用户名: 密码: 验证码:
流域生态系统服务热点与冷点时空格局特征
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:The spatial-temporal pattern of hotspots and coldspots of ecosystem services at the watershed scale
  • 作者:王壮壮 ; 张立伟 ; 李旭谱 ; 王鹏涛 ; 李英杰 ; 吕一河 ; 延军平
  • 英文作者:WANG Zhuangzhuang;ZHANG Liwei;LI Xupu;WANG Pengtao;LI Yingjie;L Yihe;YAN Junping;School of Geography and Tourism of Shaanxi Normal University;School of Tourism &Research Institute of Human Geography,Xi'an International Studies University;Center for Systems Integration and Sustainability,Michigan State University;State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences;
  • 关键词:生态系统服务 ; 生态系统服务制图与模拟 ; 热点与冷点 ; 生态保护 ; 延河流域
  • 英文关键词:ecosystem services;;ecosystem services mapping;;hotspot and coldspot;;ecological conservation;;Yanhe watershed
  • 中文刊名:生态学报
  • 英文刊名:Acta Ecologica Sinica
  • 机构:陕西师范大学地理科学与旅游学院;西安外国语大学旅游学院.人文地理研究所;密歇根州立大学系统综合与可持续发展研究中心;中国科学院生态环境研究中心;
  • 出版日期:2018-11-05 09:05
  • 出版单位:生态学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:03
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金(41601182,41871187);; 陕西省自然科学基础研究计划青年项目(2017JQ4009,2018JQ4025)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:70-81
  • 页数:12
  • CN:11-2031/Q
  • ISSN:1000-0933
  • 分类号:X171.1
摘要
生态系统服务热冷点的识别及其空间格局特征研究对生态保护规划有着重要的意义。目前有关生态系统服务热冷点的识别多采用直接分类法,缺乏对空间关系特征的综合研究。以延河流域为例,综合集成多源数据来模拟4种生态系统服务(土壤保持、植被碳固定、产水、洪水调节)的热点与冷点时空格局变化特征。主要结论为:(1)2001—2012年,延河流域土壤保持服务在流域下游高于上游,中游地区增长较快。植被碳固定服务和洪水调节服务在流域南部地区较强,且在中下游呈上升趋势。产水服务呈现"南北低、中间高"的分布格局,在流域上游呈下降趋势,在中下游呈上升趋势。(2)生态系统服务热点主要分布在延河中下游南部地区,冷点主要分布在延河上游地区。延河中下游南部地区4种生态系统服务均较强。生态系统服务保护效率最高的是延河上游。(3)延河流域林地的土壤保持服务、植被碳固定服务和洪水调节服务均强于其他土地利用类型,而产水服务较弱,湿地则相反。草地的土壤保持服务和植被碳固定服务相对较强。耕地的4种服务强于裸露地,裸露地的4种服务均较弱。湿地的土壤保持服务、植被碳固定服务和洪水调节服务保护效率最高,林地的产水服务保护效率最高。研究结果以期为流域生态系统服务保护与恢复决策提供理论支撑。
        There is a great significance for ecological protection planning to identify the hotspots and coldspots of ecosystem services and to research their spatial-temporal patterns. Nowadays,direct classification is used in identification of the hotspots and coldspots of ecosystem services,but there is no comprehensive research on the characteristics of their spatial relationships. Taking the Yanhe River basin as an example,comprehensive multi-source data integration was used to simulate the changes in the spatial-temporal patterns of hotspots and coldspots of four ecosystem services( soil conservation,vegetation carbon sequestration,water yield,and flood regulation). The main conclusions of this paper are as follows: ①During 2001—2012,the soil conservation service in the Yanhe River basin was higher in the lower reaches than in the upper reaches,while its growth in the middle reaches was rapid. The ecosystem services of vegetation carbon sequestration and flood regulation were strong in the southern region of the basin and were rising in the middle and lower reaches. The distribution pattern of water yield fit a model of "high value in north and south,and low value in middle",which shows a downward trend in the upper reaches of the basin and an upward trend in the middle and lower reaches. ② The hotspots of ecosystem services are mainly distributed in the south of the middle and lower reaches of Yanhe,while the coldspots are mainly distributed in the upper reaches of Yanhe. The four ecosystem services were all strong in the south of the middle and lower reaches of the Yanhe River. The area with the highest efficiency of ecosystem service protection was the upper reaches of Yanhe. ③ The ecosystem services of soil conservation,vegetation carbon sequestration,and flood regulation were better in forest lands in the Yanhe River basin than they were in other land-use types,while the water yield service was weaker.The wetlands were the opposite. Soil conservation and vegetation carbon sequestration were relatively better in grasslands than in other land-use types. The four services were stronger in cultivated land than in bare land,and the four services were much weaker in bare land than in other land-use types. The land-use type with the highest conservation efficiencies of soil conservation,vegetation carbon sequestration,and flood regulation was wetlands,and the land-use type with the highest conservation efficiency of water yield was forest lands. The results of this study are expected to provide theoretical support for the conservation and restoration of ecosystem services in watersheds.
引文
[1]Daily G C.Nature's Services:Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems.Washington,DC:Island Press,1997.
    [2]Costanza R,d'Arge R,De Groot R,Farber S,Grasso M,Hannon B,Limburg K,Naeem S,O'Neill R V,Paruelo J,Raskin R G,Sutton P,Van Den Belt M.The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital.Nature,1997,387(6630):253-260.
    [3]Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.Ecosystems and Human Well-being:Synthesis.Washington,DC:Island Press,2005.
    [4]Díaz S,Pascual U,Stenseke M,Martín-López B,Watson R T,Molnár Z,Hill R,Chan K M A,Baste I A,Brauman K A,Polasky S,Church A,Lonsdale M,Larigauderie A,Leadley P W,Van Oudenhoven A P E,Van Der Plaat F,Schr9ter M,Lavorel S,Aumeeruddy-Thomas Y,Bukvareva E,Davies K,Demissew S,Erpul G,Failler P,Guerra C A,Hewitt C L,Keune H,Lindley S,Shirayama Y.Assessing nature's contributions to people.Science,2018,359(6373):270-272.
    [5]李丽,王心源,骆磊,冀欣阳,赵燕,赵颜创,Bachagha N.生态系统服务价值评估方法综述.生态学杂志,2018,37(4):1233-1245.
    [6]张立伟,傅伯杰.生态系统服务制图研究进展.生态学报,2014,34(2):316-325.
    [7]李双成,张才玉,刘金龙,朱文博,马程,王珏.生态系统服务权衡与协同研究进展及地理学研究议题.地理研究,2013,32(8):1379-1390.
    [8]王鹏涛,张立伟,李英杰,焦磊,王浩,延军平,吕一河,傅伯杰.汉江上游生态系统服务权衡与协同关系时空特征.地理学报,2017,72(11):2064-2078.
    [9]马琳,刘浩,彭建,吴健生.生态系统服务供给和需求研究进展.地理学报,2017,72(7):1277-1289.
    [10]Li Y J,Zhang L W,Yan J P,Wang P T,Hu N K,Cheng W,Fu B J.Mapping the hotspots and coldspots of ecosystem services in conservation priority setting.Journal of Geographical Sciences,2017,27(6):681-696.
    [11]张立伟,傅伯杰,吕一河,董治宝,李英杰,曾源,吴炳方.基于综合指标法的中国生态系统服务保护有效性评价研究.地理学报,2016,71(5):768-780.
    [12]李双成.生态系统服务地理学.北京:科学出版社,2014.
    [13]赵文武,刘月,冯强,王亚萍,杨思琪.人地系统耦合框架下的生态系统服务.地理科学进展,2018,37(1):139-151.
    [14]吕一河,张立伟,王江磊.生态系统及其服务保护评估:指标与方法.应用生态学报,2013,24(5):1237-1243.
    [15]Maron M,Mitchell M G E,Runting R K,Rhodes J R,Mace G M,Keith D A,Watson J E M.Towards a Threat Assessment Framework for Ecosystem Services.Trends in Ecology&Evolution,2017,32(4):240-248.
    [16]Luck G W,Chan K M,Klien C J.Identifying spatial priorities for protecting ecosystem services.F1000Research,2012,1:17.
    [17]Nakaoka M,Sudo K,Namba M,Shibata H,Nakamura F,Ishikawa S,Makino M,Yamano H,Matsuzaki S I S,Yamakita T,Yu X B,Hou X Y,Li X W,Brodie J,Kanemoto K,Moran D,Verones F.TSUNAGARI:a new interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary study toward conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity and ecosystem services.Ecological Research,2018,33(1):35-49.
    [18]Cai W B,Gibbs D,Zhang L,Ferrier G,Cai Y L.Identifying hotspots and management of critical ecosystem services in rapidly urbanizing Yangtze River Delta Region,China.Journal of Environmental Management,2017,191:258-267.
    [19]Xiao Y,Xiao Q.Identifying key areas of ecosystem services potential to improve ecological management in Chongqing City,southwest China.Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2018,190(4):258.
    [20]LüY H,Zhang L W,Zeng Y,Fu B J,Whitham C,Liu S J,Wu B F.Representation of critical natural capital in China.Conservation Biology,2017,31(4):894-902.
    [21]Schr9ter M,Remme R P.Spatial prioritisation for conserving ecosystem services:comparing hotspots with heuristic optimisation.Landscape Ecology,2016,31(2):431-450.
    [22]Gos P,Lavorel S.Stakeholders'expectations on ecosystem services affect the assessment of ecosystem services hotspots and their congruence with biodiversity.International Journal of Biodiversity Science,Ecosystem Services&Management,2012,8(1/2):93-106.
    [23]SpanòM,Leronni V,Lafortezza R,Gentile F.Are ecosystem service hotspots located in protected areas?results from a study in Southern Italy.Environmental Science&Policy,2017,73:52-60.
    [24]Zhang L W,Fu B J,LüY H,Zeng Y.Balancing multiple ecosystem services in conservation priority setting.Landscape Ecology,2015,30(3):535-546.
    [25]刘焱序,徐光,姜洪源,胡晓旭,彭建,宋治清,王仰麟.东北林区生态系统服务与健康协同分析.地理科学进展,2015,34(6):761-771.
    [26]Xiao Y,Ouyang Z Y,Xu W H,Xiao Y,Zheng H,Xian C F.Optimizing hotspot areas for ecological planning and management based on biodiversity and ecosystem services.Chinese Geographical Science,2016,26(2):256-269.
    [27]Wu L,Liu X,Ma X Y.Impacts of grain for green project on spatiotemporal variations of soil erosion in a typical watershed of Chinese loess hilly and gully region.Fresenius Environmental Bulletin,2016,25(11):4506-4516.
    [28]Li Q R,Amjath-Babu T S,Zander P.Role of capitals and capabilities in ensuring economic resilience of land conservation efforts:a case study of the grain for green project in China's Loess Hills.Ecological Indicators,2016,71:636-644.
    [29]Zheng Z M,Fu B J,Feng X M.GIS-based analysis for hotspot identification of tradeoff between ecosystem services:a case study in Yanhe Basin,China.Chinese Geographical Science,2016,26(4):466-477.
    [30]Su C H,Fu B J,Wei Y P,LüY H,Liu G H,Wang D L,Mao K B,Feng X M.Ecosystem management based on ecosystem services and human activities:a case study in the Yanhe watershed.Sustainability Science,2012,7(1):17-32.
    [31]李晶,周自翔.延河流域景观格局与生态水文过程分析.地理学报,2014,69(7):933-944.
    [32]Zhang Y L,Qi W,Zhou C P,Ding M J,Liu L S,Gao J G,Bai W Q,Wang Z F,Zheng D.Spatial and temporal variability in the net primary production of alpine grassland on the Tibetan Plateau since 1982.Journal of Geographical Sciences,2014,24(2):269-287.
    [33]LI Y J,Zhang L W,Qiu J X,Yan J P,Wan L W,Wang P T,Hu N K,Cheng W,Fu B J.Spatially explicit quantification of the interactions among ecosystem services.Landscape Ecology,2017,32(6):1181-1199.
    [34]Fan M,Shibata H,Chen L.Spatial conservation of water yield and sediment retention hydrological ecosystem services across Teshio watershed,northernmost of Japan.Ecological Complexity,2018,33:1-10.
    [35]符素华,王向亮,王红叶,魏欣,袁爱萍.SCS-CN径流模型中CN值确定方法研究.干旱区地理,2012,35(3):415-421.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700