基于模糊综合评价法的社区居民旅游扶贫满意度研究——以崇礼、张北县为例

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Community Residents' Satisfaction about Tourism Poverty Alleviation Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method——Taking Chongli and Zhangbei Counties as an Example 作者：张亚南 ; 张琪 ; 殷海萍 ; 董劭璇 ; 贾哲 英文作者：ZHANG Ya-nan;ZHANG Qi;YIN Hai-ping;DONG Shao-xuan;JIA Zhe;School of Landscape Architecture and Tourism, Hebei Agricultural University; 关键词：旅游扶贫 ; 社区居民 ; 因子分析 ; 模糊综合评价法 英文关键词：tourism poverty alleviation;;community residents;;factor analysis;;fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method 中文刊名：遵义师范学院学报 英文刊名：Journal of Zunyi Normal University 机构：河北农业大学园林与旅游学院; 出版日期：2019-08-02 出版单位：遵义师范学院学报 年：2019 期：04 基金：河北农业大学大学生创新创业训练计划项目(201810086046);河北农业大学第十批教学研究项目(2018YB70);; 河北省高等教育教学改革研究与实践项目(2017GJJG055) 语种：中文; 页：62-66+104 页数：6 CN：52-5026/G4 ISSN：1009-3583 分类号：F592.7;F323.8;C81

摘要

文章通过对崇礼、张北两县社区居民旅游扶贫满意度调查,运用SPSS22.0进行因子分析,将旅游扶贫满意度的评价因子归为社会效益、经济效益、利益分配、环境破坏、文化破坏五类。运用模糊综合评价法对旅游扶贫满意度的各层次因子进行分析,发现社区居民对旅游扶贫的总体满意度一般。其中,社区居民对社会效益、经济效益、利益分配以及环境效益满意度较为一般,四者在旅游扶贫过程中存在一定的问题;社区居民对文化破坏的满意度较低,但也说明研究区文化破坏程度较小。文章在此基础上提出建议,为两县旅游扶贫提供借鉴。
        Based on the investigation of the satisfaction degree of community residents in Chongli and Zhangbei counties, this paper makes a factor analysis by using SPSS22.0. The evaluation factors of satisfaction about tourismpoverty alleviation are classified into five categories: social benefits, economic benefits, benefit distribution, environmental damage and cultural damage. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is used to analyze the various level factors of satisfaction about tourismpoverty alleviation, and it is found that the overall satisfaction of community residents to tourism poverty alleviation is general. Among them, community residents are generally satisfied with social benefits, economic benefits, benefit distribution and environmental benefits, and there are some problems in the process of tourismpoverty alleviation, and the satisfaction of community residents with cultural destruction is low. However, it also shows that the degree of cultural damage in the study area is small. On this basis, this paper puts forward some suggestions to offer some ideas for tourismpoverty alleviation in the two counties.

引文

[1]冯学钢.皖西地区旅游开发扶贫探讨[J].经济地理,1999,19(2):112-116.
    [2]赵丽丽.我国西南地区旅游扶贫战略研究[J].特区经济,2009(9):136-137.
    [3]刘益,陈烈.旅游扶贫及其开发模式研究[J].热带地理,2004,24(4):396-400.
    [4]邓小海,曾亮,罗明义,等.云南乌蒙山片区所属县旅游扶贫效应分析[J].生态经济,2015,31(2):134-138.
    [5]漆明亮.社区参与旅游扶贫及模式研究[D].成都:西南财经大学,2006.[6陈明月,麻学锋.凤凰旅游对贫困人口的影响分析——基于人类发展指数的视角[J].遵义师范学院学报,2011,13(6):30-36.
    [7]荆丽娟.河北这五年精准脱贫[EB/OL].(2017-08-21)[2019-01-22].https://www.zjknews.com.
    [8]汪侠,甄峰,沈丽珍,等.基于贫困居民视角的旅游扶贫满意度评价[J].地理研究,2017,36(12):2355-2368.
    [9]白梅.基于模糊综合评价法的网络购物顾客满意度测评研究[D].大连:东北财经大学,2012.
    [10]张亚南,张琪,孙蓉蓉,等.崇礼、张北社区居民旅游扶贫满意度调查[J].合作经济与科技,2018(5):148-151.
    [11]张琪,张亚南,孙蓉蓉,等.旅游扶贫视角下游客对张家口冬奥会的认知度研究[J].林业与生态科学,2018,33(2):231-236.
    [12]梁留科,孙淑英,刘英.2008,北京奥运效应及其旅游影响分析[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2005,5(2):82-86.
    [13]禹玉环.遵义市体验型农家乐旅游发展策略探讨[J].遵义师范学院学报,2011,13(2):57-63.