太湖流域典型厂村融合区复合面源污染特征分析——以礼嘉镇、洛阳镇、雪堰镇为例

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Characteristics Analysis of Composite Non-point Source Pollution in Typical Industrial-agricultural-integrating Area in Taihu Lake Basin——A Case Study of Lijia Town,Luoyang Town and Xueyan Town 作者：陈亚军 ; 何席伟 ; 周嘉伟 ; 齐昭栋 ; 张徐祥 英文作者：CHEN Ya-jun;HE Xi-wei;ZHOU Jia-wei;QI Zhao-dong;ZHANG Xu-xiang;State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse,School of the Environment,Nanjing University;Jiangsu Environmental Protection Industry Co., Ltd.; 关键词：太湖流域 ; 厂村融合区 ; 复合面源污染 ; 等标污染负荷 英文关键词：Taihu Lake Basin;;Industrial-agricultural-integrating area;;Composite Non-point source pollution;;Equivalent pollution load 中文刊名：环境监控与预警 英文刊名：Environmental Monitoring and Forewarning 机构：污染控制与资源化国家重点实验室南京大学环境学院;江苏环保产业股份有限公司; 出版日期：2019-03-30 出版单位：环境监控与预警 年：2019 期：02 基金：国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项基金资助项目(2017ZX07202003) 语种：中文; 页：5-13 页数：9 CN：32-1805/X ISSN：1674-6732 分类号：X52

摘要

为把握厂村融合区工农业复合面源污染现状及特征,选取典型区域礼嘉、洛阳、雪堰3镇进行研究,结果表明,2017年3镇复合面源等标污染负荷总量为1. 85×10~9m~3/a,其中总氮(TN)等标负荷量最高,占总量的44. 73%,为优先控制因子; 57个行政村中,污染物负荷量及负荷强度均较高的行政村大多集中在洛阳镇和礼嘉镇,如圻庄村、天井村、毛家村、大路村等,为优先控制区域;各污染源中,农村生活污水和畜禽养殖贡献的等标污染负荷量最高,分别占总量的37. 88%和35.49%,其次是种植业和厂区面源,贡献率分别为13. 17%和12. 77%,水产养殖贡献率最低;通过聚类分析将厂村融合区复合面源污染类型分为6类。
        In order to grasp the present situation and characteristics of industrial and agricultural non-point source pollution in the fusion area of factories and villages,the typical areas of Lijia Town,Luoyang Town and Xueyan Town were selected to study. The results showed that the total pollution load of Lijia Town,Luoyang Town and Xueyan Town was 1. 85 × 109 m3/a in 2017,and TN was the highest,accounting for 44. 73% of the total,which was the priority control factor in 57 administrative villages. Most of the administrative villages with higher biomass load and load intensity are located in Luoyang and Lijia towns,such as Qizhuang,Tianjing,Maojia and Dalu villages,which are the priority control areas. Among the pollution sources,rural domestic sewage and livestock and poultry farming contribute the highest contamination load,accounting for 37. 88% and 35. 49% of the total,respectively. The contribution rates were 13. 17% and 12. 77% respectively,and the contribution rate of aquaculture was the lowest. By cluster analysis,the non-point source pollution types in the fusion area of factories and villages were divided into six categories.

引文

[1]王静,郭熙盛,吕国安,等.农业面源污染研究进展及其发展态势分析[J].江苏农业科学,2016,44(9):21-24.
    [2]CORWIN D L,VAUGHAN P J,LOAGUE K,et al.Monitoring nonpoint source pollutants in the vadose zone with GIS[J].Environmental Science and Technology,1997,31(8):2157-2175.
    [3]贺缠生,傅伯杰,陈利顶.非点源污染的管理及控制[J].环境科学,1998,19(5):87-91,96.
    [4]张红举,陈方.太湖流域面源污染现状及控制途径[J].水资源保护,2010,26(3):87-90.
    [5]张志彬,孟庆宇,马征.城市面源污染的污染特征研究[J].给水排水,2016,42(s1):163-167.
    [6]赵琰鑫,彭虹,王双玲,等.分布式工业区面源污染模型研究[J].武汉大学学报(工学版),2012,45(5):594-597.
    [7]江苏省环境科学研究院.太湖流域主要入湖河流水环境综合整治规划编制技术规范[EB/OL].(2008-11-20)[2018-12-01].http://hbt.jiangsu.gov.cn/art/2008/11/20/art_1615_4061779.html.
    [8]王业雷.南昌市城区降雨径流污染过程与防治措施研究[D].南昌:南昌大学,2008.
    [9]中国农业科学院农业环境与可持续发展研究所,第一次全国污染源普查畜禽养殖业源产排污系数手册[EB/OL].(2009-02)[2019-01-29].https://wenku.baidu.com/view/9f82b6740342a8956bec0975f46527d3250ca66c.html.
    [10]吴蓓,汪翙,黄玮,等.苏州城区不同功能区地表径流污染特征[J].水资源保护,2007,23(2):57-59.
    [11]田永静,李田,叶公建,等.苏州市工业用地地表径流污染特性研究[J].环境污染与防治,2009,31(6):39-42.
    [12]NOVOTNY V,CHESTERS G.面源污染管理与控制手册[M].广州:科学普及出版社,1987:123-140.
    [13]谢经朝,赵秀兰,何丙辉,等.汉丰湖流域农业面源污染氮磷排放特征分析[J/OL].环境科学.http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail.11.1895.X.20181115.1757.026.html,2018-11-15.
    [14]崔超,刘申,翟丽梅,等.兴山县香溪河流域农业源氮磷排放估算及时空特征分析[J].农业环境科学学报,2015,34(5):937-946.
    [15]邱斌,李萍萍,钟晨宇,等.海河流域农村非点源污染现状及空间特征分析[J].中国环境科学,2012,32(3):564-570.
    [16]王宁.农业非点源污染发生潜力指数模型及在宜兴市的应用研究[D].南京:南京大学,2011.
    [17]吴召仕,蔡永久,陈宇炜,等.太湖流域主要河流大型底栖动物群落结构及水质生物学评价[J].湖泊科学,2011,23(5):686-694.
    [18]於梦秋,蔡颖,刘华,等.太湖流域入湖河流土地利用类型对水质的影响---以乌溪港、武进港为例[J].农业环境科学学报,2014,33(5):1024-1032.