用户名: 密码: 验证码:
柴北缘马北地区下干柴沟组下段碎屑锆石U-Pb年代学分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:U-Pb geochronology analysis of detrital zircons in the Paleogene lower Xiaganchaigou formation in the northern Mahai area, northern margin of Qaidam Basin
  • 作者:王晔桐 ; 孙国强 ; 杨永恒 ; 王猛 ; 马富强 ; 张成娟 ; 赵健 ; 史基安
  • 英文作者:Wang Ye-tong;Sun Guo-qiang;Yang Yong-heng;Wang Meng;Ma Fu-qiang;Zhang Cheng-juan;Zhao Jian;Shi Ji-an;Northwest Institute of Eco-environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Science;University of Chinese Academy of Sciences;Research Institute of Exploration and Development,PetroChina Qinghai Oilfield Company;Drilling and Production Technology Research Institute,PetroChina Qinghai Oilfield Company;
  • 关键词:碎屑锆石 ; 沉积物源 ; 下干柴沟组下段 ; 马北地区 ; 柴达木盆地
  • 英文关键词:detrital zircon;;sedimentary source;;lower Xiaganchaigou formation;;northern Mahai area;;Qaidam Basin
  • 中文刊名:兰州大学学报(自然科学版)
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Lanzhou University(Natural Sciences)
  • 机构:中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院;中国科学院大学;中国石油青海油田公司勘探开发研究院;中国石油青海油田公司钻采工艺研究院;
  • 出版日期:2019-04-15
  • 出版单位:兰州大学学报(自然科学版)
  • 年:2019
  • 期:02
  • 基金:中国科学院“西部之光”人才培养计划(Y304RC1SGQ);; 甘肃省自然科学基金(1308RJZA310);; 甘肃省重点实验室专项(1309RTSA041)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:7-14+23
  • 页数:9
  • CN:62-1075/N
  • ISSN:0455-2059
  • 分类号:P597.3
摘要
通过对柴北缘马北地区古近系下干柴沟组下段(E31)岩芯的观测分析,挑选出3个样品,进行了碎屑锆石U-Pb年代学研究.发现碎屑锆石U-Pb年龄区间明显可以划分为早古生代和晚古生代-早中生代2个主年龄区间以及古、中、新元古代3个次级年龄区间.主年龄区间分别为380-480和200-320 Ma,峰值年龄分别为432和249 Ma;次级年龄区间分别为2000-2500、1400-1800、800-1000 Ma,峰值年龄不明显. 5个年龄区间分别代表了柴北缘造山带5次不同的构造事件:古元古代岩浆事件;中元古代非造山岩浆活动;新元古代Rodinia超大陆汇聚事件;古生代柴达木板块的俯冲-碰撞-折返过程;晚古生代-早中生代构造热事件.碎屑锆石年龄特征及对比结果证明了马北地区古近纪以来的沉积物源主要来自于嗷唠山和吐尔根达坂山,水动力条件稳定,沉积物源具有很好的继承性.
        Through an observation and analysis of the main drilling cores of the lower Xiaganchaigou formation(E_3~1) in the northern Mahai area, northern margin of Qaidam Basin, three samples were selected and their detrital zircon U-Pb chronology was studied. The results showed that the zircon U-Pb age spectra could be divided into two main age ranges of late Paleozoic-early Mesozoic and early Paleozoic, as well as three secondary ages of late Proterozoic, middle Proterozoic and early Proterozoic. The main age ranges were 200-320, 380-480 Ma, the peak age was 249 and 432 Ma respectively, the secondary age ranges were 800-1000, 1400-1800, 2000-2500 Ma, and the peak age was not obvious. Combined with the previous research results, our findings suggested that the five age ranges represented five different tectonic events of the northern part of Qaidam Basin marginal orogenic belt: Paleoproterozoic magmatic events, Mesoproterozoic non-orogenic magmatic activity, Neoproterozoic Rodinia Super Continental Convergence event, Paleozoic Qaidam block subduction-collision-exhumation process, and Late Paleozoic-early Mesozoic heat events. The age distribution of the clastic zircon also reflected that the source direction of the Paleogene sedimentary period in the northern area of Mahai mainly came from the Ao-Lao Mountain and Turgendaban Mountain and the hydrodynamic condition was stable and had good inheritance.
引文
[1]张妮.沉积盆地的物源综合研究:以苏北盆地高邮凹陷古近系戴南组为例[D].南京:南京大学, 2012.
    [2] Dickson W R, Gehrels G E. Use of U-Pb ages of detrital zircons to infer maximum depositional ages of strata:a test against a Colorado Plateau Mesozoic database[J].Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2009, 288(1/2):115-125.
    [3] Condie K C, Belousova E, Griffin W L, et al. Granitoid events in space and time:constraints from igneous and detrital zircon age spectra[J]. Gondwana Research, 2009,15(3/4):228-242.
    [4] Cawood P A, Hawkesworth C J, Dhuime B. Detrital zircon record and tectonic setting[J]. Geology, 2012, 40(10):875-878.
    [5] Nelson D R. An assessment of the determination of depositional ages for Precambrian clastic sedimentary rocks by U-Pb dating of detrital zircon[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 2001, 141/142(1):37-60.
    [6] Li Da-peng, Du Yang-song, Pang Zhen-shan, et al. Zircon U-Pb chronology and geochemistry of carboniferous volcanic rocks in Awulale Area, Western Tianshan Mountains[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2013, 34(2):176-192.
    [7] Fan Jan-jun, Li Cai, Wang Ming, et al. The analysis of depositional environment and U-Pb dating of detrital zircon for Zhanjin Formation at Gangma Co area, Southern Qiangtang, Tibetean Plateau[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2014, 88(10):1820-1831.
    [8] Li Xiao-bing, Pei Xian-zhi, Chen You-xin, et al. Metamorphosed polymictic conglomerate layer zircon U-Pb ageand its geological significance at Balong area in east part of Eastern Kunlun Mountains[J]. Geological Review,2014, 60(6):1212-1230.
    [9]裴磊,李瑞保,裴先治,等.东昆仑南缘哥日卓托地区马尔争组沉积物源分析:碎屑锆石U-Pb年代学证据[J].地质学报, 2017, 91(6):1326-1344.
    [10]闫臻,肖文交,刘传周,等.祁连山老君山砾岩的碎屑组成和源区大地构造背景[J].地质通报, 2006, 25(1):83-98.
    [11]张聪,刘晓瑜,杨经绥,等.柴北缘超高压变质带的新元古代变质作用:来自锡铁山副片麻岩的岩石学及独居石年代学证据[J].岩石学报, 2016, 32(12):3715-3728.
    [12]杨经绥,宋述光,许志琴,等.柴达木盆地北缘早古生代高压-超高压变质带中发现典型超高压矿物:柯石英[J].地质学报, 2001, 75(2):175-179.
    [13]王惠初,袁桂邦,辛后田,等.柴北缘绿梁山地区榴辉岩的产状及其成因意义初探[J].中国地质, 2001, 28(7):22-27, 8.
    [14]张建新,万渝生,孟繁聪,等.柴北缘夹榴辉岩的片麻岩(片岩)地球化学、Sm-Nd和U-Pb同位素研究:深俯冲的前寒武纪变质基底[J].岩石学报, 2003, 19(3):443-451.
    [15]杨经绥,张建新,孟繁聪,等.中国西部柴北缘-阿尔金的超高压变质榴辉岩及其原岩性质探讨[J].地学前缘, 2003, 10(3):291-314.
    [16]辛后田,王惠初,周世军.柴北缘的大地构造演化及其地质事件群[J].地质调查与研究, 2006, 29(4):311-320.
    [17]陈能松,王勤燕,陈强,等.柴达木和欧龙布鲁克陆块基底的组成和变质作用及中国中西部古大陆演化关系初探[J].地学前缘, 2007, 14(1):43-55.
    [18]陈能松,孙敏,王勤燕,等.东昆仑造山带中带的锆石U-Pb定年与构造演化启示[J].中国科学D辑:地球科学, 2008, 38(6):657-666.
    [19]孙国强,谢梅,张永庶,等.柴北缘马北地区下干柴沟组下段沉积特征及演化[J].岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(6):55-60.
    [20]孙国强,马进业,郭晖,等.地震属性在马仙地区下干柴沟组下段沉积环境分析中的应用[J].天然气地球科学, 2013, 24(6):1246-1252.
    [21]吴志雄,史基安,张永庶,等.柴达木盆地北缘马北地区古近系辫状河微相特征及沉积模式[J].天然气地球科学, 2012, 23(5):849-855.
    [22]杜忠明,史基安,孙国强,等.柴达木盆地马仙地区下干柴沟组上段辫状河三角洲沉积特征[J].天然气地球科学, 2013, 24(3):505-511.
    [23]邵威.柴达木马北地区古近系下干柴沟组下段地震沉积学研究[D].北京:中国地质大学, 2014.
    [24]陈吉,谢梅,史基安,等.柴北缘马北地区下干柴沟组储层特征[J].天然气地球科学, 2011, 22(5):821-826.
    [25]陈吉,张永梅,史基安,等.柴北缘冷湖-马仙地区古近系:新近系成岩作用特征[J].岩性油气藏学, 2012, 24(2):21-25.
    [26]孙国强,马进业,王海峰,等.柴达木盆地北缘马北地区碳酸盐胶结物特征及意义[J].石油实验地质, 2012,34(2):134-139.
    [27]贾艳艳,邢学军,陈吉,等.柴北缘南八仙油田古近系上部-新近系下部储层特征研究[J].石油天然气学报,2014, 36(8):18-26.
    [28]陈波,王波,管斌,等.柴北缘西段古近系优质储层孔隙成因类型及其控制因素[J].天然气地球科学, 2016,27(8):1454-1465.
    [29]佘刚,叶高鹏,卓红.柴达木盆地马海:大红沟地区基岩储层测井评价[J].天然气勘探与开发, 2016, 39(3):30-35.
    [30]王宏波.柴达木盆地北缘冲断带第三系沉积特征与岩性油气藏预测[D].成都:成都理工大学, 2013.
    [31]孙国强,司丹,王牧,等.柴达木盆地北缘地区构造运动过程及油气藏类型[J].天然气地球科学, 2012, 23(5):826-832.
    [32]王晓丰,翟肖峰.马海-大红沟凸起油气成藏主控因素研究[J].石油地质与工程, 2014, 28(4):11-14.
    [33]王亚东,张涛,迟云平,等.柴达木盆地西部地区新生代演化特征与青藏高原隆升[J].地学前缘, 2011, 18(3):141-150.
    [34]王亚东,郑建京,孙国强,等.柴西北地区碎屑锆石裂变径迹年龄记录的阿尔金山早新生代隆升事件[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2015, 45(5):1447-1459.
    [35]王金荣.柴达木盆地的形成与演化[J].兰州大学学报:自然科学版, 1988, 24(增刊1):66-71.
    [36]高先志,陈发景,马达德,等.中、新生代柴达木北缘的盆地类型与构造演化[J].西北地质, 2003, 36(4):16-24.
    [37]叶生霞,徐荣海,杜丁丁,等.柴达木盆地台深1井新近系储层孔隙结构特征[J].兰州大学学报:自然科学版,2017, 53(4):444-451.
    [38]王亚东,方小敏,张涛,等.平衡剖面反映的柴西新生代变形对青藏高原隆升的响应[J].兰州大学学报:自然科学版, 2009, 45(6):28-35.
    [39] Liu Yong-sheng, Hu Zhao-chu, Gao Shan, et al. In situ, analysis of major and trace elements of anhydrous minerals by la-icp-ms without applying an internal standard[J]. Chemical Geology, 2008, 257(1/2):34-43.
    [40] Chen Lu, Liu Yong-sheng, Hu Zhao-chun, et al. Accurate determinations of fifty-four major and trace elements in carbonate by LA-ICP-MS using normalization strategy of bulk components as 100%[J]. Chemical Geology, 2011, 284(3/4):283-295.
    [41] Andersen T. Correction of common lead in U-Pb analyses that do not report 204 pb[J]. Chemical Geology,2002,192(1/2):59-79.
    [42]吴元保,郑永飞.锆石成因矿物学研究及其对U-Pb年龄解释的制约[J].科学通报, 2004, 49(16):1589-1604.
    [43]刘永江, Neubauer F,李伟民,等.柴北缘-南祁连地区构造热事件[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2012,42(5):1317-1329.
    [44]王勤燕,陈能松,李晓彦,等.全吉地块基底达肯大坂岩群和热事件的LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb定年[J].科学通报, 2008, 53(14):1693-1701.
    [45]陆松年,王惠初,李怀坤,等.柴达木盆地北缘“达肯大坂群”的再厘定[J].地质通报, 2002, 21(1):19-23.
    [46]郝国杰,陆松年,辛后田,等.青海都兰地区前泥盆纪古陆块的物质组成和重大地质事件[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2004, 34(4):495-501.
    [47]肖庆辉,卢欣祥,王菲,等.柴达木北缘鹰峰环斑花岗岩的时代及地质意[J].中国科学D辑:地球科学,2003, 33(12):1193-1200.
    [48]陈能松,王勤燕,陈强,等.柴达木和欧龙布鲁克陆块基底的组成和变质作用及中国中西部古大陆演化关系初探[J].地学前缘, 2007, 14(1):43-55.
    [49]林慈銮,孙勇,陈丹玲,等.柴北缘鱼卡河花岗质片麻岩的地球化学特征和锆石LA-ICPMS定年[J].地球化学, 2006, 35(5):489-505.
    [50]张建新,杨经绥,许志琴,等.柴北缘榴辉岩的峰期和退变质年龄:来自U-Pb及Ar-Ar同位素测定的证据[J].地球化学, 2000, 29(3):217-222.
    [51]许志琴,杨经缓,吴才来,等.柴达木北缘超高压变质带形成与折返的时限及机制[J].地质学报, 2003, 77(2):163-176.
    [52]吴才来,郜源红,李兆丽,等.都兰花岗岩锆石SHRIMP定年及柴北缘超高压带花岗岩年代学格架[J].中国科学:地球科学, 2014, 44(10):2142-2165.
    [53]贾志磊,陈万峰,沙鑫,等.甘肃省南祁连化石沟地区发现中二叠世埃达克质岩:大地构造及成矿意义[J].大地构造与成矿学, 2017, 41(1):222-234.
    [54]胡万龙,贾志磊,王金荣,等.南祁连化石沟花岗岩年代学、地球化学特征及其构造意义[J].高校地质学报,2016, 22(2):242-253.
    [55]刘东晓,王玉玺,王金荣,等.塔里木板块东南缘早二叠世角闪石岩的发现及大地构造意义[J].兰州大学学报:自然科学版, 2016, 52(2):167-178.
    [56]吴才来,郜源红,吴锁平,等.柴北缘西段花岗岩锆石SHRIMP U-Pb定年及其岩石地球化学特征[J].中国科学D辑:地球科学, 2008, 38(8):930-949.
    [57]董增产,校培喜,辜平阳,等.青海冷湖盐场北山花岗闪长岩年代学、地球化学及其Hf同位素特征[J].西北地质, 2014, 47(4):141-155.
    [58]董增产,辜平阳,陈锐明,等.柴北缘西端盐场北山二长花岗岩年代学、地球化学及其Hf同位素特征[J].地球科学, 2015, 40(1):130-144.
    [59]董增产,杨成,辜平阳,等.青海冷湖盐场北山黑云母二长花岗岩年代学、地球化学及其地质意义[J].大地构造与成矿学, 2015, 39(1):167-178.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700