庐江废弃明矾石矿土壤重金属形态特征及生态危害评价

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Morphological characteristics and ecological risk assessment of soil heavy metals in Lujiang alumite mine 作者：左丹丹 ; 黄金文 ; 闻高志 ; 岳梅 ; 刘盛萍 英文作者：ZUO Dandan;HUANG Jinwen;YUE Mei;LIU Shengping;Department of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University;Collaborative Innovation Center for Environmental Pollution Precaution and Ecological Rehabilitation of Anhui; 关键词：明矾石矿 ; 土壤 ; 重金属形态 ; 潜在生态危害指数法 英文关键词：alunite mine;;soil;;heavy metal speciation;;potential ecological risk index method 中文刊名：生态科学 英文刊名：Ecological Science 机构：合肥学院生物与环境工程系;安徽省环境污染防治与生态修复协同创新中心; 出版日期：2019-09-15 出版单位：生态科学 年：2019 期：05 基金：合肥学院国家自然基金后续研究项目(1800070928) 语种：中文; 页：89-94 页数：6 CN：44-1215/Q ISSN：1008-8873 分类号：X53;X826

摘要

对庐江明矾石矿区选择排土场废石和冶炼废渣堆废渣中重金属(Cu、Zn、As、Cd)总量和形态分布进行探究,并用Hakanson潜在生态危害指数法评价其对环境的影响。结果表明,冶炼废渣堆土壤中的各重金属总量均高于排土场,并且As的含量是国家二级标准值的5.8倍;基于总量的Hakanson潜在生态风险评价结果表明,废石废渣重金属的潜在生态危害指数(RI)分别为1579.05和2022.25,均属于很强生态危害程度,另外, Cd对RI的贡献率均最大,分别占总量的97%和84%,其次为As。排土场和冶炼废渣堆土壤重金属的形态分布特征既有相似性又有差异性。各重金属均以残余态为主,含量在50%以上;废石中Cu的可交换态和碳酸盐结合态的比例占整体的11.11%,对矿区危害性较高,其余重金属对矿区存在低风险性危害。
        The contents and distribution of heavy metals(Cu, Zn, As, Cd) in the waste rock of waste soil and smelting waste residue in Lujiang alunite mining area were studied. The Hakanson potential ecological hazard index method was used to evaluate the environmental impact. The results showed that the total amount of heavy metals in smelting slag heap was higher than that in refuse dump, and the content of As was the national secondary standard value of 5.8 times. The Hakanson potential ecological risk assessment results showed that the potential ecological hazard index(RI) of heavy metals in waste rock and the smelting slag was 1579.05 and 2022.25 respectively, belonging to the strong ecological hazard degree. In addition, the contribution rate of Cd to RI was the highest, accounting for 97% and 84% of the total, and it was followed by As. The distribution characteristics of heavy metals in soils of refuse dump and smelting slag heap were similar and different.The heavy metals mainly existed with residual form, content in more than 50%, and the proportion of Cu exchangeable and carbonate-bound in the waste rock accounted for 11.11% of the whole, which was highly harmful to the mining area. The rest of heavy metals had low risk.

引文

[1]胡瑞霞,高柏,孙占学,等.某铀矿石尾矿坝下游土壤重金属形态分析[J].金属矿山,2009,39(2):160-162.
    [2]刘俊华,王文华,彭安.土壤中汞生物有效性的研究[J].农业环境保护,2000,19(4):216-220.
    [3]范裕,周涛发,袁峰等.庐枞盆地高硫化型浅层低温热液成矿系统：来自矾山明矾石矿床地质特征和硫同位素地球化学的证据[J].岩石学报,2010,26(12):3657-3666.
    [4]宣之强.中国明矾石资源及其应用[J].化工矿产地质,1998(4):279-286.
    [5]张寿稳.安徽庐枞地区高岭土资源及其开发利用[J].地质与勘探,2000(5):49-51.
    [6]韩效钊,许民才.明矾石综合利用现状及新工艺探讨[J].安徽科技,1995(7):3-4.
    [7]TESSIER A,CAMPBELL P G C,BISSON M.Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of trace metals[J].Analytical Chemistry,1979,51:844-851.
    [8]鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2000.
    [9]许桂苹,王晓飞,付洁.土壤重金属污染评价方法研究综述[J].农村经济与科技,2014,25(1):71-74.
    [10]范拴喜,甘卓亭,李美娟,等.土壤重金属污染评价方法进展[J].中国农学通报,2010,26(17):310-315.
    [11]郑洪萍.福建省耕地土壤重金属污染及生态风险评价[J].福建农业学报,2012,27(8):888-894.
    [12]王贵,张丽洁.海湾河口沉积物重金属分布特征及形态研究[J].海洋地质动态,2002,18(12):1-5.
    [13]徐争启,倪师军,庹先国,等.潜在生态危害指数法评价中重金属毒性系数计算[J].环境科学与技术,2008,31(2):112-115.
    [14]中国环境监测总站.中国土壤元素背景值[M].北京:中国科学出版社,1990:298-300.
    [15]李艺.广西德保铜锡矿床氧化带产出的砷酸盐矿物[J].广西地质,2001,14(1):61-64.
    [16]魏梁鸿,周文琴.砷矿资源开发与环境治理[J].国土资源导刊,1992,11(3):259-262.
    [17]谷金锋.大兴安岭典型采矿迹地土壤重金属污染分析与生态恢复研究[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2014:62-68.
    [18]黄科瑞,刘芳,张金磊,等.百色不同功能区土壤重金属形态分布及其生态风险评价[J].广东农业科学,2013,40(11):165-168.
    [19]王亚平,鲍征宇,侯书恩.尾矿库周围土壤中重金属存在形态特征研究[J].岩矿测试,2000,19(1):7-13.
    [20]钱进,王子健,单孝全.土壤中微量金属元素的植物可给性研究进展[J].环境科学,1995,16(6):73-75.
    [21]黄涓,刘昭兵,谢运河,等.土壤中Cd形态及生物有效性研究进展[J].湖南农业科学,2013(17):56-61.
    [22]徐争启,滕彦国,庹先国.氧化物型矿山重金属环境地球化学研究——以攀枝花钒钛磁铁矿为例[M].北京:科学技术出版社,2013.