汶川震区震后地质灾害发育分布及演化特征统计分析

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Geological Hazards after Earthquake in Wenchuan Earthquake Area:Distribution and Evolvement Features 作者：高会会 ; 裴向军 ; 崔圣华 ; 朱凌 ; 梁玉飞 英文作者：GAO Hui-hui;PEI Xiang-jun;CUI Sheng-hua;ZHU Ling;LIANG Yu-fei;State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology;Research Institute of Spatial Ecological Restoration and Geological Disaster Prevention of Sichuan Province; 关键词：汶川地震 ; 滑坡 ; 泥石流 ; 演化规律 ; 差异性 ; 演化趋势 英文关键词：Wenchuan earthquake;;landslide;;debris flow;;evolution law;;difference;;evolutionary trend 中文刊名：长江科学院院报 英文刊名：Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute 机构：成都理工大学地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室;四川省国土空间生态修复与地质灾害防治研究院; 出版日期：2018-06-13 14:32 出版单位：长江科学院院报 年：2019 期：08 基金：国家重点研发计划资助项目(2018YFC1505205);; 国家创新研究群体科学基金项目(41521002);; 国家自然科学基金项目(41572302);; 四川省自然资源科技计划项目(KJ-2018-23) 语种：中文; 页：77-84 页数：8 CN：42-1171/TV ISSN：1001-5485 分类号：P694

摘要

汶川地震是21世纪以来中国发生震级最大的地震。为了分析汶川震区震后地质灾害发育分布,根据三大数据库及新闻稿的数据,以滑坡和泥石流为例,从规模、烈度及时间3个方面对汶川震后9 a来地质灾害演化特征及差异性进行了初步统计分析,并预测了2018—2025年滑坡和泥石流的演化趋势。结果表明:①滑坡数量与规模呈反比,与烈度也呈反比,且滑坡主要集中在7—9月份;②泥石流规模特征较均匀,高烈度区泥石流数量大于低烈度区,且主要集中在7—9月份;③滑坡在震后初期数量较少,泥石流则在震后初期数量较多;④初步分析汶川震后滑坡和泥石流演化特征差异的原因是这2种灾害的产生条件不同;⑤预测滑坡在短期内呈震荡式衰减趋势,高峰周期为3～5 a,泥石流呈水平波动趋势,高峰周期为3～5 a。
        Wenchuan earthquake is the largest earthquake in China since the 21 st century. From the aspects of scale, intensity and time,we made a preliminary statistical analysis on the characteristics and differences of geological disasters(landslide and debris flow in this paper) evolved nine years after the Wenchuan earthquake, and predicted the evolution trend of landslide and debris flow during 2018-2025. Results demonstrated that:(1) The number of landslide is inversely proportional to the scale and intensity of earthquake, and landslides mainly happened in July-September.(2)The scale of debris flow is more uniform, and the number of debris flow is approximately proportional to the intensity of earthquake, and debris flow mainly concentrated in July-September.(3) In the early stage after the earthquake, landslide was small in number while debris flow was large.(4) The difference in the evolvement characteristics between landslide and debris flow after the Wenchuan earthquake lies in the formation conditions.(5) According to prediction, landslide will decrease in an oscillating manner in a short period of time,with a cycle of 3-5 years, whereas debris flow will fluctuate horizontally,also with a cycle of 3-5 years.

引文

[1] 许强.汶川大地震诱发地质灾害主要类型与特征研究[J].地质灾害与环境保护,2009,20(2):86-93.
    [2] 周小军,崔鹏,葛永刚,等.崩滑体动力学机理分析及全过程速度计算:以四川省汉源县“8·6”大型崩塌滑坡为例[J].四川大学学报(工程科学版),2010,42(增刊1):125-131.
    [3] 殷志强,徐永强,赵无忌.四川都江堰三溪村“7·10”高位山体滑坡研究[J].工程地质学报,2014,22(2):309-318.
    [4] 许强,李为乐,董秀军,等.四川茂县叠溪镇新磨村滑坡特征与成因机制初步研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2017,36(11):2612-2628.
    [5] 刘秧,余斌,易伟,等.汶川地震后四川省安县黄洞子沟泥石流特征[J].长江流域资源与环境,2016,25(6):996-1001.
    [6] 李金洋.“5·12”震后北川干溪沟泥石流演化特征分析及危险性预测[D].成都:成都理工大学,2015.
    [7] 崔鹏,韦方强,陈晓清,等.汶川地震次生山地灾害及其减灾对策[J].中国科学院院刊,2008,33(4):317-323.
    [8] NAKAMURAH,TSUCHIYA S,INOUE K.Sabo Against Earthquakes[C]//Kokon Shoin,Tokyo,Japan,2000:190-220.
    [9] 蒋志林.基于RS的震区泥石流物源演化特征分析[D].成都:成都理工大学,2014.
    [10] 任非凡,谌文武,韩文峰.G212线陇南段泥石流发育成因及其时空分布特征分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2008,27(增刊1):3237-3243.
    [11] 殷跃平,潘桂棠,刘宇平,等.汶川地震地质与滑坡灾害概论[M].北京:地质出版社,2009:70-72.
    [12] 黄润秋.汶川地震地质灾害后效应分析[J].工程地质学报,2011,19(2):145-151.
    [13] 陈晓清,崔鹏,李泳,等.汶川地震后北川干溪沟山地灾害及长期发展趋势初步分析[J].四川大学学报(工程科学版),2010,42(增刊1):22-32.
    [14] 张丹丹.汶川地震高烈度区后续滑坡演化特征与控制因素研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2015.
    [15] 周荣军,黄润秋,雷建成,等.四川汶川8.0级地震地表破裂与震害特点[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2008,27(11):2173-2183.
    [16] 李秀珍,孔纪名,崔云,等.汶川地震滑坡与地震参数及地质地貌因素之间的相关关系[J].工程地质学报,2010,18(1):8-14.
    [17] 喻静.汶川地震诱发龙门山地质灾害分析[D].北京:中国地质大学,2013.
    [18] LIN C W,LIU S H,CHANG W S,et al.The Impact of the Chi-Chi Earthquake on the Subsequent Rainfall Induced Landslides in the EpicentralArea of Central Taiwan[C]//Proceeding of International Conference in Commemoration of 10th Anniversary of the Chi-Chi Earthquake.Taipei,September 17-21,2009:336-338.