碳交易政策下汽车供应链减排成本分担合作研究

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Cooperative study on emission cost sharing of automobile supply chain under carbon trading policy 作者：莫时平 ; 廖志高 ; 郭晓炜 英文作者：MO Shiping;LIAO Zhigao;GUO Xiaowei;School of Economics and Management, Guangxi University of Science and Technology;Graduate Department, Guangxi University of Science and Technology; 关键词：汽车供应链 ; 碳交易 ; 减排成本分担 ; 消费者补贴 英文关键词：automobile supply chain;;carbon trading policy;;emission cost sharing;;consumer subsidy 中文刊名：广西科技大学学报 英文刊名：Journal of Guangxi University of Science and Technology 机构：广西科技大学经济与管理学院;广西科技大学研究生工作处; 出版日期：2019-07-04 15:08 出版单位：广西科技大学学报 年：2019 期：03 基金：广西哲学社会科学基金项目(17FJY007)资助 语种：中文; 页：79-85 页数：7 CN：45-1395/T ISSN：2095-7335 分类号：F426.471;F274;X196

摘要

在碳交易政策下考虑消费者补贴因素的影响,以由单一制造商低碳技术研发和单一经销商产品促销组成的二级汽车供应链为对象,研究低碳技术研发成本和促销成本的分担问题.首先分析了供应链分散决策和集中决策的减排决策,证明集中决策优于分散决策能实现供应链的帕累托改进.在此基础上,提出了3种不同成本分担合作方式(低碳技术研发分担合作、促销分担合作和成本互担合作)探究其对供应链节点企业和供应链整体的减排策略的影响.研究表明:低碳技术研发分担合作和促销成本分担合作能提高供应链利润和减排量.成本互担合作相较于其他两种方式在满足一定条件下更能体现供应链经济效益和环境效益的最大化,实现帕累托最优.
        Considering the influence of consumer subsidies under the carbon trading policy, this paper studies the sharing of the research and development costs of low-carbon technologies and promotion costs in the two-level automobile supply chain composed of the research and development of lowcarbon technologies by a single manufacturer and the promotion of products by a single dealer. Firstly, the emission reduction decisions of supply chain decentralized decision-making and centralized decision-making are analyzed. It is proved that centralized decision-making is better than decentralized decision-making to realize pareto improvement of supply chain. On this basis, three different ways of cost-sharing cooperation(research and development of low-carbon technology, promotion and costsharing cooperation) are proposed to explore their impact on the emission reduction strategies of nodal enterprises in the supply chain and the supply chain as a whole. Research shows that sharing cooperation in R&D and promotion of low-carbon technologies can improve supply chain profit and emission reduction. Compared with other two methods, cost-sharing cooperation can better reflect the maximization of economic and environmental benefits of the supply chain under certain conditions and achieve pareto optimization.

引文

[1]李佳玲,廖志高.低碳约束下的西部11省市物流效率分析[J].广西科技大学学报,2015,26(3):99-105.
    [2]魏守道.碳交易政策下供应链减排研发的微分博弈研究[J].管理学报,2018,15(5):782-790.
    [3]李骏,张晓艳,付磊,等.汽车低碳化与动力总成技术创新[J].汽车技术,2017(4):1-5.
    [4]罗春林.基于政府补贴的电动汽车供应链策略研究[J].管理评论,2014,26(12):198-205.
    [5] MATTHEWS H D,GILLETT N P,STOTT P A,et al. The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions[J]. Nature,2009,459(7248):829-832.
    [6]张晓艳,王永军,李骏,等.中国汽车低碳化系统工程研究[J].中国工程科学,2018,20(1):23-29.
    [7]赵振家,张鹏,赵明楠,等.汽车制造过程的能耗及碳排放分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2017,27(S1):186-190.
    [8]杨仕辉,付菊.基于消费者补贴的供应链碳减排优化[J].产经评论,2015,6(6):104-115.
    [9]王金宵.碳配额交易机制下汽车供应链产品定价及利益协调研究[D].北京,北京交通大学,2017.