摘要
伴随售后回租的试运行,版权作为售后回租物逐渐成为融资租赁领域的新宠。由于立法与实践的脱节,版权能否作为售后回租物一直备受争议。解决争议应立足于版权融资租赁的理论基础。在阐释版权融资性售后回租法律风险的基础上提出:政府应当建立信用担保机制,完善知识产权交易市场为版权融资性售后回租提供外部制度保障;立法者应将版权等无形资产纳入未来出台的《融资租赁法》中予以规范,为版权融资性售后回租提供内部法律供给。外部保障和内部供给相结合的制度设计,将推动我国知识产权融资业务在更加开放、包容、完善和全面的轨道上前进。
With the pilot operation of sale-leaseback, copyright is becoming a popular choice for sale-leaseback in the field of financing lease. However, due to the gap between legislation and practice, whether copyright can be used as a sale-leaseback is still disputed. Settlement of this dispute should go back to the theoretical basis of copyright financing lease and try to lay out its legal risks. On this basis, the government should establish the credit guaranty mechanism to ensure and improve the intellectual property transaction market; legislators should include intangible assets such as copyright in the future related law to provide legal basis. These two suggestions will promote Chinese intellectual property financing business to a more inclusive and comprehensive future.
引文
[1] 姜仲勤.融资租赁在中国:问题与解答[M].北京:当代中国出版社,2003.
[2] 江必新.融资租赁合同纠纷[M].北京:法律出版社,2014.
[3] 李光荣,王力.融资租赁蓝皮书:中国融资租赁业发展报告(2014~2015)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2015.
[4] 褚梦贵.资性售后回租风险及应对措施[J].中国市场,2015(12):31-36.
[5] 来小鹏.影响知识产权价值评估的法律因素[J].中国知产评估,2008(3):33-35.
[6] 苑泽明.知识产权融资的风险、估价与对策[M].大连:东北财经大学出版社,2012.
[7] 刘汉霞.我国知识产权融资租赁的现实困惑与法律规制[J].知识产权,2017(8):70-77.
[8] 范胜申.科技型中小企业基于知识产权的融资租赁模式研究[J].北方金融,2017(4):20-24.
[9] 金正宇.商标融资性售后回许可法律分析[J].社科纵横(新理论版),2012,27(1):83-84.
[10] 北京文科租赁开展2亿回租业务标的为24款游戏软件著作权[EB /0L].(2014-02-02)[2018-11-28].https://www.sohu.com/a/220585950_47331.
[11] 史燕平.融资租赁及其宏观经济效应[M].北京:对外经贸大学出版社,2004.
[12] 鲁耀斌,周涛.电子商务信任[M].武汉:华中科技大学出版社,2007.
[13] 吴汉东.知识产权法[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2012.
[14] 刘新智. 浅谈知识产权的融资租赁[J]. 吉林金融研究, 2002(7):24-26.
[15] 凌宗诠,王孝平,沈鹤良.金融租赁理论与实务[M].上海:立信会计出版社,1998.
[16] 全国注册知产评估师考试用书编写组.经济法[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社,2007.
[17] 徐瑄.知识产权的正当性:论知识产权法中的对价与衡平[J].中国社会科学,2003(4):144-154,207.
[18] 李鲁阳.融资租赁若干问题研究与借鉴[M].北京:当代中国出版社,2007.
[19] 刘春田.知识产权法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2014.