用户名: 密码: 验证码:
青藏高原东南缘沙地3种治沙草本根系形态格局特征
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Root morphology patterns of three grasses used to restore the desert on the Southeast Tibetan Plateau
  • 作者:陈有军 ; 苟小林 ; 孙建 ; 董全民 ; 周青平
  • 英文作者:CHEN Youjun;GOU Xiaolin;SUN Jian;DONG Quanmin;ZHOU Qingping;College of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, Qinghai University, Key Laboratory of Superior Forage Germplasm in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau;Institute of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, Southwest Minzu University;Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modelling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences;
  • 关键词:燕麦 ; 垂穗披碱草 ; 以礼草 ; 根系 ; 治沙
  • 英文关键词:Avena sativa;;Elymus nutans;;Roegneria hirsuta;;root system;;desert restoration
  • 中文刊名:草业科学
  • 英文刊名:Pratacultural Science
  • 机构:青海大学农牧学院/青海省青藏高原优良牧草种质资源利用重点实验室;西南民族大学青藏高原研究院;中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所生态系统网络观测与模拟重点实验室;
  • 出版日期:2019-04-15
  • 出版单位:草业科学
  • 年:2019
  • 期:04
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金项目(31802123);; 国家重点专项(2017FY100602);; 国家牧草产业技术体系(CARS-34)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:15+224-234
  • 页数:12
  • CN:62-1069/S
  • ISSN:1001-0629
  • 分类号:S812.6
摘要
植物根系是沙化地中植物固沙的重要基础,为明确不同治沙草本植物根系形态格局特征,本研究在青藏高原东南缘比较了资源圃和沙化地中一年生燕麦(Avena sativa)、多年生垂穗披碱草(Elymus nutans)和以礼草(Kengyilia hirsuta)地下根系根尖数、分枝数、平均直径、根长、根表面积、根体积的形态特征,分析了3种草本根尖比、根长比、根表面积比、根体积比的形态格局特征,探讨3种草本根系对沙化环境的适应能力。结果表明,一年生燕麦根系表面积和根体积在资源圃中显著高于沙地(P <0.05);垂穗披碱草根系形态在资源圃和沙地中没有明显差异(P> 0.05);以礼草根系根尖数、根分枝数、根长、根表面积在资源圃中明显低于沙地,但是以礼草根系平均直径在资源圃中明显高于沙地(P <0.05)。一年生燕麦根系体积在沙地中大量减少,增加0.2~0.4 mm各径级下的根尖比、根长比、表面积比、体积比用于适应沙化环境;多年生的垂穗披碱草并未显著调整自身根系结构用于适应沙化环境;多年生以礼草通过减少了较大径级(0.7~0.8 mm)的根长和表面积来增加了小径级(0.1~0.2 mm)的根长、表面积和体积的格局,来增加对沙化环境的适应性;垂穗披碱草和以礼草根系形态格局比燕麦根系形态格局更加适应沙化环境。
        The roots of plants are an important component in desert restoration. To understand the root morphology patterns of grasses being used to recover deserts, we studied grass roots in the Southeast Tibetan Plateau. Roots of the annual grass Avena sativa and the perennial grasses Elymus nutans and Roegneria hirsuta were collected from a field gene bank and sandy land. The tips, forks, average diameter, length, surface, and volume of the grass roots were compared and the ratios of the root tips, length, surface, and volume were analyzed. We discussed the suitability of different root morphologies to desert environments. The results show that the root surface and volume of A. sativa in the field gene bank were significantly higher than those in the sandy land. The root morphology of E. nutans had no significant differences between the field gene bank and sandy land. Additionally, the root tips, forks, length, and surface of R. hirsuta in the field gene bank were significantly lower than those from the sandy land; however, the average root diameter of R. hirsuta was significantly higher. There was a significant decrease in the root volume of A. sativa in the sandy land compared with the field gene bank. However, A. sativa increased the ratios of the root tips, length, surface, and volume, under a diameter of 0.2~ 0.4 mm, to suit desert environments. E. nutans did not significantly change its root morphology to suit desert environments. R. hirsuta increased the root length, surface, and volume patterns, under a diameter of 0.1~0.2 mm, to suit desert environments by decreasing the root length and surface between 0.7 and 0.8 mm. The root morphology patterns of E. nutans and R. hirsuta are more suitable to desert environments than those of A. sativa.
引文
[1]LI X R,KONG D S,TAN H J,WANG X P.Changes in soil and vegetation following stabilisation of dunes in the southeastern fringe of the Tengger Desert,China.Plant and Soil,2007,300(1/2):221-231.
    [2]ZHA Y,GAO J.Characteristics of desertification and its rehabilitation in China.Journal of Arid Environments,1997,37(3):419-432.
    [3]王堃,吕进英,邵新庆.沙漠化草地的恢复与重建途径.草地学报,2004,12(3):240-245.WANG K,LYU J Y,SHAO X Q.Measures of Restoring and Rebuilding Desertified Grassland.Acta Agrestia Sinica,2004,12(3):240-245.
    [4]曾凯,刘琳,蔡义民,陈有军,陈冬明.高寒沙化草地中先锋灌木根系水浸提液对4种高原牧草的化感效应分析.西北植物学报,2017,37(7):1312-1322.ZENG K,LIU L,CAI Y M,CHEN Y J,CHEN D M.Allelopathy of the root aqueous extracts of pioneer shrub species on alpine desertification meadow.Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica,2017,37(7):1312-1322.
    [5]罗永清,赵学勇,王涛,李玉强.沙地植物根系特征及其与土壤有机碳和总氮的关系.草业学报,2017,26(8):200-206.LUO Y Q,ZHAO X Y,WANG T,LI Y Q.Characteristics of the pant-root systen and its relationship with soil organic carbon and total nitrogen in a degraded sandy grassland.Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2017,26(8):200-206.
    [6]BENLLOCHGONZáLEZ M,SáNCHEZLUCAS R,BENLLOCH M.Effects of olive root warming on potassium transport and plant growth.Journal of Plant Physiology,2017,218:182-188.
    [7]曹成有,朱丽辉,蒋德明,富徭,高菲菲.科尔沁沙地不同人工植物群落对土壤养分和生物活性的影响.水土保持学报,2007,21(1):168-171.CAO Y C,ZHU L H,JIANG D M,FU Y,GAO F F.Effects of artificial sand-fixation communities on soil nutrients and biological properties in Horqin Sandy Land.Journal of Soil and Water Consevaition,2007,21(1):168-171.
    [8]EL-GHANDOUR I A,MONEM M A,MOSTAFA R A K.Nitroge fixation and nutrient uptake by two chickpea genotypes cultivated in sandy soils of Egypt.Folia Microbiologica,1996,41(3):267-271.
    [9]李帅,赵国靖,徐伟洲,高志娟,吴爱姣,徐炳成.白羊草根系形态特征对土壤水分阶段变化的响应.草业学报,2016,25(2):169-177.LI S,ZHAO G J,XU W Z,GAO Z J,WU A J,XU B C.Responses of old world bluestern root sestem to changesinsoul water conditions.Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2016,25(2):169-177.
    [10]单立山,李毅,张荣,张正中,种培芳.降雨格局变化对白刺幼苗根系形态特征的影响.生态学报,2007,37(21):7324-7332.SHAN L S,LI Y,ZHANG R,ZHANG Z Z,CHONG P F.Response of the root morphology of Nitraia tangutorum seedlings to precipitation pattern changes.Acta Ecologica Sinica,2007,37(21):7324-7332.
    [11]ZHOU G,ZHOU X,NIE Y,BAI S H,ZHOU L,SHAO J,CHENG W,WANG J,FU J.Drought-induced changes in root biomass largely result from altered root morphological traits:Evidence from a synthesis of global field trials.Plant,Cell&Environment,2018,10(3):330-336.
    [12]CRAINE J M,LEE W G,BOND W J,WILLIAMS R J,JOHNSON L C.Environmental constraints on a global relationship among leaf and root traits of grasses.Ecology,2005,86(1):12-19.
    [13]BUTTERFIELD B J,BRIGGS J M.Regeneration niche differentiates functional strategies of desert woody plant species.Oecologia,2001,165(2):477-487.
    [14]王莺,李耀辉,孙旭映.气候变化对黄河源区生态环境的影响.草业科学,2015,32(4):539-551.WANG Y,LI Y H,SUN X Y.Impact of climate change on the eco-environment in the Yellow River Source.Pratacultural Science,2015,32(4):539-551.
    [15]鲁春霞,谢高地,肖玉,于云江.青藏高原生态系统服务功能的价值评估.生态学报,2004,24(12):2749-2755.LU C X,XIE G D,XIAO Y,YU Y J.Ecosystem diversity and economic valuation of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.Acta Ecologica Sinica,2004,24(12):2749-2755.
    [16]蒲琴,胡玉福,蒋双龙,何剑锋,舒向阳,杨泽鹏.不同生态治理措施下高寒沙化草地土壤氮素变化特征.草业学报,2016,25(7):24-33.PU Q,HU Y F,JIANG S L,HE J F,SHU X Y,YANG Z P.Soil nitrogen characteristics of grasslands on sandy soil undergoing vegetation restoration.Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2016,25(7):24-33.
    [17]苟小林,周青平,陈有军,魏小星,涂卫国.青藏高原不同气候区高寒沙地两种优势植物及其根际土壤的养分特征.植物生态学报,2018,42(1):133-142.GOU X L,ZHOU Q P,CHEN Y J,WEI X X,TU W G.Characteristics of nutrients in two dominant plant species and rhizospheric soils in alpine desert of the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau under contrasting climates.Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology,2018,42(1):133-142.
    [18]周青平,苟小林,田莉华,陈有军,高树琴,白文明,张文浩.寒冷区早晚熟燕麦品种的生产性能分析.科学通报,2018,63(17):1722-1730.ZHOU Q P,GOU X L,TIAN L H,CHEN Y J,GAO S Q,BAI W M,ZHANG W H.Performances of early and late maturing oat varieties in cold regions.Chinese Science Bulletin,2018,63(17):1722-1730.
    [19]肖雪君,周青平,陈有军,杜忠,柏晓玲,田莉华,彭先琴.播种量对高寒牧区林纳燕麦生产性能及光合特性的影响.草业科学,2017,34(4):761-771.XIAO X J,ZHOU Q P,CHEN Y J,DU Z,BAI X L,TIAN L H,PENG X Q.Effect of seeding rate on production performance and photosynthetic characteristics of Avena sativa cv.LENA in alpine pastoral regions.Pratacultural Science,2017,34(4):761-771.
    [20]林振耀,吴祥定.青藏高原气候区划.地理学报,1981,36(1):22-32.LIN Z Y,WU X D.Climatic regionalization of the Qinghai-Xizang plateau.Acta Geographic Sinica,1981,36(1):22-32.
    [21]舒向阳,胡玉福,蒋双龙,蒲琴,袁铖铭,彭佳佳.川西北草地沙化对土壤颗粒组成和土壤磷钾养分的影响.干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(8):173-179.SHU X Y,HU Y F,JIANG S L,PU Q,YUAN C M,PENG J J.Influences of grassland desertification on soil particles composition and soil phosphorus and potassium nutrients in northwestern Sichuan.Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment,2015,29(8):173-179.
    [22]周青平.高原燕麦的栽培与管理.南昌:凤凰科学技术出版社,2014:23.ZHOU Q P.Cultivation and Management of Alpine Oats.Nanchang:Fenghuang Science and Technology Press,2014:23.
    [23]张晓娜,哈达朝鲁,潘庆民.刈割干扰下内蒙古草原两种丛生禾草繁殖策略的适应性调节.植物生态学报,2010,34(3):253-262.ZHANG X N,Hadachaolu,PAN Q M.Adaptive regulation in reproductive strategy of two bunchgrasses under mowing disturbance in Inner Mongolia grassland.Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology,2010,34(3):253-262.
    [24]柯君,王慧春,周华坤,赵新全,刘泽华.三江源区高寒草甸43种植物繁殖体质量比较.草业科学,2010,27(3):15-20.KE J,WANG H C,ZHOU H K,ZHAO X Q,LIU Z H.A comparative study on propagule weight of 43 plant species at the alpine meadow in the source region of Three Rivers.Pratacultural Science,2010,27(3):15-20.
    [25]许国芬,周青平,颜红波,刘文辉.施氮水平对燕麦产量与养分吸收的影响.中国草地学报,2009,31(6):20-24.XU G F,ZHOU Q P,YAN H B,LIU W H.Effect of fertilizer N on yield nutrients uptake of Oat.Chinese Journalof Grassland,2009,31(6):20-24.
    [26]马斌,刘景辉,杨彦明,赵宝平,袁梦君,米俊珍.连续施用保水材料对旱作条件下土壤特性及燕麦生长的影响.生态学报,2017,37(17):5650-5661.MA B,LIU J H,YANG Y M,ZHAO B P,YUAN M J,MI J Z.Effects of continuous application of water-retaining materials on soil characteristics and oat(Avena nuda L.)growth under dry-farming conditions.Acta Ecologica Sinca,2017,37(17):5650-5661.
    [27]刘文辉.播期对三种裸燕麦品种生长特性的影响.草地学报,2016,24(5):1032-1040.LIU W H.Effects of planting dates on the growth characteristics of three naked oats varieties.Acta Agrestia Sinica,2016,24(5):1032-1040.
    [28]潘伟斌,黄培.四种短命植物若干生物学生态学特性的研究.植物生态学报,1995,19(1):85-91.PAN W B,HUANG P Y.The Ecology of Four Ephemeral Plants.Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology,1995,19(1):85-91.
    [29]ARONSON J A,KIGEL J,SHMIDA A.Comparative plant sizes and reproductive strategies in desert and Mediterranean populations of ephemeral plants.Israel Journal of Plant Sciences,1990,39(4/6):413-430.
    [30]TORRES R L,LLOREDA M D,GONZALEZ P J,GARCIA-GUTIERREZ J R L,TRUJILLO P B.Effect of soil management strategies on the characteristics of the grapevine root system in irrigated vineyards under semi-arid conditions.Australian Journal of Grape And Wine Research,2018,24:439-449.
    [31]DONG C,HU D,FU Y,WANG M,LIU H.Analysis and optimization of the effect of light and nutrient solution on wheat growth and development using an inverse system model strategy.Computers&Electronics in Agriculture,2014(109):221-231.
    [32]朱志红,刘建秀,郑伟.资源获得性和种内竞争对垂穗披碱草生长繁殖的影响.西北植物学报,2005,25(10):2056-2061.ZHU Z H,LIU J X,ZHENG W.Influence of resource availability and intraspecific competition on Elymus nutans growth and reproduction.Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica,2005,25(10):2056-2061.
    [33]张卫红,刘大林,苗彦军,闫天芳,蔺永和,徐雅梅.西藏3种野生牧草苗期对干旱胁迫的响应.生态学报,2017,37(21):7277-7285.ZHANG W H,LIU D L,MIAO Y J,YAN T F,LIN Y H,XU Y M.Drought stress responses of the seedlings of three wild forages in Tibet.Acta Ecologica Sinca,2017,37(21):7277-7285.
    [34]杨小林,张希明,李义玲,李绍才,孙海龙.塔克拉玛干沙漠腹地3种植物根系构型及其生境适应策略.植物生态学报,2008,32(6):1268-1276.YANG X L,ZHANG X M,LI Y L,LI S C,SUN H L.Analysis of root architecture and root adaptive strategy in the Taklimakan Desert area of China.Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology,2008,32(6):1268-1276.
    [35]MOMMER L,VISSER E J W,RUIJVEN J V,CALUWE H D,PIERIK R,K.Contrasting root behaviour in two grass species:Atest of functionality in dynamic heterogeneous conditions.Plant and Soil,2011,344(1/2):347-360.
    [36]宋自影,王飞,胡林,穆兴民,康绍忠.根系对土壤机械压力影响的模拟试验.农业工程学报,2011,27(11):101-106.SONG Z Y,WANG F,HU L,MU X M,KANG S Z.Simulation experiment of roots system effects on soil mechanical pressure.Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2011,27(11):101-106.
    [37]钟荣华,鲍玉海,贺秀斌,高进长,阎丹丹,李峪,王铭锋.三峡水库消落带4种草本根系抗拉特性及根系粘聚力.水土保持学报,2015,29(4):188-194.ZHONG R H,BAO Y H,HE X B,GAO J C,YAN D D,LI Y,WANG M F.Root tensile properties and root cohesion of 4herbaceous plant species in the riparian zone of Three Corges Reservoir.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,29(4):188-194.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700