摘要
本文收集了2008—2018年3号井数字化水位观测对地震同震响应的数据资料,分析了井水位对7.8级以上大震的响应能力和同震变化特征。结果显示,3号井对远场大震响应能力较强;水位同震响应类型均表现为阶降;水位同震响应变化幅度与震中距和震级有明显的关联性;从同震响应方向来看,远场大震对本区域构造应力的影响以张应力为主。
This paper collected the data of the digital water level observation of the No. 3 well from 2008 to 2018 on the earthquake coseismic response, and analyzed the response capacity and coseismic variation characteristics of the well water level to large earthquakes above 7.8. The results show that No. 3 well has strong response to far-field large earthquakes; the water level coseismic response type shows a step-down; the magnitude of the water level coseismic response has obvious correlation with the epicenter distance and magnitude; from the perspective of coseismic response, the influence of far-field large earthquakes on tectonic stress in this region is dominated by tensile stress.
引文
[1]广东省地震局.广东省地震监测志[M].北京:地震出版社,2005.
[2]沈平,敬少群.湖南数字化井水位对尼泊尔M8.1级地震的同震响应特征分析[J].地球物理学进展,2017(5):1915-1920.
[3]周志华,黄辅琼,马玉川.中国大陆井水位观测网对甘肃岷县漳县6.6级地震同震响应特征分析[J].地震工程学报,2013(3):529-534.
[4]万永芳,李健梅.广东井水位和水温对汶川8.0级地震的同震响应研究[J].华南地震,2010(30):53-60.
[5]张清秀,陈小云,陈莹,等.福建省数字化水位水温资料的远场效应研究[J].华北地震科学,2007(4):49-54.
[6]付虹,邬成栋,刘强,等.印尼巨大地震引起的云南水位异常记录及其意义[J].地震地质,2007(4):873-882.
[7]中国地震局预测预报司.地震地下流体预报方法[M].北京:地震出版社,1997.