污染型制造业空间格局演变的特征及影响因素分析——以长江经济带中下游地区为例

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Characteristics and influencing factors of spatial evolution of polluting manufacturing——A case study of the Middle and Lower Yangtze River Economic Belt 作者：刘燕 ; 赵海霞 英文作者：LIU Yan;ZHAO Haixia;State Key Laboratory of Lake Science and Environment, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences;University of Chinese Academy of Sciences; 关键词：污染型制造业 ; 空间格局演变 ; 影响因素 ; 长江经济带 英文关键词：pollution-intensive manufacturing;;evolution of spatial pattern;;influencing factors;;the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River economic belt 中文刊名：世界地理研究 英文刊名：World Regional Studies 机构：中国科学院流域地理学重点实验室中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所;中国科学院大学; 出版日期：2019-08-15 出版单位：世界地理研究 年：2019 期：04 基金：国家自然科学基金项目“制造业转移的污染排放格局响应机理与调控—以泛长三角地区为例”（71573250） 语种：中文; 页：98-106 页数：9 CN：31-1626/P ISSN：1004-9479 分类号：F427;X322

摘要

长江经济带是我国经济发展的关键地区,污染型制造业在长江中下游经济发展中占有重要地位。选取83个直辖市、地级市、州为研究对象,对2005-2015年污染型制造业格局的时空动态特征及其影响因素进行分析,得出如下结论:①时序变化特点表现为污染型制造业在下游地区呈衰减趋势的同时,中游却呈现大幅增长趋势;空间格局总体呈现出由沪宁杭沿长江向安徽皖江城市带、九江、荆州、长沙等中游地区扩散的态势;②环境规制、产业结构升级是长江经济带中下游地区污染型制造业空间格局演变的主要驱动力。经济发展和政府调控对污染型制造业空间集聚具有重要拉动作用。要素成本、基础设施、市场因素等传统产业区位因素呈负相关关系;③分地区看,经济发展水平、政府调控和创新能力是中游地区污染型制造业集聚的主要拉力,环境规制、产业结构升级、经济发展、政府调控和创新能力对下游地区污染型制造业的衰减具有明显推动作用,特别是长三角区域经济一体化以及环境规制的倒逼作用具有重要的牵引作用。
        Pollution-intensive manufacturing industries play an important role in the economic development of the Middle and Lower Yangtze River economic belt. This paper selected 83 prefecture-level cities in the Middle and Lower Yangtze River economic belt as the units, analyzed the spatio-temporal characteristics and influencing factors of the polluting manufacturing industries from 2005 to 2015, conclusions are as follows:①The pollution-intensive manufacturing industries had been declining in the downstream area, while increasing in the middle reaches. As for the spatial pattern, the pollution-intensive industries had spread from Shanghai, Nanjing and Hangzhou to the middle reaches of Anhui, Jiujiang, Jingzhou and Changsha.②Environmental regulation and upgrading of industrial structure are the main driving forces for the evolution of the spatial pattern of polluting manufacturing in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Economic development and government regulation have important effects on promoting the spatial agglomeration of pollution-intensive manufacturing. There are negative correlations between traditional industry location factors such as factor cost, infrastructure and market factors. ③ Level of economic development, government regulation, and innovation capability are the main pulling forces for the agglomeration of the pollution-intensive manufacturing in the middle reaches of the region. Environmental regulations, industrial structure upgrading, economic development, government regulation and innovation capabilities have an obvious effect on the attenuation of the pollution-intensive manufacturing in the lower reaches, especially the regional economic integration of the Yangtze River Delta and the forced effect of environmental regulation.

引文

[1] Baumol W J, Wallace E O. The theory of environmental policy, 2th. Cambridge; New York:Cambridge University Press, 1988.
    [2] Levinson A, Taylor S M. Unmasking the pollution haven effect. International Economic Review,2008,49(1):223-254.
    [3]魏玮,毕超.环境规制、区际产业转移与污染避难所效应:基于省级面板Poisson模型的实证分析.山西财经大学学报, 2011, 33(8):69-75.
    [4]曾贤刚.环境规制、外商直接投资与"污染避难所"假说:基于中国30个省份面板数据的实证研究.经济理论与经济管理,2010(119):65-71.
    [5]陈刚.FDI竞争、环境规制与污染避难所:对中国式分权的反思.世界经济研究,2009,(6):3-7.
    [6]傅京燕.国际贸易中"污染避难所效应"的实证研究述评.中国人口.资源与环境,2009, 19(4):13-18.
    [7]向晶睛.污染避难所假说:中国的验证.成都:西南财经大学,2010.
    [8]周沂,贺灿飞,刘颖.中国污染密集型产业地理分布研究.自然资源学报, 2015,30(7):1183-1196.
    [9]梁红岩,王静,秦志琴,等.中国污染密集型产业转移及其影响因素研究.生态经济,2016,32(10):32-45.
    [10]崔建鑫,赵海霞.长江三角洲地区污染密集型产业转移及驱动机理.地理研究,2013,34(3):504-512.
    [11]仇方道,蒋涛,张纯敏,等.江苏省污染密集型产业空间转移及影响因素.地理科学, 2013, 33(7):789-796.
    [12]沈静,向澄,柳意云.广东省污染密集型产业转移机制——基于2000~2009年面板数据模型的实证.地理研究,2012(02):357-368.
    [13] List J A, Co C Y. The effects of environmental regulations on foreign direct investment.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2000,40(1):1-20.
    [14] Javorcik B S, Wei S J. Pollution havens and foreign direct investment:dirty secret or popular myth?. Contributions in Economic Analysis&Policy, 2004,3(2).
    [15]朱平芳,张征宇,姜国麟.FDI与环境规制:基于地方分权视角的实证研究.经济研究,2011(6):133-145.
    [16]石广明,王金南,毕军.中国工业二氧化硫排放变化指标分解研究.中国环境科学,2012,32(1):56-61.
    [17] Liang C, Zhang T, Wang Yet al. Sustainable urban materials management for air pollutants mitigation based on urban physical input-output model. Energy, 2012,42:387-392.
    [18] Low P, Yeat A. Do Dirty Industries Migrate? International Trade and the Environment. Word Bank Discussion Papers, 1992:159.
    [19]贺灿飞,周沂.环境经济地理研究.北京:科学出版社, 2016.
    [20]滕堂伟,胡森林,侯路瑶.长江经济带产业转移态势与承接的空间格局.经济地理, 2016,36(5):93-99.
    [21]夏友富.外商投资中国污染密集产业现状、后果及其对策研究.管理世界, 1999(3):109-123.
    [22] Tobey J A. The effects of domestic environmental policies on patterns of world trade:An empirical test. Kyklos, 1990, 43(2):191-209.
    [23]赵细康.环境保护与产业国际竞争力——理论与实证分析.北京:中国社会科学出版社, 2003:215-218.
    [24] Becker R, Henderson V. Effects of air quality regulations on polluting industries. Journal of Political Economy, 2000, 108(2):379-421.
    [25] Combes P, Overman H G. The spatial distribution of economic activities in the European Union//Henderson J V, Thisse J F. Handbook of regional and urban economics. Amsterdam:Elsevier-North Holland:2004:2845-2909.
    (1)高技术产业是指R&D经费支出占主营业务收入比重较高的制造业行业,包括医药,航空、航天器及设备,电子及通信设备,计算机及办公设备,医疗仪器设备及仪器仪表,信息化学品等6大类制造业(高技术产业分类统计目录)。