用户名: 密码: 验证码:
农田排水系统分布特征对水质净化效果的影响研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Types of Drainage Network Impact Attenuation of Dissolved Contaminants
  • 作者:孙少江 ; 罗纨 ; 邹家荣 ; 巫旺 ; 贾忠华 ; 张志秀 ; 朱卫彬
  • 英文作者:SUN Shaojiang;LUO Wan;ZOU Jiarong;WU Wang;JIA Zhonghua;ZHANG Zhixiu;ZHU Weibin;College of Water Resources and Hydro-power Engineering, Yangzhou University;Administrative Office of Yanyun Irrigation Area in Jiangdu District;River Management Office of Jiangdu District;
  • 关键词:农田排水 ; 沟塘系统 ; 水力联系 ; 水质净化 ; 去除率
  • 英文关键词:farmland drainage;;diches and ponds system;;hydraulic condition;;water quality improvement;;removal efficiency
  • 中文刊名:灌溉排水学报
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Irrigation and Drainage
  • 机构:扬州大学水利与能源动力工程学院;扬州市江都区昭关灌区管理处;扬州市江都区河道管理处;
  • 出版日期:2019-04-15
  • 出版单位:灌溉排水学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:04
  • 基金:江苏省水利科技项目(2017052,2018052)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:124-130
  • 页数:7
  • CN:41-1337/S
  • ISSN:1672-3317
  • 分类号:X52;S276
摘要
【目的】分析不同排水沟塘系统分布特点对农田排水污染物去除能力的影响。【方法】分别选择陕西省富平县卤泊滩和江苏省扬州市江都区为研究区,通过理论计算,比较了2种不同分布但农田面积比接近的排水沟塘系统的水质净化能力。【结果】①位于南方的江都研究区"小沟多塘"排水系统对于污染物的去除率比卤泊滩地区"大沟无塘"高出7%~36%;②在卤泊滩研究区,污染物降解的主要场所为排水农沟,而在江都研究区,则是面积较大的支沟和池塘;③2个研究区不同类型沟塘对污染物的去除效率都与其面积呈现良好的相关性。【结论】分布特征决定了沟塘水系的水力联系,"小沟多塘"类型分布的排水系统更有利于污染物的降解。
        【Objective】The overarching objective of this paper is to experimentally examine the impact of drainage network types on attenuation of agricultural pollutants.【Method】The comparative experiments were conducted at two sites: One was Lubotan at Fuping in Shaanxi province where the drainage system was ditches, and the other one was Jiangdu at Yangzhou in Jiangsu province where the drainage system was combination of ponds and a small number of small ditches. For each site, we analyzed the removal rate of agrochemical contaminants.【Result】The system at Jiangdu site was 7%~36% more efficient than that at Lubotan site in removing agrochemical pollutants. At Lubotan, the contaminants were mainly degraded in the ditches, while at Jiangdu, the contamination attenuation occurred in ponds and large ditches. On both sites, contamination attenuation was positively related to the areas of the ditch and the ponds.【Conclusion】Drainage network types control retention time of pollutants, and those with more ponds and a number of small ditches are more efficient in degrading pollutants.
引文
[1]刘馨井雨,王修贵,田英,等.基于湿地和生态沟处理的稻田排水水质模拟[J].灌溉排水学报,2018,37(2):101-107.
    [2]顾宏,孙勇,叶明林,等.南方灌区生态节水防污技术与应用:以高邮灌区为例[J].中国农村水利水电,2015(8):55-58.
    [3]JIA Z,LUO W,XIE J,et al.Salinity dynamics of wetland ditches receiving drainage from irrigated agricultural land in arid and semi-arid regions[J].Agricultural Water Management,2011,99(1):9-17.
    [4]KLEINMAN P J A,SMITH D R,BOLSTER C H,et al.Phosphorus fate,management,and modeling in artificially drained systems[J].Journal of Environmental Quality,2015,44(2):460-466.
    [5]宋常吉,李强坤,崔恩贵.农田排水沟渠调控农业非点源污染研究综述[J].水资源与水工程学报,2014,25(5):222-227.
    [6]李文斌,李新建,高学睿,等.桂林市堰塘湿地农田水环境修复技术研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2011,30(2):119-122.
    [7]KR?GER R,HOLLAND M M,MOORE M T,et al.Hydrological variability and agricultural drainage ditch inorganic nitrogen reduction capacity[J].Journal of Environmental Quality,2007,36(6):1 646-1 652.
    [8]KR?GER R,HOLLAND M M,MOORE M T,et al.Agricultural drainage ditches mitigate phosphorus loads as a function of hydrological variability[J].Journal of Environmental Quality,2008,37(1):107-113.
    [9]彭世彰,高焕芝,张正良.灌区沟塘湿地对稻田排水中氮磷的原位削减效果及机理研究[J].水利学报,2010,41(4):406-411.
    [10]彭世彰,熊玉江,罗玉峰,等.稻田与沟塘湿地协同原位削减排水中氮磷的效果[J].水利学报,2013,44(6):657-663.
    [11]夏霆,郭岩.自然沟塘系统对有机农业面源污染的削减效果研究[J].广东农业科学,2010,37(12):155-157.
    [12]高焕芝,彭世彰,孙勇,等.稻田排水在沟塘湿地净化中总氮浓度的周期性特征[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版),2010,38(2):220-224.
    [13]WU J X,CHENG X,XIAO H S,et al.Agricultural landscape change in China’s Yangtze Delta,1942-2002:A case study[J].Agriculture,Ecosystems&Environment,2009,129(4):523-533.
    [14]裴源生,李旭东,杨明智.21世纪以来我国灌溉面积构成及农业种植结构变化趋势[J].灌溉排水学报,2018,37(4):1-8.
    [15]MORENO-MATEOS D,MANDERü,COMíN F A,et al.Relationships between landscape pattern,wetland characteristics,and water quality in agricultural catchments[J].Journal of Environmental Quality,2008,37(6):2 170-2 180.
    [16]VERHOEVEN J T A,ARHEIMER B,YIN C,et al.Regional and global concerns over wetlands and water quality[J].Trends in ecology&evolution,2006,21(2):96-103.
    [17]MICKELSON S K,BAKER J L,AHMED S I.Vegetative filter strips for reducing atrazine and sediment runoff transport[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2003,58(6):359-367.
    [18]ASMUSSEN L E,WHITE A W,HAUSER E W,et al.Reduction of 2,4-D Load in Surface runoff down a grassed waterway[J].Journal of Environmental Quality,1977,6(2):159-162.
    [19]罗纨,朱金城,贾忠华,等.排水沟塘分布特性及与农田水力联系对水质净化能力的影响[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(10):161-167.
    [20]贾忠华,陈诚,罗纨,等.农业排水沟塘系统污染物去除监测区代表性分析[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(3):110-117.
    [21]潘延鑫,罗纨,贾忠华,等.农田排水沟水体与底泥中盐分迁移研究[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(5):182-185.
    [22]侯静文,崔远来,赵树君,等.生态沟对农业面源污染物的净化效果研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2014,33(3):7-11.
    [23]CAMPO-BESCóS M A,MU?OZ-CARPENA R,KIKER G A,et al.Watering or buffering?Runoff and sediment pollution control from furrow irrigated fields in arid environments[J].Agriculture,Ecosystems&Environment,2015,205(7):90-101.
    [24]VYMAZAL J,B?EZINOVáT.The use of constructed wetlands for removal of pesticides from agricultural runoff and drainage:a review[J].Environment International,2015,75:11-20.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700