以公共价值为基础的水环境治理项目绩效评价——以云南省杞麓湖流域为例
|
摘要
通过对云南省杞麓湖流域的实地调研考察,基于以公共价值为基础的核心框架,构建实施过程子系统与环境结果子系统的水环境治理项目绩效评价体系,辅以层次分析法对云南省杞麓湖流域3个水环境治理项目绩效值进行评估。结果表明:(1)村落环境治理、农田废水循环以及河口湿地建设项目综合绩效分别为0.801 0,0.780 2,0.498 9,对应项目绩效评价分别为优秀、良好、一般。绩效评价结果与实际情况相一致,说明该绩效评价方法的可行性。(2)公平性与可持续性的缺失是造成3个水环境治理项目综合绩效显著差异的主要原因,而如何体现政策的民主价值、构建可持续运行管理监督体系是改善政策绩效的根本途径。以公共价值为基础框架的水环境治理项目绩效评价不仅涵盖了不同行为主体对不同利益与目标的追求,而且修正了单一环境结果绩效评价造成的误差,使绩效评价更加符合客观现实,并为水环境污染治理绩效评价提供了新视角、新尝试。
Through the field investigation of Qilu Lake Basin in Yunnan Province,a performance evaluation system of water environment control project,which contains implementation process and environmental results,was constructed based on the core framework of public value. The method of analytic hierarchy process(AHP) was used to analyze performance evaluations of three water environmental management projects. The results showed that:(1)The performance of the village environment comprehensive treatment project,farmland wastewater purification and recycling project,and wetland construction project are 0.801 0,0.780 2,and 0.498 9,respectively,and the corresponding evaluations of project performance are excellent,good,and general. These evaluations,which are consistent with the actual situation,prove the feasibility of the performance evaluation method.(2) The lack of fairness and sustainability in the three water environment management projects was the main reason for the significant difference in the comprehensive performance. How to embody the democratic value of policy and construct sustainable operation management supervision system are the fundamental ways to improve policy performance. Public value is the preference collection of residents themselves and their expectation for government. The performance evaluation of water environment governance projects based on the framework of public value,which not only contains the pursuit of various interests and goals of different actors,but also corrects the errors caused by single-result-oriented performance evaluation,makes the performance evaluation more in line with the reality. In addition,this article provides a new perspective and new attempt for the performance evaluation of water environment pollution control.
Through the field investigation of Qilu Lake Basin in Yunnan Province,a performance evaluation system of water environment control project,which contains implementation process and environmental results,was constructed based on the core framework of public value. The method of analytic hierarchy process(AHP) was used to analyze performance evaluations of three water environmental management projects. The results showed that:(1)The performance of the village environment comprehensive treatment project,farmland wastewater purification and recycling project,and wetland construction project are 0.801 0,0.780 2,and 0.498 9,respectively,and the corresponding evaluations of project performance are excellent,good,and general. These evaluations,which are consistent with the actual situation,prove the feasibility of the performance evaluation method.(2) The lack of fairness and sustainability in the three water environment management projects was the main reason for the significant difference in the comprehensive performance. How to embody the democratic value of policy and construct sustainable operation management supervision system are the fundamental ways to improve policy performance. Public value is the preference collection of residents themselves and their expectation for government. The performance evaluation of water environment governance projects based on the framework of public value,which not only contains the pursuit of various interests and goals of different actors,but also corrects the errors caused by single-result-oriented performance evaluation,makes the performance evaluation more in line with the reality. In addition,this article provides a new perspective and new attempt for the performance evaluation of water environment pollution control.
引文
[1]吴丹,王士东,马超.流域地方政府水环境保护绩效考评体系设计及其应用[J].水资源保护,2014,30(6):80-86.
[2]赵其国,黄国勤,马艳芹.中国生态环境状况与生态文明建设[J].生态学报,2016,36(19):6328-6335.
[3]张晓.中国水污染趋势与治理制度[J].中国软科学,2014(10):11-24.
[4]艾恒雨,刘同威.2000-2011年国内重大突发性水污染事件统计分析[J].安全与环境学报,2013,13(4):288-292.
[5]徐小钰,朱记伟,李占斌,等.国内外突发性水污染事件研究综述[J].中国农村水利水电,2015(6):1-5.
[6]许刚.太湖流域社会经济发展对水环境的影响研究——以无锡市为例[J].地域研究与开发,2002,21(1):55-59.
[7]王金南,王东,李云生,等.国家“十一五”重点流域水污染防治框架与思路[J].中国水利,2007(22):27-30.
[8]王啸宇,崔杨,陈玫君.中国水污染现状及防治措施[J].甘肃科技,2013,29(13):34-35.
[9]中国环境报.水污染防治行动计划[J].中国环保产业,2015(5):26-37.
[10]董瑛.“获得感”:习近平正风反腐的新理念新实践[J].中共浙江省委党校学报,2017(1):81-87.
[11]郇庆治.社会主义生态文明观与“绿水青山就是金山银山”[J].学习论坛,2016,32(5):42-45.
[12]JASCH C.Environmental Performance Evaluation and Indicators[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2000,8(1):79-88.
[13]KOLK A,MAUSER A.The Evolution of Environmental Management:From Stage Models to Performance Evaluation[J].Business Strategy&the Environment,2002,11(1):14-31.
[14]OECD.In Search of Results:Performance Management Practices[M].Paris:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development,1997.
[15]王亚华,吴丹.淮河流域水环境管理绩效动态评价[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2012,22(12):32-38.
[16]李雪松,孙博文.基于层次分析的城市水环境治理综合效益评价——以武汉市为例[J].地域研究与开发,2013,32(4):171-176.
[17]马涛,翁晨艳.城市水环境治理绩效评估的实证研究[J].生态经济,2011(6):24-26.
[18]周亮,徐建刚.大尺度流域水污染防治能力综合评估及动力因子分析——以淮河流域为例[J].地理研究,2013,32(10):1792-1801.
[19]MOORE M H.Creating Public Value:Strategic Management in Government[M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1995.
[20]MEYER R.The Public Values Failures of Climate Science in the US[J].Minerva A Review of Science Learning&Policy,2011,49(1):47-70.
[21]MARIE T T.Public Values as Essential Criteria for Public Entrepreneurship:Water Management in France[J].Utilities Policy,2016,40:162-169.
[22]DEMSKI C,BUTLER C,PARKHILL K A,et al.Public Values for Energy System Change[J].Global Environmental Change,2015,34:59-69.
[23]STOKER G.Public Value Management:A New Narrative for Networked Governance?[J].The American Review of Public Administration,2006,36(1):41-57.
[24]马亭亭,唐兴霖.公共价值管理:西方公共行政学理论的新发展[J].行政论坛,2014(6):100-106.
[25]何艳玲.“公共价值管理”:一个新的公共行政学范式[J].政治学研究,2009(6):62-68.
[26]包国宪,王学军.以公共价值为基础的政府绩效治理——源起、架构与研究问题[J].公共管理学报,2012,9(2):89-97.
[27]KELLY G,MUERS S,MULGAN G.Creating Public Value:An Analytical Framework for Public Service Reform[M].London:Cabinet Office,UK Governemnt,2002.
[28]路慧玲,周立华,陈勇,等.基于农户视角的盐池县退牧还草政策可持续性分析[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(4):1065-1071.
[29]张平,李秀芬,鲍洪杰.少数民族生态移民绩效分析——以疏勒河项目区为例[J].地域研究与开发,2011,30(6):42-47.
[30]樊胜岳.基于公共价值的生态建设政策绩效评价研究[J].行政论坛,2013(4):110-116.
[31]樊胜岳,陈玉玲,徐均.基于公共价值的生态建设政策绩效评价及比较[J].公共管理学报,2013,10(2):110-116.
[32]樊胜岳,杨建东,陈玉玲.生态治理项目的交易成本及其绩效评价[J].电子科技大学学报(社会科学版),2014,16(6):8-15.
[33]胡振通,柳荻,靳乐山.草原生态补偿:生态绩效、收入影响和政策满意度[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(1):165-176.
[34]聂莹,樊胜岳.西部民族地区生态治理政策公共价值分析与绩效评价——以内蒙古翁牛特旗为例[J].中央民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017(6):110-119.
[35]徐建华.计量地理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006.
[2]赵其国,黄国勤,马艳芹.中国生态环境状况与生态文明建设[J].生态学报,2016,36(19):6328-6335.
[3]张晓.中国水污染趋势与治理制度[J].中国软科学,2014(10):11-24.
[4]艾恒雨,刘同威.2000-2011年国内重大突发性水污染事件统计分析[J].安全与环境学报,2013,13(4):288-292.
[5]徐小钰,朱记伟,李占斌,等.国内外突发性水污染事件研究综述[J].中国农村水利水电,2015(6):1-5.
[6]许刚.太湖流域社会经济发展对水环境的影响研究——以无锡市为例[J].地域研究与开发,2002,21(1):55-59.
[7]王金南,王东,李云生,等.国家“十一五”重点流域水污染防治框架与思路[J].中国水利,2007(22):27-30.
[8]王啸宇,崔杨,陈玫君.中国水污染现状及防治措施[J].甘肃科技,2013,29(13):34-35.
[9]中国环境报.水污染防治行动计划[J].中国环保产业,2015(5):26-37.
[10]董瑛.“获得感”:习近平正风反腐的新理念新实践[J].中共浙江省委党校学报,2017(1):81-87.
[11]郇庆治.社会主义生态文明观与“绿水青山就是金山银山”[J].学习论坛,2016,32(5):42-45.
[12]JASCH C.Environmental Performance Evaluation and Indicators[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2000,8(1):79-88.
[13]KOLK A,MAUSER A.The Evolution of Environmental Management:From Stage Models to Performance Evaluation[J].Business Strategy&the Environment,2002,11(1):14-31.
[14]OECD.In Search of Results:Performance Management Practices[M].Paris:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development,1997.
[15]王亚华,吴丹.淮河流域水环境管理绩效动态评价[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2012,22(12):32-38.
[16]李雪松,孙博文.基于层次分析的城市水环境治理综合效益评价——以武汉市为例[J].地域研究与开发,2013,32(4):171-176.
[17]马涛,翁晨艳.城市水环境治理绩效评估的实证研究[J].生态经济,2011(6):24-26.
[18]周亮,徐建刚.大尺度流域水污染防治能力综合评估及动力因子分析——以淮河流域为例[J].地理研究,2013,32(10):1792-1801.
[19]MOORE M H.Creating Public Value:Strategic Management in Government[M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1995.
[20]MEYER R.The Public Values Failures of Climate Science in the US[J].Minerva A Review of Science Learning&Policy,2011,49(1):47-70.
[21]MARIE T T.Public Values as Essential Criteria for Public Entrepreneurship:Water Management in France[J].Utilities Policy,2016,40:162-169.
[22]DEMSKI C,BUTLER C,PARKHILL K A,et al.Public Values for Energy System Change[J].Global Environmental Change,2015,34:59-69.
[23]STOKER G.Public Value Management:A New Narrative for Networked Governance?[J].The American Review of Public Administration,2006,36(1):41-57.
[24]马亭亭,唐兴霖.公共价值管理:西方公共行政学理论的新发展[J].行政论坛,2014(6):100-106.
[25]何艳玲.“公共价值管理”:一个新的公共行政学范式[J].政治学研究,2009(6):62-68.
[26]包国宪,王学军.以公共价值为基础的政府绩效治理——源起、架构与研究问题[J].公共管理学报,2012,9(2):89-97.
[27]KELLY G,MUERS S,MULGAN G.Creating Public Value:An Analytical Framework for Public Service Reform[M].London:Cabinet Office,UK Governemnt,2002.
[28]路慧玲,周立华,陈勇,等.基于农户视角的盐池县退牧还草政策可持续性分析[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(4):1065-1071.
[29]张平,李秀芬,鲍洪杰.少数民族生态移民绩效分析——以疏勒河项目区为例[J].地域研究与开发,2011,30(6):42-47.
[30]樊胜岳.基于公共价值的生态建设政策绩效评价研究[J].行政论坛,2013(4):110-116.
[31]樊胜岳,陈玉玲,徐均.基于公共价值的生态建设政策绩效评价及比较[J].公共管理学报,2013,10(2):110-116.
[32]樊胜岳,杨建东,陈玉玲.生态治理项目的交易成本及其绩效评价[J].电子科技大学学报(社会科学版),2014,16(6):8-15.
[33]胡振通,柳荻,靳乐山.草原生态补偿:生态绩效、收入影响和政策满意度[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(1):165-176.
[34]聂莹,樊胜岳.西部民族地区生态治理政策公共价值分析与绩效评价——以内蒙古翁牛特旗为例[J].中央民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017(6):110-119.
[35]徐建华.计量地理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |