养殖户畜禽废弃物资源化处理受偿意愿及影响因素研究
|
摘要
生态补偿是激励养殖户畜禽废弃物资源化处理,实现畜禽养殖经济与生态双收效益的有力政策途径。为深入了解养殖户畜禽废弃物资源化处理的补偿意愿及其意愿受偿水平,本研究基于山东省6市30县(区)的实地调研数据,利用整合性技术接受与使用(UTAUT)模型为理论分析框架,结合条件价值评估法(CVM)与Heckman两阶段选择模型进行了系统研究,结果表明:①72. 4%的养殖户愿意接受政府补偿进行畜禽废弃物的资源化处理,其意愿补偿水平为98. 02元/月·户;②婚姻状况、家庭年收入、养殖类型、养殖规模、经济绩效期望、社会绩效期望、知识储备、公共关系、技术便利性是影响养殖户补偿意愿的关键因素;③性别、年龄、家庭年收入、社会绩效期望、主观规范与公共关系显著影响养殖户的意愿补偿水平。基于此,为促进畜禽废弃物的资源化处理,保障养殖业健康发展,本研究提出以下政策建议:①加大对畜禽废弃物资源化处理的知识普及与技术宣传;②重视对畜禽废弃物资源化处理补偿政策的优化完善与推广落实;③强化对养殖户畜禽废弃物处理的政府管制与社会监督。
Ecological compensation is a powerful policy to encourage farmers to recycle livestock and poultry waste and achieve economic and ecological benefits. Based on field research data of 30 counties( districts) in 6 cities of Shandong Province,this paper systematically studies farmers' willingness to accept compensation for livestock and poultry waste resource utilization and its influential factors by using UTAUT theoretical analysis framework,CVM and Heckman two-stage selection model. The results show that: ①72. 4% farmers are willing to accept a certain amount of compensation as incentive to participate in livestock wastes utilization,the expected value of which is 98. 02 RMB per month per household. ② The key factors affecting farmer's willingness to accept the compensation include marital status,family annual income,concurrent business,farming scale,economic performance expectation,social performance expectation,knowledge reserve,public relations and technical convenience. ③ The impact factors of farmers 'willingness as to the amount of compensation include gender,age,family annual income,social performance expectations,subjective norms and public relations. Therefore,in order to promote recycling of livestock and poultry waste,this study proposes following policy recommendations: ①Promote knowledge education and technology popularization of livestock and poultry waste resource utilization. ②Perfect and implement subsidy policy for waste recycling. ③ Strengthen government control and social supervision for non-standard disposal of waste.
Ecological compensation is a powerful policy to encourage farmers to recycle livestock and poultry waste and achieve economic and ecological benefits. Based on field research data of 30 counties( districts) in 6 cities of Shandong Province,this paper systematically studies farmers' willingness to accept compensation for livestock and poultry waste resource utilization and its influential factors by using UTAUT theoretical analysis framework,CVM and Heckman two-stage selection model. The results show that: ①72. 4% farmers are willing to accept a certain amount of compensation as incentive to participate in livestock wastes utilization,the expected value of which is 98. 02 RMB per month per household. ② The key factors affecting farmer's willingness to accept the compensation include marital status,family annual income,concurrent business,farming scale,economic performance expectation,social performance expectation,knowledge reserve,public relations and technical convenience. ③ The impact factors of farmers 'willingness as to the amount of compensation include gender,age,family annual income,social performance expectations,subjective norms and public relations. Therefore,in order to promote recycling of livestock and poultry waste,this study proposes following policy recommendations: ①Promote knowledge education and technology popularization of livestock and poultry waste resource utilization. ②Perfect and implement subsidy policy for waste recycling. ③ Strengthen government control and social supervision for non-standard disposal of waste.
引文
[1]朱宁，马骥．我国畜禽养殖场废弃物来源、处理方式及处理难度评估---以蛋鸡养殖场为例[J]．中国畜牧杂志，2013,49(24):60-63．
[2]毛薇，吴画斌．规模化畜禽养殖废弃物循环利用模式及实施路径[J]．中国畜牧杂志，2016,52(6):71-74．
[3]宾幕容，文孔亮，周发明．湖区农户畜禽养殖废弃物资源化利用意愿和行为分析---以洞庭湖生态经济区为例[J]．经济地理，2017,37(9):185-191．
[4]宾幕容，周发明．畜禽养殖污染控制中的政府行为分析[J]．黑龙江畜牧兽医，2017(20):1-7．
[5]MUELLER W.The effectiveness of recycling policy options:waste diversion or just diversions?[J].Waste management,2013,33(3):508-518．
[6]KHANNA M,ISIK M,ZILBERMAN D.Cost-effectiveness of alternative green payment policies for conservation technology adoption with heterogeneous land quality[J].Agricultural economics,2015,27(2):157-174．
[7]梁丹，金书秦．农业生态补偿:理论、国际经验与中国实践[J]．南京工业大学学报(社会科学版)，2015(3):53-62．
[8]LANGPAP C.Conservation of endangered species:can incentives work for private landowners?[J].Ecological economics,2006,57(4):558-572．
[9]王志刚，黄圣男，钱成济．纯收入、保费补贴与逆向选择对农户参与作物保险决策的影响研究---基于黑龙江和辽宁两省的问卷调查[J]．中国软科学，2013(6):30-38．
[10]张郁，齐振宏，孟祥海，等．生态补偿政策情境下家庭资源禀赋对养猪户环境行为影响---基于湖北省248个专业养殖户(场)的调查研究[J]．农业经济问题，2015(6):82-91．
[11]NYONGESA J,BETT H,LAGAT J,et al.Estimating farmers’stated willingness to accept pay for ecosystem services:case of Lake Naivasha watershed payment for ecosystem services scheme-Kenya[J].Ecological processes,2016,5(1):15．
[12]熊凯，孔凡斌．农户生态补偿支付意愿与水平及其影响因素研究---基于鄱阳湖湿地202户农户调查数据[J]．江西社会科学，2014(6):85-90．
[13]熊凯，孔凡斌，陈胜东．鄱阳湖湿地农户生态补偿受偿意愿及其影响因素分析---基于CVM和排序Logistic模型的实证[J]．江西财经大学学报，2016(1):28-35．
[14]VAN H A,GOBIN A,VAN GOSSUM P,et al.Effort for money?farmers’rationale for participation in agri-environment measures with different implementation complexity[J].Journal of environmental management,2013,131:110-120．
[15]MORAN D,SHERRINGTON C.An economic assessment of windfarm power generation in Scotland including externalities[J].Energy policy,2007,35(5):2811-2825．
[16]何可，张俊飚．基于农户WTA的农业废弃物资源化补偿标准研究---以湖北省为例[J]．中国农村观察，2013(5):46-54．
[17]何可，张俊飚，田云．农业废弃物资源化生态补偿支付意愿的影响因素及其差异性分析---基于湖北省农户调查的实证研究[J]．资源科学，2013,35(3):627-637．
[18]施翠仙，郭先华，祖艳群，等．基于CVM意愿调查的洱海流域上游农业生态补偿研究[J]．农业环境科学学报，2014,33(4):730-736．
[19]陈艳萍，程亚雄．黄河流域上游企业参与生态补偿行为研究---以甘肃段为例[J]．软科学，2018(5):45-48．
[20]蔡银莺，张安录．基于农户受偿意愿的农田生态补偿额度测算---以武汉市的调查为实证[J]．自然资源学报，2011,26(2):177-189．
[21]余亮亮，蔡银莺．基于农户受偿意愿的农田生态补偿---以湖北省京山县为例[J]．应用生态学报，2015,26(1):215-223．
[22]韦惠兰，周夏伟．基于CVM视角的沙化土地封禁保护补偿标准研究[J]．干旱区资源与环境，2018(8):30-37．
[23]VENKATESH V,MORRIS M G,DAVIS G B,et al.User acceptance of information technology:toward a unified view[J].MIS quarterly,2003,27(3):425-478．
[24]ESCOBAR-RODRIGUEZ,TOMA C T,ELENA M L,et al.Factors that influence the perceived advantages and relevance of facebook as a learning tool:an extension of the UTAUT[J].Australasian journal of educational technology,2014,30(2):136-151．
[25]WONG K T,TEO T,RUSSO S.Interactive whiteboard acceptance:applicability of the UTAUT model to student teachers[J].Asiapacific education researcher,2013,22(1):1-10．
[26]何可，张俊飚，蒋磊．生物质资源减碳化利用需求及影响机理实证研究---基于SEM模型分析方法和TAM理论分析框架[J]．资源科学，2013,35(8):103-110．
[27]高杨，王小楠，西爱琴，等．农户有机农业采纳时机影响因素研究---以山东省325个菜农为例[J]．华中农业大学学报(社会科学版)，2016(1):56-63．
[28]王晓莉，徐娜，朱秋鹰，等．破窗效应之“破”---基于小农户生猪粪污治理技术使用态度的考察[J]．黑龙江畜牧兽医，2017(18):7-12．
[29]任立，甘臣林，吴萌，等．城市近郊区农户农地感知价值对其投入行为影响研究---以武汉、鄂州两地典型样本调查为例[J]．中国土地科学，2018,32(1):42-50．
[30]JANINE F D M,DUARTE RIBEIRO,JOSLUIS,et al.Influence of perceived value on purchasing decisions of green products in Brazil[J].Journal of cleaner production,2015,110:158-169．
[31]何可，张俊飚．农民对资源性农业废弃物循环利用的价值感知及其影响因素[J]．中国人口·资源与环境，2014,24(10):150-156．
[32]宾幕容，文孔亮，周发明．农户畜禽废弃物利用技术采纳意愿及其影响因素---基于湖南462个农户的调研[J]．湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版)，2017,18(4):37-43．
[33]DAVIS F D.Perceived usefulness,perceived ease of use,and user acceptance of information technology[J].MIS quarterly,1989,13(3):319-340．
[34]FERRARY M,GRANOVETTER M.The role of venture capital firms in Silicon Valley’s complex innovation network[J].Economy&society,2009,38(2):326-359．
[35]DEAN M,RAATS M M,SHEPHERD R.Moral concerns and consumer choice of fresh and processed organic foods[J].Journal of applied social psychology,2008,38(8):20．
[36]SPARKS P,GUTHRIE C A.Self-Identity and the theory of planned behavior:a useful addition or an unhelpful artifice?[J].Journal of applied social psychology,1998,28(15):18．
[37]吴丽丽，李谷成．农户劳动节约型技术采纳意愿及影响因素研究[J]．华中农业大学学报(社会科学版)，2016(2):15-22．
[38]李后建．农户对循环农业技术采纳意愿的影响因素实证分析[J]．中国农村观察，2012(2):28-36．
[39]李海燕，蔡银莺．主体功能区农田生态补偿的农户受偿意愿分析---以重点开发、农产品主产和生态功能区为实证[J]．农业现代化研究，2016,37(1):123-129．
[40]朱红根，黄贤金．环境教育对农户湿地生态补偿接受意愿的影响效应分析---来自鄱阳湖区的证据[J]．财贸研究，2018,29(10):40-48．
[41]皮泓漪，张萌雪，夏建新．基于农户受偿意愿的退耕还林生态补偿研究[J]．生态与农村环境学报，2018,34(10):903-909．
[42]张旋，全良．居民生态补偿意愿影响因素研究[J]．林业经济问题，2016,36(5):429-433．
[43]翁鸿涛，艾迪歌．基于CVM意愿调查的农业生态环境补偿研究---以甘肃静宁县为例[J]．兰州大学学报(社会科学版)，2017(6):139-146．
[44]黎洁，李树茁．基于态度和认知的西部水源地农村居民类型与生态补偿接受意愿---以西安市周至县为例[J]．资源科学，2010,32(8):1505-1512．
[45]文清，尹宁，吕明，等．云南森林生态功能区农户生态补偿支付意愿(WTP)影响因素及差异性分析[J]．长江流域资源与环境，2017,26(8):1260-1273．
[46]韦惠兰，祁应军．基于CVM的牧户对减畜政策的受偿意愿分析[J]．干旱区资源与环境，2017,31(3):45-50．
[47]刘雪林，甄霖．社区对生态系统服务的消费和受偿意愿研究---以泾河流域为例[J]．资源科学，2007,29(4):103-108．
[48]MITCHELL R C,CARSON R T.Using surveys to value public goods[M].Washington DC:RFF Press,1989．
[49]VAN D B B,BROUWER W,VAN E J,et al.Economic valuation of informal care[J].The European journal of health economics,2004,5(1):36-45．
[50]BATEMAN I J,WILLIS K G.Valuing environmental preferences theory and practice of the contingent valuation method in the US,EU,and developing countries[J].Resources policy,2004,27(1):57-59．
[51]HECKMAN J J.Sample selection bias as a specification error[J].Econometrica,1979,47(1):153-161．
[52]HE K,ZHANG J,ZENG Y,et al.Households’willingness to accept compensation for agricultural waste recycling:taking biogas production from livestock manure waste in Hubei,China as an example[J].Journal of cleaner production,2016,131:410-420．
[53]PUHANI P.The Heckman correction for sample selection and its critique[J].Journal of economic surveys,2000,14(1):16．
[54]LIU X,VEDLITZ A,SHI L.Examining the determinants of public environmental concern:evidence from national public surveys[J].Environmental science&policy,2014,39(5):77-94．
[55]全世文，刘媛媛．农业废弃物资源化利用:补偿方式会影响补偿标准吗?[J]．中国农村经济，2017(4):13-29.
[2]毛薇，吴画斌．规模化畜禽养殖废弃物循环利用模式及实施路径[J]．中国畜牧杂志，2016,52(6):71-74．
[3]宾幕容，文孔亮，周发明．湖区农户畜禽养殖废弃物资源化利用意愿和行为分析---以洞庭湖生态经济区为例[J]．经济地理，2017,37(9):185-191．
[4]宾幕容，周发明．畜禽养殖污染控制中的政府行为分析[J]．黑龙江畜牧兽医，2017(20):1-7．
[5]MUELLER W.The effectiveness of recycling policy options:waste diversion or just diversions?[J].Waste management,2013,33(3):508-518．
[6]KHANNA M,ISIK M,ZILBERMAN D.Cost-effectiveness of alternative green payment policies for conservation technology adoption with heterogeneous land quality[J].Agricultural economics,2015,27(2):157-174．
[7]梁丹，金书秦．农业生态补偿:理论、国际经验与中国实践[J]．南京工业大学学报(社会科学版)，2015(3):53-62．
[8]LANGPAP C.Conservation of endangered species:can incentives work for private landowners?[J].Ecological economics,2006,57(4):558-572．
[9]王志刚，黄圣男，钱成济．纯收入、保费补贴与逆向选择对农户参与作物保险决策的影响研究---基于黑龙江和辽宁两省的问卷调查[J]．中国软科学，2013(6):30-38．
[10]张郁，齐振宏，孟祥海，等．生态补偿政策情境下家庭资源禀赋对养猪户环境行为影响---基于湖北省248个专业养殖户(场)的调查研究[J]．农业经济问题，2015(6):82-91．
[11]NYONGESA J,BETT H,LAGAT J,et al.Estimating farmers’stated willingness to accept pay for ecosystem services:case of Lake Naivasha watershed payment for ecosystem services scheme-Kenya[J].Ecological processes,2016,5(1):15．
[12]熊凯，孔凡斌．农户生态补偿支付意愿与水平及其影响因素研究---基于鄱阳湖湿地202户农户调查数据[J]．江西社会科学，2014(6):85-90．
[13]熊凯，孔凡斌，陈胜东．鄱阳湖湿地农户生态补偿受偿意愿及其影响因素分析---基于CVM和排序Logistic模型的实证[J]．江西财经大学学报，2016(1):28-35．
[14]VAN H A,GOBIN A,VAN GOSSUM P,et al.Effort for money?farmers’rationale for participation in agri-environment measures with different implementation complexity[J].Journal of environmental management,2013,131:110-120．
[15]MORAN D,SHERRINGTON C.An economic assessment of windfarm power generation in Scotland including externalities[J].Energy policy,2007,35(5):2811-2825．
[16]何可，张俊飚．基于农户WTA的农业废弃物资源化补偿标准研究---以湖北省为例[J]．中国农村观察，2013(5):46-54．
[17]何可，张俊飚，田云．农业废弃物资源化生态补偿支付意愿的影响因素及其差异性分析---基于湖北省农户调查的实证研究[J]．资源科学，2013,35(3):627-637．
[18]施翠仙，郭先华，祖艳群，等．基于CVM意愿调查的洱海流域上游农业生态补偿研究[J]．农业环境科学学报，2014,33(4):730-736．
[19]陈艳萍，程亚雄．黄河流域上游企业参与生态补偿行为研究---以甘肃段为例[J]．软科学，2018(5):45-48．
[20]蔡银莺，张安录．基于农户受偿意愿的农田生态补偿额度测算---以武汉市的调查为实证[J]．自然资源学报，2011,26(2):177-189．
[21]余亮亮，蔡银莺．基于农户受偿意愿的农田生态补偿---以湖北省京山县为例[J]．应用生态学报，2015,26(1):215-223．
[22]韦惠兰，周夏伟．基于CVM视角的沙化土地封禁保护补偿标准研究[J]．干旱区资源与环境，2018(8):30-37．
[23]VENKATESH V,MORRIS M G,DAVIS G B,et al.User acceptance of information technology:toward a unified view[J].MIS quarterly,2003,27(3):425-478．
[24]ESCOBAR-RODRIGUEZ,TOMA C T,ELENA M L,et al.Factors that influence the perceived advantages and relevance of facebook as a learning tool:an extension of the UTAUT[J].Australasian journal of educational technology,2014,30(2):136-151．
[25]WONG K T,TEO T,RUSSO S.Interactive whiteboard acceptance:applicability of the UTAUT model to student teachers[J].Asiapacific education researcher,2013,22(1):1-10．
[26]何可，张俊飚，蒋磊．生物质资源减碳化利用需求及影响机理实证研究---基于SEM模型分析方法和TAM理论分析框架[J]．资源科学，2013,35(8):103-110．
[27]高杨，王小楠，西爱琴，等．农户有机农业采纳时机影响因素研究---以山东省325个菜农为例[J]．华中农业大学学报(社会科学版)，2016(1):56-63．
[28]王晓莉，徐娜，朱秋鹰，等．破窗效应之“破”---基于小农户生猪粪污治理技术使用态度的考察[J]．黑龙江畜牧兽医，2017(18):7-12．
[29]任立，甘臣林，吴萌，等．城市近郊区农户农地感知价值对其投入行为影响研究---以武汉、鄂州两地典型样本调查为例[J]．中国土地科学，2018,32(1):42-50．
[30]JANINE F D M,DUARTE RIBEIRO,JOSLUIS,et al.Influence of perceived value on purchasing decisions of green products in Brazil[J].Journal of cleaner production,2015,110:158-169．
[31]何可，张俊飚．农民对资源性农业废弃物循环利用的价值感知及其影响因素[J]．中国人口·资源与环境，2014,24(10):150-156．
[32]宾幕容，文孔亮，周发明．农户畜禽废弃物利用技术采纳意愿及其影响因素---基于湖南462个农户的调研[J]．湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版)，2017,18(4):37-43．
[33]DAVIS F D.Perceived usefulness,perceived ease of use,and user acceptance of information technology[J].MIS quarterly,1989,13(3):319-340．
[34]FERRARY M,GRANOVETTER M.The role of venture capital firms in Silicon Valley’s complex innovation network[J].Economy&society,2009,38(2):326-359．
[35]DEAN M,RAATS M M,SHEPHERD R.Moral concerns and consumer choice of fresh and processed organic foods[J].Journal of applied social psychology,2008,38(8):20．
[36]SPARKS P,GUTHRIE C A.Self-Identity and the theory of planned behavior:a useful addition or an unhelpful artifice?[J].Journal of applied social psychology,1998,28(15):18．
[37]吴丽丽，李谷成．农户劳动节约型技术采纳意愿及影响因素研究[J]．华中农业大学学报(社会科学版)，2016(2):15-22．
[38]李后建．农户对循环农业技术采纳意愿的影响因素实证分析[J]．中国农村观察，2012(2):28-36．
[39]李海燕，蔡银莺．主体功能区农田生态补偿的农户受偿意愿分析---以重点开发、农产品主产和生态功能区为实证[J]．农业现代化研究，2016,37(1):123-129．
[40]朱红根，黄贤金．环境教育对农户湿地生态补偿接受意愿的影响效应分析---来自鄱阳湖区的证据[J]．财贸研究，2018,29(10):40-48．
[41]皮泓漪，张萌雪，夏建新．基于农户受偿意愿的退耕还林生态补偿研究[J]．生态与农村环境学报，2018,34(10):903-909．
[42]张旋，全良．居民生态补偿意愿影响因素研究[J]．林业经济问题，2016,36(5):429-433．
[43]翁鸿涛，艾迪歌．基于CVM意愿调查的农业生态环境补偿研究---以甘肃静宁县为例[J]．兰州大学学报(社会科学版)，2017(6):139-146．
[44]黎洁，李树茁．基于态度和认知的西部水源地农村居民类型与生态补偿接受意愿---以西安市周至县为例[J]．资源科学，2010,32(8):1505-1512．
[45]文清，尹宁，吕明，等．云南森林生态功能区农户生态补偿支付意愿(WTP)影响因素及差异性分析[J]．长江流域资源与环境，2017,26(8):1260-1273．
[46]韦惠兰，祁应军．基于CVM的牧户对减畜政策的受偿意愿分析[J]．干旱区资源与环境，2017,31(3):45-50．
[47]刘雪林，甄霖．社区对生态系统服务的消费和受偿意愿研究---以泾河流域为例[J]．资源科学，2007,29(4):103-108．
[48]MITCHELL R C,CARSON R T.Using surveys to value public goods[M].Washington DC:RFF Press,1989．
[49]VAN D B B,BROUWER W,VAN E J,et al.Economic valuation of informal care[J].The European journal of health economics,2004,5(1):36-45．
[50]BATEMAN I J,WILLIS K G.Valuing environmental preferences theory and practice of the contingent valuation method in the US,EU,and developing countries[J].Resources policy,2004,27(1):57-59．
[51]HECKMAN J J.Sample selection bias as a specification error[J].Econometrica,1979,47(1):153-161．
[52]HE K,ZHANG J,ZENG Y,et al.Households’willingness to accept compensation for agricultural waste recycling:taking biogas production from livestock manure waste in Hubei,China as an example[J].Journal of cleaner production,2016,131:410-420．
[53]PUHANI P.The Heckman correction for sample selection and its critique[J].Journal of economic surveys,2000,14(1):16．
[54]LIU X,VEDLITZ A,SHI L.Examining the determinants of public environmental concern:evidence from national public surveys[J].Environmental science&policy,2014,39(5):77-94．
[55]全世文，刘媛媛．农业废弃物资源化利用:补偿方式会影响补偿标准吗?[J]．中国农村经济，2017(4):13-29.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |