低周反复荷载下高速铁路桥墩损伤评估
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
以京沪高铁沿线简支梁桥桥墩为试验原型,对6个缩尺比为1∶5的桥墩试验模型进行低周反复荷载试验,并采用改进的刚度退化模型、Park-Ang模型和Mander-Cheng模型3种地震损伤模型对桥墩试验模型的损伤过程进行评估,研究不同损伤模型对高速铁路桥墩损伤的评估效果。研究表明:Park-Ang模型不能有效评估剪切破坏型桥墩的损伤状态,Mander-Cheng模型的评估结果离散性较大,而改进的刚度退化模型可以较好地评估高速铁路桥墩的损伤状态。结合桥墩试验模型的低周反复荷载试验结果,将高速铁路桥墩的损伤程度划分为基本无损伤、轻微损伤、中等损伤、严重损伤和完全损坏5个等级,并给出各损伤等级相应的损伤指数范围,各等级损伤指数的临界值分别为0,0.25,0.5和1。
Six one-fifth scale pier models were tested under low cyclic loading,whose prototypes were piers of simply supported beam bridges along Beijing-Shanghai high speed railway.The damage processes of test models were evaluated using the modified stiffness degradation model,Park-Ang damage model and Mander-Cheng damage model,and the effectiveness of different damage models on the damage assessment of high speed railway bridge pier was studied.The results show that the Park-Ang model cannot effectively evaluate the damage state of shear failure type pier.The evaluation results calculated by Mander-Cheng model are of higher discreteness.However,the modified stiffness degradation model can better evaluate the damage state of high speed railway bridge pier.The damage degree of high speed railway bridge pier can be classified as no damage,minor damage,moderate damage,severe damage and complete damage according to the results of low cyclic loading tests of pier models.The corresponding damage indices for each damage degree are given and the critical values for each damage degree are 0,0.25,0.5and 1respectively.
引文
[1]BERTERO R D,BERTERO V V,BERAN-GILNORE A.Performance-Based Earthquake-Resistant Design Based on Comprehensive Design Philosophy and Energy Concepts[C]//Proceedings of 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering.Mexico:International Association of Earthquake Engineering,1996.
    [2]WILLIAMS M S,VILLEMURE I,SEXSMITH R G.Evaluation of Seismic Damage Indices for Concrete Elements Loaded in Combined Shear and Flexure[J].ACI Structural Journal,1997,94(3):315-322.
    [3]赵冠远.钢筋混凝土桥梁非线性分析与基于性能的抗震设计[D].北京:北京交通大学,2006.(ZHAO Guanyuan.Nonlinear Analysis and Performance Based Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Bridges[D].Beijing:Beijing Jiaotong University,2006,in Chinese)
    [4]PARK Y J,ANG A H.Mechanic Seismic Damage Model for Reinforced Concrete[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,ASCE,1985,111(ST4):722-739.
    [5]赵冠远,张同越,陈鑫.低周反复荷载下高速铁路桥墩抗震试验研究[J].中国铁道科学,2014,35(4):38-44.(ZHAO Guanyuan,ZHANG Tongyue,CHEN Xin.Experimental Study on Seismic Performance of High-Speed Railway Bridge Pier under Low Cyclic Loading[J].China Railway Science,2014,35(4):38-44.in Chinese)
    [6]LYBAS J,SOZEN M A.Effect of Beam Strength and Stiffness on Dynamic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Coupled Walls[R].Civil Engineering Series SRS 444.Urbana:University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,1977.
    [7]ROUFAIEL M S L,MEYER C.Analytical Modeling of Hysteretic Behavior of R/C Frames[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,ASCE,1987,113(9):429-444.
    [8]MANDER J B,CHENG C T.Renewable Hinge Detailing for Bridge Columns[C]//Proceedings of Pacific Conference on Earthquake.Australia:Australian Earthquake Engineering Society,1995:197-206.
    [9]PRIESTLEY M J N,SEIBLE F,CALVI G M.Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges[M].New York:John Wiley and Sons Inc,1996.
    [10]HOSE D,SEIBLE F.Performance Evaluation Database for Concrete Bridge Components and Systems under Simulated Seismic Loads[R].California:Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center,1999.5-7.
    [11]卓卫东.桥梁延性抗震设计研究[D].上海:同济大学,2000.(ZHUO Weidong.Study on Ductile Seismic Design for Highway Bridges[D].Shanghai:Tongji University,2000.in Chinese)
    [12]PAULAY T,PRIESTLEY M J N.Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings[M].New York:John Wiley&Sons,1992.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心