文山烟叶均质性评价方法研究
|
摘要
[目的]筛选烟叶均质化评价中数据处理方法。[方法]对比变异系数法、方差分析法和数据标准化后方差分析3种方法,通过对文山州烟叶质量进行均质性评价,分析3种方法的优缺点。[结果]变异系数法简单快速,但无法比较大小,也无法判断偏离方法;方差分析法可以克服变异系数法的缺点,但受干扰太多;数据标准化后方差分析法,可以克服上述方法的缺点。3种方法中变异系数法的评价方法与其他2种方法差别较大;方差分析法和数据标准化后方差分析法评价结果基本一致稍有不同。[结论]数据标准化方差分析法可以作为烟叶均值性的评价方法。
[Objective] The research aimed to screen data processing methods in tobacco leaves homogenization evaluation.[Method]This study compared the three methods of variation coefficient,variance analysis and standardized post variance analysis,and the advantages and disadvantages of the three methods were analyzed by comparing the evaluation of homogeneity of tobacco leaves quality in Wenshan. [Result]The variation coefficient method was simple and fast, but it could not compare the size and could not judge the deviation method; variance analysis method could overcome the shortcomings of the variation coefficient method, but was too much interference; standardized post variance analysis could overcome the shortcomings of the above methods. The evaluation method of the variation coefficient method was quite different from the other methods, and variance analysis method and standardized post variance analysis were basically consistent and slightly different. [Conclusion] Standardized post variance analysis can be used as an evaluation method for homogenization of tobacco leaves.
[Objective] The research aimed to screen data processing methods in tobacco leaves homogenization evaluation.[Method]This study compared the three methods of variation coefficient,variance analysis and standardized post variance analysis,and the advantages and disadvantages of the three methods were analyzed by comparing the evaluation of homogeneity of tobacco leaves quality in Wenshan. [Result]The variation coefficient method was simple and fast, but it could not compare the size and could not judge the deviation method; variance analysis method could overcome the shortcomings of the variation coefficient method, but was too much interference; standardized post variance analysis could overcome the shortcomings of the above methods. The evaluation method of the variation coefficient method was quite different from the other methods, and variance analysis method and standardized post variance analysis were basically consistent and slightly different. [Conclusion] Standardized post variance analysis can be used as an evaluation method for homogenization of tobacco leaves.
引文
[1] 王保义,杜元东,滕兆波.烟叶原料生产应满足卷烟工业的要求[J].中国烟草科学,2002(1):30-32.
[2] 姜成康.在2008年全国烟草专卖局长、公司总经理座谈会上的讲话[N].东方烟草报,2008-07-17.
[3] 朱尊权.从卷烟发展史看“中式卷烟”[J].烟草科技,2004(4):4-7,41.
[4] 周冀衡,张建平.构建中式卷烟优质特色烟叶原料保障体系是新形式下中国烟草的战略选择[J].中国烟草学报,2008,14(1):42-46,57.
[5] 肖如武,陈越立.烟叶配方打叶均质化控制技术探讨[J].科技信息,2012(17):2.
[6] 王发勇,张春磊,喻绍新,等.全程实现打叶夏烤均质化加工的研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2018,46(12):11-13,16.
[7] 熊淑萍,马新明,石媛媛,等.不同生育时期烟草生长与生态因子关系动态模拟模型研究[J].河南农业大学学报,2005,39(3):321-325.
[8] 陈义强,范坚强,包可翔,等.不同移栽期烟草生育期气温因子主成分与烟叶品质相关性分析[J].广东农业科学,2017,44(11):1-6.
[9] 易建华,彭新辉,邓小华,等.气候和土壤及其互作对湖南烤烟还原糖、烟碱和总氮含量的影响[J].生态学报,2010,30(16):4467-4475.
[10] 李玲燕,徐宜民,王树声.气候因子对烤烟香气物质的影响研究进展[J].中国烟草科学,2015,36(1):107-113.
[11] 周效峰,金亚波.气象因子、土壤理化性状与烟叶内在化学成分的关联度研究[J].湖南农业科学,2016(4):76-79.
[2] 姜成康.在2008年全国烟草专卖局长、公司总经理座谈会上的讲话[N].东方烟草报,2008-07-17.
[3] 朱尊权.从卷烟发展史看“中式卷烟”[J].烟草科技,2004(4):4-7,41.
[4] 周冀衡,张建平.构建中式卷烟优质特色烟叶原料保障体系是新形式下中国烟草的战略选择[J].中国烟草学报,2008,14(1):42-46,57.
[5] 肖如武,陈越立.烟叶配方打叶均质化控制技术探讨[J].科技信息,2012(17):2.
[6] 王发勇,张春磊,喻绍新,等.全程实现打叶夏烤均质化加工的研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2018,46(12):11-13,16.
[7] 熊淑萍,马新明,石媛媛,等.不同生育时期烟草生长与生态因子关系动态模拟模型研究[J].河南农业大学学报,2005,39(3):321-325.
[8] 陈义强,范坚强,包可翔,等.不同移栽期烟草生育期气温因子主成分与烟叶品质相关性分析[J].广东农业科学,2017,44(11):1-6.
[9] 易建华,彭新辉,邓小华,等.气候和土壤及其互作对湖南烤烟还原糖、烟碱和总氮含量的影响[J].生态学报,2010,30(16):4467-4475.
[10] 李玲燕,徐宜民,王树声.气候因子对烤烟香气物质的影响研究进展[J].中国烟草科学,2015,36(1):107-113.
[11] 周效峰,金亚波.气象因子、土壤理化性状与烟叶内在化学成分的关联度研究[J].湖南农业科学,2016(4):76-79.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |