艰险山区地震区铁路选线初步研究
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
研究目的:目前有效铁路规范虽然对地震区选线有一些规定,但没有结合具体的地震动参数,操作性不强。汶川大地震在艰险山区产生的次生灾害非常严重,但汶川地震不同动峰值加速度值大小与山区铁路次生灾害的严重程度是不一样的,选线设计、工程处理有很大差别,通过研究两者之间的关系,指导位于艰险山区高烈度地震区铁路(目前非常多)选线,具有非常现实的意义。研究结论:对于地震动峰值加速度为0.1 g、0.15 g的地区,铁路选线可不考虑地震因素;对于地震动峰值加速度为0.2 g、0.3 g的地区,铁路选线要考虑地震因素;对于地震动峰值加速度大于等于0.4 g的地区,铁路选线受地震因素控制,工程设置以易于修复为原则。
Research purposes: Although the current railroad standard has some stipulations to the route selection in seismic region,but does not integrate with the concrete seismic dynamic parameters,so it is difficult to put into practice.After big Wenchuan earthquake,the secondary disaster produced in mountain area was extremely serious,but the impacting grade depended on the acceleration of dynamic peak value.This paper studies the relation between the seismic acceleration of peak value and railway route selection for the purpose of directing the route selection in mountain area.Research conclusions:In the areas where the seismic acceleration of dynamic peak value is 0.1 or 0.15 g,the earthquake impacting factors may not be considered in railroad route selection.In the areas where the seismic acceleration of dynamic peak value is 0.2 or 0.3 g,the earthquake imparting factor railroad route selection must be considered in railway route selection.In the areas where the seismic acceleration of dynamic peak value is ≥0.4 g,the railway route selection is impacted by earthquake factor serously,and the railway track in these area should be easy to repair.
引文
[1]汶川地震工程震害调查及铁路工程抗震设计标准研究[R].成都:中铁二院工程集团有限责任公司,2008.
    [2]艰险山区铁路工程地震灾害防范对策研究[R].成都:中铁二院工程集团有限责任公司,2008.
    [3]2008年5月12日四川汶川8.0级地震震害特征及其对铁路交通的影响[R].成都:中铁二院工程集团有限责任公司、四川省地震局工程地震研究院,2008.
    [4]TB 10012—2007,铁路工程地质勘察规范[S].
    [5]GB 50111—2006,铁路工程抗震设计规范[S].

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心