盐胁迫下谷子根部细胞内pH值测定

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Determination of pH Value in Root Cells of Foxtail Millet under Salt Stress 作者：李小波 ; 潘教文 ; 丁国华 ; 李臻 ; 王庆国 ; 刘炜 英文作者：Li Xiaobo;Pan Jiaowen;Ding Guohua;Li Zhen;Wang Qingguo;Liu Wei;Biotechnology Research Center, Shandong Acadamy of Agricultural Sciences/Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement,Ecology and Physiology;School of Life Sciences and Technology, Harbin Normal University;College of Life Sciences, Shandong Normal University; 关键词：谷子 ; 盐胁迫 ; BCECF-AM荧光染料 ; 根部细胞内pH值 英文关键词：Foxtail milliet(Setaria italic L.);;Salt stress;;BCECF-AM fluorescent dye;;Intracellular pH value in root 中文刊名：山东农业科学 英文刊名：Shandong Agricultural Sciences 机构：山东省农业科学院生物技术研究中心/山东省作物遗传改良与生理生态重点实验室;哈尔滨师范大学生命科学与技术学院;山东师范大学生命科学学院; 出版日期：2019-02-28 出版单位：山东农业科学 年：2019 期：02 基金：山东省自然科学基金面上项目(ZR2016CM23);山东省自然科学基金青年基金项目(ZR2014CQ24);; 山东省农业科学院青年英才计划项目(2016—2018);山东省农业科学院青年基金项目(2014QNM37) 语种：中文; 页：46-50 页数：5 CN：37-1148/S ISSN：1001-4942 分类号：S515

摘要

利用BCECF-AM荧光染料和激光共聚焦显微镜测定谷子根部细胞内的荧光强度,进而换算成细胞内pH值,以此来研建测定谷子根部细胞内pH值的方法。结果显示:正常水培条件下,谷子品种YG2和AN04根部细胞内pH值分别为5.85±0.11和5.77±0.26;盐处理下YG2和AN04根部细胞内pH值分别达到6.21±0.26和6.19±0.17,即盐敏感品种AN04根部细胞盐处理后pH值变化较大,提高7.28%,而抗盐品种YG2提高6.15%。这说明抗盐品种盐胁迫下细胞内pH值受外界环境影响较小,对盐害的耐受力较高。该方法用来定量测定细胞内pH值具有可信性,亦可作为评价植物耐受胁迫能力的辅助手段。
        The fluorescent probe of BCECF-AM was used to measure the intracellular pH value in root cells of foxtail millet in this research. The fluorescence intensity was detected with laser scanning confocal microscopy, and then was converted to pH value. The results showed that the pH values in root cells of the foxtail millet varieties YG2 and AN04 were 5.85±0.11 and 5.77±0.26 respectively under normal hydroponic culture, but increased to 6.21±0.26 and 6.19±0.17 respectively under salt treatment. The pH value of salt-sensitive variety AN04 increased by 7.2%, which was a little more than that of salt-resistant variety YG2 of 6.15% under salt stress. The results indicated that the intracellular pH value of salt-tolerant varieties was less affected by external environment, and their tolerance to salt damage was higher. This method was reliable for the quantitative determination of intracellular pH value, and it could be used as an auxiliary means to evaluate the tolerance of plants to stress.

引文

[1] 王合云,李红丽,董智,等. 滨海盐碱地不同造林树种林地土壤盐碱化特征[J]. 土壤学报,2015,52(3):706-712.
    [2] Yang Y Q,Guo Y. Unraveling salt stress signaling in plants[J]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology,2018,60(9):796-804.
    [3] Rozema J,Flowers T. Crops for a salinized world[J]. Science,2008,322(5907):1478-1480.
    [4] Munns R. Genes and salt tolerance: bringing them together[J]. New Phytologist, 2005,167(3):645-663.
    [5] 张建锋,张旭东,周金星,等. 世界盐碱地资源及其改良利用的基本措施[J]. 水土保持研究,2006,12(6):28-30.
    [6] Liu Z X,Zhang H X,Yang X Y,et al. Effects of soil salinity on growth,ion relations,and compatible solute accumulation of two sumac species:Rhus glabra and Rhus trilobata[J]. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis,2013, 44(21):3187-3204.
    [7] 柳参奎,张欣欣,程玉祥. “植物细胞内pH调控系统”是适应环境逆境的一个耐性机制?[J]. 分子植物育种,2004,2(2):179-186.
    [8] 周文彬,邱保胜. 植物细胞内pH值的测定[J]. 植物生理学通讯,2004,40(6):724-728.
    [9] 李顺国,刘斐,刘猛,等. 我国谷子产业现状、发展趋势及对策建议[J]. 农业现代化研究,2014,35(5):531-535.
    [10] 贾冠清,刁现民. 谷子(Setaria italica (L.) P. Beauv.)作为功能基因组研究模式植物的发展现状及趋势[J]. 生命科学,2017,29(3):292-301.
    [11] 姜淑媛,张丽霞. 茶树荧光性绿斑病叶胞内pH值变化[J]. 中国茶叶,2009,31(2):27-29.
    [12] Krebs M, Beyhl D, G?rlich E,et al. Arabidopsis V-ATPase activity at the tonoplast is required for efficient nutrient storage but not for sodium accumulation[J]. PNAS,2010,107(7):3251-3256.
    [13] Bassil E, Tajima H, Liang Y C,et al. The Arabidopsis Na+/H+ antiporters NHX1 and NHX2 control vacuolar pH and K+ homeostasis to regulate growth,flower development,and reproduction[J]. The Plant Cell,2011,23(9):3482-3497.