上,运用GeoStudio有限元软件建立二维地基-隧道有限元模型,对地铁多运营模式下隧道地基土的排水条件循环荷载动力响应非线性分析,得到运行方式和运行速度等因素影响下隧道洞周位移和超静孔压的动力响应性状。结果表明:双向运行时隧道上方的竖向位移响应值小于单向运行时的竖向位移响应值。而洞周超静孔压与之相反;列车运行速度为35 km/h的超静孔压响应值大于60 km/h的响应值,竖向位移无明显差异。列车低速产生的振动频率相对较低,能量衰减越慢,所以产生较大的超静孔压,与实测在规律上相符合。
The subsidence research of tunnel in the past was restricted to the dynamic strength,liquidation and cumulative plastic deformation of the soil around tunnel under the undrained condition.The studies on the excess pore water pressure and the cumulative plastic deformation under cyclic loading under the drainage conditions were not enough.Combined with the normal operating state of the subway and geological engineering characteristics of silty sands in Hexi area of Nanjing,triaxial tests under cyclic loading under the drainage conditions were carried out.On the basis of reliable parameters and dynamic deformation,a twodimensional finite element model of subsoil-tunnel was established by the GeoStudio finite element software.Nonlinear analysis of dynamic response of subsoil under cyclic loading under the drainage condition was given.The characteristics of vibration responses of the subsoil displacement and excess pore water pressure were obtained in various operation modes,which were influenced by operational mode and operational speed and other factors.Results showed that the vertical displacement response above the tunnel during bi-directional running was less than that during one-way running,on the contrary,the response of excess pore water pressure around the hole during bi-directional running was greater than that during one-way running.The response value of excess pore water pressure at the speed of 35 km / h was greater than that at 60 km / h,while the vertical displacement was almost the same.When the train ran slowly,the vibration frequency was relatively low and the energy attenuated more slowly,thus producing a large excess pore water pressure.It was consistent with the actual measured conditions.
The subsidence research of tunnel in the past was restricted to the dynamic strength,liquidation and cumulative plastic deformation of the soil around tunnel under the undrained condition.The studies on the excess pore water pressure and the cumulative plastic deformation under cyclic loading under the drainage conditions were not enough.Combined with the normal operating state of the subway and geological engineering characteristics of silty sands in Hexi area of Nanjing,triaxial tests under cyclic loading under the drainage conditions were carried out.On the basis of reliable parameters and dynamic deformation,a twodimensional finite element model of subsoil-tunnel was established by the GeoStudio finite element software.Nonlinear analysis of dynamic response of subsoil under cyclic loading under the drainage condition was given.The characteristics of vibration responses of the subsoil displacement and excess pore water pressure were obtained in various operation modes,which were influenced by operational mode and operational speed and other factors.Results showed that the vertical displacement response above the tunnel during bi-directional running was less than that during one-way running,on the contrary,the response of excess pore water pressure around the hole during bi-directional running was greater than that during one-way running.The response value of excess pore water pressure at the speed of 35 km / h was greater than that at 60 km / h,while the vertical displacement was almost the same.When the train ran slowly,the vibration frequency was relatively low and the energy attenuated more slowly,thus producing a large excess pore water pressure.It was consistent with the actual measured conditions.
引文
[1]陈春霞.软土中已运营地铁隧道的现场动力试验与分析研究[D].上海:同济大学,2008.
[2]王明飞.地铁列车振动引起饱和粉土地基动力响应及液化[D].北京:北京交通大学,2009.
[3]Kazuya Y,Toyotoshi Y,Kazutoshi H.Cyclic strength and deformation of normally consolidation clay[J].Soils and Foundations,1982,22(3):77-91.
[4]Shahu J T,Sharma A,Sharma K G.Numerical Modelling of Railway Tracks with Ballast and SubBallast Layers using Critical State Parameters[J].International Association for Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics,2008,1(6):4400-4408.
[5]骆冠勇,潘泓,曹洪,等.承压水减压引起的沉降分析[J].岩土力学,2004,25(增刊2):196-200.
[6]谢定义.土动力学[M].西安:西安交通大学出版社,1987.
[7]陈国兴.岩土地震工程学[M].北京:科学出版社,2007.
[8]潘昌实,Pande G N.黄土隧道列车动荷载响应有限元初步数定分析研究[J].土木工程学报,1984,17(4):19-28.
[9]梁波,蔡英.不平顺条件下高速铁路路基的动力分析[J].铁道学报,1999,21(2):84-118.
[10]梁波,罗红,孙常新.高速铁路振动荷载的模拟研究[J].铁道学报,2006,28(4):89-94.
[2]王明飞.地铁列车振动引起饱和粉土地基动力响应及液化[D].北京:北京交通大学,2009.
[3]Kazuya Y,Toyotoshi Y,Kazutoshi H.Cyclic strength and deformation of normally consolidation clay[J].Soils and Foundations,1982,22(3):77-91.
[4]Shahu J T,Sharma A,Sharma K G.Numerical Modelling of Railway Tracks with Ballast and SubBallast Layers using Critical State Parameters[J].International Association for Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics,2008,1(6):4400-4408.
[5]骆冠勇,潘泓,曹洪,等.承压水减压引起的沉降分析[J].岩土力学,2004,25(增刊2):196-200.
[6]谢定义.土动力学[M].西安:西安交通大学出版社,1987.
[7]陈国兴.岩土地震工程学[M].北京:科学出版社,2007.
[8]潘昌实,Pande G N.黄土隧道列车动荷载响应有限元初步数定分析研究[J].土木工程学报,1984,17(4):19-28.
[9]梁波,蔡英.不平顺条件下高速铁路路基的动力分析[J].铁道学报,1999,21(2):84-118.
[10]梁波,罗红,孙常新.高速铁路振动荷载的模拟研究[J].铁道学报,2006,28(4):89-94.
版权所有：© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心