最大动态剪力模数次增加率之预测
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
正规化最大动态剪力模数次增加率N_g之观念虽然已被提出,但是其影响因素之精确指标仍待后人研究。因此,本文深入探讨粘性土壤在现场有效覆土压力长期作用下,时间效应对最大动态剪力模数G_(max)之影响,并与剪力波速回归公式作比较,以期达到预测N_g值之目标。在一般物理性质对时间效应之影响研究中,N_g值有随塑性指数I_p值增加之趋势,而平均颗粒粒径D_(50)愈小时,N_g值愈大,且重模试体之N_g值较原状试体为小。由本文之N_g-I_p-C值之关系可知,粘土含量C相同时,若I_p值愈大,则N_g愈大。而N_g-I_p-C_a值三者之关系中,若二次压缩指数C_a值相同,则I_p值愈大时,N_g值愈大。
The idea of“the secondary increment rate of dynamic shear modulus”has been proposed for a long while.However,the influence factors of this rate is still under investigation,Therefore,the “long-term time effect”onthe maximum dynamic shear modulus G_(max) under the effective overburden pressure was studied in this article, Theregression equations of shear wave velocity were examined as well.The secondary ineronrent of normalized shearmodulus N_g was found increasing as the value of plastic index I_P increased. But,the N_g decreased as the 50% parti-cle size D_(50) inereased. The N_g of an undisturbed sample is larger that that of a remolded sample in the relationshipof N_g-D_(50). From the N_g-I_p-C relation,the N_g was becoming larger along with the I_p in the same amount ofclay C. With the same value of secondary compression index C_a,the N_g increased as the I_p increased in the N_g-I_p-C_a relationships.
引文
1HardinBO,DrnevichVP.ShearMedulusandDampinginSoils:DesignEquationsandCurves.JournaloftheSoilMechanicsandFoundationDivision,ASCE,1972,98:667~692.2RichartFEJr.ClosuretoFoundationVibrations.JournaloftheSoilMechanicsandFoundationDivision,ASCE,1961,87(NO.SM4):169~178.3AfifiSS,WoodsRD,Long-termPressureEffectsonShearModulusofSoils.JournaloftheSoilMechanicsandFoundationsDivision,ASCE,1971,97(NO,SM10):1445~1460.4AndersonDG,StokoeⅡKH.ShearMedulus:ATime-DependentMaterialProperty.DynamicGeotechnicalTesting,ASTM,STP654,1978:66一90.5李咸亨,蔡宗儒.凝聚性土壤剪力模数与压密系数之关系,研究报告NCREE-91001,地震工程研究中心,台北市,199l:l52.6林美聆,蔡明欣.台北盆地粉土质粘土之动态性质及剪力模数之长期效应.中国土木水利工程学刊,1992,19(2):35~48.7HardinBO.TheNatureofStress-StrainBehaviorforSoils.ProcofASCE,GeotechnicalEngineeringDivision,SpecialtyConferencePasadena,CA,1978,1:3~90.8RoeslerSK,AnisotropicShearMedulusduetoStressAnisotropy.JournaloftheGeotechnicaIEngineeringDivi-sion,ASCE,1976,105(NO,GT7):871~880.9LeeSHH.InvestigationofLowAmplitudeShearWaveVelocityinAnisotropicMaterial.PhDDissertation,CivilEngineeringDepartment,UniversityofTexasatAustin,1985:396.10AndersonDG,WoodsRD.TimeDependentIncreaseinShearModulusofClay.JournaloftheGeotechnicalEngineeringDivision,ASCE,1976,102(NO.GT5):525~537.11AfifiSS,RichartFEJr.StressHistoryEffectsonShearModulusofSoils.SoilsandFoundations,JSSMFE,1973.13:77~95.12Kokusho,Yoshida,Esashi.DynamicPropertiesofSoftClayforWideStrainRange.SoilsandFoundations,JSSMFE,1982,22:1~18.13林美聆,郭宝生.解压及长期效应对台北盆地淤泥质黏土动态剪力模数之影响.防灾科技研究报告(80-07),台北市,1991.14李咸亨,吴志明.台北盆地土壤之动态性质研究(Ⅲ)──下井探测法与剪力波速回归分析之探讨.防灾科技研究报告(79-04),台北市,1990.15LeeHH.AnalysisoftheMulticolli-nearityofRegressionEquationsofShearWaveVelocities.SoilandFoundatoins,JapaneseSocietyofSoilMechanicsandFoundationEngineering,1992,32(1):205~2l4.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心