用户名: 密码: 验证码:
基于进化树模型的河南省城市紧凑度综合评价
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Research on the Characters of City Compactness Based on Evolutionary Tree Model in Henan Province
  • 作者:荣培君 ; 刘慧 ; 吕连琴 ; 秦耀辰
  • 英文作者:RONG Peijun;LIU Hui;LYU Lianqin;QIN Yaochen;Tourism and Exhibition College,Henan University of Economics and Law;Collaborative Innovation Center on Urban and Rural Harmonious Development of Henan Province,Henan University of Economics and Law;College of Environment and Planning,Henan University;
  • 关键词:进化树模型 ; 紧凑度 ; 城市形态 ; 河南省
  • 英文关键词:evolutionary tree model;;urban compactness;;urban form;;Henan Province
  • 中文刊名:地域研究与开发
  • 英文刊名:Areal Research and Development
  • 机构:河南财经政法大学旅游与会展学院;河南财经政法大学城乡协调发展河南省协同创新中心;河南大学环境与规划学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-06-10
  • 出版单位:地域研究与开发
  • 年:2019
  • 期:03
  • 基金:国家社会科学基金项目(17BJL065);; 河南省科技厅软科学项目(41901588);; 河南省教育厅人文社会科学项目(2019-ZZJH-093,2019-ZZJH-149)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:51-56
  • 页数:6
  • CN:41-1085/P
  • ISSN:1003-2363
  • 分类号:F299.27
摘要
城市紧凑度是区域可持续发展的重要衡量标准。运用熵权灰色关联方法及进化树模型对2006年和2016年河南省18个省辖市的城市紧凑度特征进行研究。结果表明:在紧凑度评价方面,城市紧凑度差异较大,河南省域整体城市紧凑度下降,城市呈蔓延状发展,但并不显著。在空间分异规律方面,省会郑州的核心带动能力逐渐增强,但未形成清晰的集聚格局;新乡、鹤壁、濮阳、商丘、周口和信阳的城市紧凑度亦有不同程度的提升,而安阳、南阳、驻马店、平顶山和三门峡呈现出扩散发展的态势。在关联特征方面,进化树模型和相关分析均显示城市空间发展形态的集聚扩散特征与城市综合发展水平之间没有必然联系。
        Urban compactness is an important measure of regional sustainable development. This study used the entropy weight gray correlation method and evolutionary tree model to study the compactness characteristics of 18 cities in Henan Province in the year of 2006 and 2016. The study reached the following conclusions:( 1) The overall urban compactness of Henan Province is decreased,the urban sprawl occurs in the cities,but it is not significant;( 2) In terms of spatial differentiation,there isn't obvious changes in Zhengzhou,Xuchang,Luoyang,Jiaozuo,Jiyuan,Kaifeng and Luohe,the urban agglomeration of Xinxiang,Hebi,Puyang,Shangqiu,Zhoukou and Xinyang has been enhanced,while the urban agglomeration of Anyang,Nanyang,Zhu Madian,Ping Dingshan and San Menxia has been expanding;( 3) In terms of correlation characteristics,cities with a high level of development may adopt the spreading development model,while cities with a low level of development may adopt the compact development model. There is no inevitable link between the urban compactness and the urban comprehensive development level.
引文
[1] ABDULLAHI S,PRADHAN B,MOJADDADI H. City Compactness:Assessing the Influence of the Growth of Residential Land Use[J]. Journal of Urban Technology,2018(3):1-26.
    [2]韩刚,袁家冬.东北三省城市紧凑度分布特征与空间关联分析[J].地域研究与开发,2017,36(2):24-28.
    [3] WANG P,ZHENG H,REN Z,et al. Effects of Urbanization,Soil Property and Vegetation Configuration on Soil Infiltration of Urban Forest in Changchun,Northeast China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science,2018,28(3):482-494.
    [4] BAIDYA R,DEBNATH B,DE D,et al. Sustainability of Modern Scientific Waste Compacting Stations in the City of Kolkata[J]. Procedia Environmental Sciences,2016,31:520-529.
    [5] GLASTER G,HANSON R,RATCLIFFE M,et al. Wrestling Sprawl to the Ground:Defining and Measuring An Allusive Concept[J]. Housing Policy Debate,2001,12(4):681-717.
    [6] BOUSSAUW K,ALLAERT G,WITLOX F. Colouring inside What Lines? Interference of the Urban Growth Boundary and the Political-administrative Border of Brussels[J]. European Planning Studies,2013,21(10):1509-1527.
    [7]吕斌,孙婷.低碳视角下城市空间形态紧凑度研究[J].地理研究,2013,32(6):1057-1067.
    [8]黄永斌,董锁成,白永平,等.中国地级以上城市紧凑度时空演变特征研究[J].地理科学,2014,34(5):531-538.
    [9]杨震,吕斌,王晶.北京、重庆和深圳城市空间增长绩效比较研究[J].地域研究与开发,2017,36(5):44-49.
    [10]吴志强.城市规划原理[M]. 4版.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
    [11] SHANAHAN D F,COX D T C,FULLER R A,et al. Variation in Experiences of Nature across Gradients of Tree Cover in Compact and Sprawling Cities[J]. Landscape&Urban Planning,2017,157(4):231-238.
    [12] CROMMELIN L,BUNKER R,TROY L,et al. As Compact City Planning Rolls on,A Look Back:Lessons from Sydney and Perth[J]. Australian Planner,2017,54(2):1-11.
    [13] BURKE M. Problems and Prospects for Public Transport Planning in Australian Cities[J]. Built Environment,2016,42(1):37-54.
    [14] WESTERINK J,HAASE D,BAUER A,et al. Dealing with Sustainability Trade-offs of the Compact City in Peri-Urban Planning across European City Regions[J].European Planning Studies,2013,21(4):473-497.
    [15] CHANDRASENA D C N,YUSOF K B W,LIYANAPATHIRANA V C,et al. Blocked Drains Syndrome:Physical Degradation of the Storm Drainage System in A Compact City[J]. Advanced Science Letters,2017,23(2):1407-1411.
    [16] HILLMAN M. Curbing Car Use:The Dangers of Exaggerating the Future Role of Public Transport[J]. Transportation Planning Systems,1994,2(4):21-30.
    [17] LEE S,AN Y,KIM K. Relationship between Transit Modal Split and Intra-city Trip Ratio by Car for Compact City Planning of Municipalities in the Seoul Metropolitan Area[J]. Cities,2017,70(6):11-21.
    [18] CHOBOKOANE N,HORN A. Urban Compaction and Densification in Bloemfontein,South Africa:Measuring the Current Urban Form against Mangaung Metropolitan Municipality’s Spatial Planning Proposals for Compaction[J]. Urban Forum,2015,26(1):77-93.
    [19] ANDERSON R,HOOPER M,TUVSHINBAT A. Towers on the Steppe:Compact City Plans and Local Perceptions of Urban Densification in Ulaanbaatar,Mongolia[J].Journal of Urbanism International Research on Placemaking&Urban Sustainability,2017,10(12):1-14.
    [20]程茂吉.紧凑城市理念在南京城市总体规划修编中的运用[J].城市规划,2012,36(2):43-50.
    [21]王珏,袁丰.基于演化树模型的长江三角洲城市紧凑度综合评价[J].长江流域资源与环境,2016,23(6):741-749.
    [22]潘竟虎,文岩.中国地级及以上城市紧凑度的综合测度及其空间关联分析[J].冰川冻土,2013,35(1):233-239.
    [23]韩刚,袁家冬,王兆博,等.哈大走廊城市规模、紧凑度与土地集约化的耦合[J].经济地理,2017,37(2):156-162.
    [24]于晓歆,李芹,阳春花.重庆市主城区城市空间扩展遥感监测研究[J].地理空间信息,2018(1):68-70.
    [25]周维,朱红梅,刘庆,等.湖南省城市紧凑度时空特征及影响因素研究[J].湖北农业科学,2018,57(11):25-28.
    [26]李健,夏帅伟.中国特大城市紧凑度测度及多重效应相关分析[J].城市发展研究,2016,23(11):109-116.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700