用户名: 密码: 验证码:
新烟碱类及其他稻田杀虫剂对褐飞虱的室内药效评价
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Laboratory Bioactivity Study on Neonicotinoid and Other Rice Paddy Used Insecticides Against the Brown Planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens(St?l)(Hemiptera: Delphacidae)
  • 作者:何佳春 ; 李波 ; 谢茂成 ; 赖凤香 ; 胡国文 ; 傅强
  • 英文作者:HE Jiachun;LI Bo;XIE Maocheng;LAI Fengxiang;HU Guowen;FU Qiang;State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology, China National Rice Research Institute;College of Plant Protection, Yunnan Agricultural University;Agricultural Bureau of Zhaoping,Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region;
  • 关键词:褐飞虱 ; 杀虫剂药效 ; 速效性 ; 持效性 ; 杀成虫活性 ; 杀卵活性
  • 英文关键词:Nilaparvata lugens;;bioactivity;;short-term efficiency;;persistences;;bioactivity against adult;;ovicidal activity
  • 中文刊名:中国水稻科学
  • 英文刊名:Chinese Journal of Rice Science
  • 机构:中国水稻研究所水稻生物学国家重点实验室;云南农业大学植物保护学院;广西壮族自治区昭平县农业局;
  • 出版日期:2019-09-10
  • 出版单位:中国水稻科学
  • 年:2019
  • 期:05
  • 基金:国家重点研发计划资助项目(2016YFD0200801);; 中国农业科学院创新工程创新团队资助项目;; 国家水稻产业技术体系资助项目(CARS-01-35)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:87-98
  • 页数:12
  • CN:33-1146/S
  • ISSN:1001-7216
  • 分类号:S435.112.3
摘要
【目的】系统评价市场上常用杀虫剂对褐飞虱不同虫态的作用特性,为选择对口药剂进行防治提供依据。【方法】采用稻苗浸渍法,在室内条件下测定了9种新烟碱类药剂和10种其他类型杀虫剂对褐飞虱不同虫态的杀虫活性、速效性和持效性。【结果】1)杀虫活性:不同杀虫剂活性存在显著差异。其中,烯啶虫胺、噻虫胺、毒死蜱、氟啶虫胺腈、呋虫胺和环氧虫啶活性最好,其次为哒嗪硫磷、乙基多杀菌素、吡蚜酮、异丙威,阿维菌素;其余药剂中噻虫嗪、甲维盐、氟啶虫酰胺对2~3龄若虫有一定活性而对4~5龄虫活性差,噻嗪酮、吡虫啉、噻虫啉、啶虫脒、氯噻啉对两种虫态的活性均较差。2)速效性:毒死蜱、哒嗪硫磷的速效性最好,异丙威、呋虫胺、烯啶虫胺、噻虫胺等次之,吡蚜酮最差。3)持效性:吡蚜酮、呋虫胺、烯啶虫胺、噻虫胺、环氧虫啶持效期>15d,其中吡蚜酮最好,药后0、5和10 d连续3批接的试虫死亡率无显著差异。4)成虫:呋虫胺、烯啶虫胺、噻虫胺、环氧虫啶、毒死蜱、异丙威、吡蚜酮对雌雄成虫均有效,类似于若虫。5)卵:毒死蜱、烯啶虫胺、呋虫胺和噻虫胺对卵及孵化的若虫均有效;吡蚜酮、环氧虫啶、异丙威等无明显杀卵活性,但吡蚜酮对孵化若虫有较好的杀虫活性。【结论】19种药剂中,适于褐飞虱防治的有吡蚜酮、烯啶虫胺、呋虫胺、噻虫胺、环氧虫啶、氟啶虫胺腈、毒死蜱、哒嗪硫磷、异丙威共9种。其中,吡蚜酮持效性最佳且对卵之外各虫态活性较好,但速效性最差。呋虫胺、烯啶虫胺、噻虫胺和环氧虫啶等的速效性、持效性均较突出,且前三者对各虫态均有效。氟啶虫胺腈杀虫活性和速效性均好,但持效性差于新烟碱类。毒死蜱和哒嗪硫磷可单独或在防治其他害虫时兼防治褐飞虱,其中毒死蜱速效性最好,适合于大虫量时快速压低虫量。异丙威杀虫活性弱于新烟碱类,但速效性强于新烟碱类药剂,适合与吡蚜酮等混用或复配。此外,用于鳞翅目害虫防治的乙基多杀菌素、阿维菌素、甲维盐对褐飞虱有一定活性,适合防治其他害虫时兼治褐飞虱。而其余药剂如吡虫啉、噻嗪酮、噻虫嗪等7种药剂不适用于褐飞虱的防治。
        【Objective】 Bioactivity assessment of mainstream insecticides against the brown planthopper [Nilaparvata lugens(St?l)] was conducted to choose proper insecticide(s) in field conditions.【Method】We evaluated the bioactivities, short-term effectiveness, persistence of 9 neonicotinoid insecticides and other 10 commonly-used chemicals against BPH at various developmental stages by the rice stem-dipping method. 【Result】 1) Bioactivitiy: the bioactivities of the 19 insecticides differed significantly. Among them, nitenpyram, clothianidin, chlorpyrifos, sulfoxaflor, dinotefuran and cycloxaprid showed the best bioactivities to both 2 nd-3 rd instar and 4 th-5 th instar nymphs followed by pyridaphenthione, spinetoram, pymetrozine, isoprocarb and abamectin. However, insecticides such as thiamethoxam, emamectin benzoate, flonicamid only showed some bioactivities against the 2 nd-3 rd instar nymphs but relatively weak bioactivities against the 4 th-5 th instar nymphs. And other insecticides such as buprofezin, imidacloprid, thiacloprid, acetamiprid, imidaclothiz showed low bioactivities against both nymph stages. 2)Short-term effectiveness: chlorpyrifos, pyridaphenthione showed the best performance followed by isoprocarb, dinotefuran, nitenpyram, clothianidin. Pymetrozine showed the slowest effectiveness. 3)Persistence: high effectiveness levels of pymetrozine, dinotefuran, nitenpyram, clothianidin, cycloxaprid were maintained over 15 days. Pymetrozine was the best one, and there was no significant difference in the corrected mortalities of BPH reared on rice plants at 0, 5 and 10 days after pymetrozine treatment. 4)Bioactivities against adults: dinotefuran, nitenpyram, clothianidin, cycloxaprid, chlorpyrifos, isoprocarb, pymetrozine showed obvious bioactivities against adults as well as nymphs. 5)Ovicidal activity: chlorpyrifos, nitenpyram, dinotefuran and clothianidin had significant ovicidal activities. Pymetrozine, cycloxaprid, isoprocarb showed no ovicidal activity, but pymetrozine had insecticidal activity against newly hatched nymphs.【Conclusion】 As for the tested 19 insecticides, only 9 chemicals(pymetrozine, nitenpyram, dinotefuran, clothianidin, cycloxaprid, sulfoxaflor, chlorpyrifos, pyridaphenthioneand isoprocarb) could be used to control BPH. Among them, pymetrozine had the worst short-term effectiveness and the best persistence and obvious bioactivity against different-stage BPH except eggs. Dinotefuran, nitenpyram, clothianidin and cycloxaprid showed good performance in short-term effectiveness and persistence, and the former three were effective to different stages of BPH. Sulfoxaflor had good bioactivity and short-term effectiveness, whose persistence was shorter than that of neonicotinoid insecticides. Either chlorpyrifos or pyridaphenthione could be applied alone or mixed with other insecticides to control BPH. The former one was suitable to cope with the BPH outbreak threat, because it showed the best short-term effectiveness. The bioactivity of isoprocarb was weaker than the neonicotinoids, but its short-term effectiveness was better, which could be used to mix with pymetrozine for pest control. Moreover, three insecticides such as spinetoram, abamectin, emamectin benzoate normally used to control lepidopteran pests also exerted the promising activities against BPH. However, other seven insecticides such as imidacloprid, buprofenzin and thiamethoxam were not appropriate for controlling BPH anymore.
引文
[1]程遐年,吴进才,马飞.褐飞虱研究与防治.北京:中国农业出版社,2003:1-37.Chen X N,Wu J C,Ma F.Brown planthopper:occurrence and control.Beijing:China Agricultural Press,2003:1-37.(in Chinese)
    [2]Gurr G M,Liu J,Read D M Y,Catindig J L A,Cheng JA,Lan L P,Heong L K.Parasitoids of Asian rice planthopper(Hemiptera:Delphacidae)pests and prospects for enhancing biological control by ecological engineering.Ann Appl Biol,2011,158(2):149-76.
    [3]李汝铎,丁锦华,胡国文,苏德明.褐飞虱及其种群管理.上海:复旦大学出版社,1996:239-255.Li R D,Ding J H,Hu G W,Su D M.The Brown Planthopper and Its Population Management.Shanghai:Fudan University Press,1996:239-255.(in Chinese)
    [4]Zhang X,Liu X,Zhu F,Li J,You H,Lu P.Field evolution of insecticide resistance in the brown planthopper(Nilaparvata lugens St?l)in China.Crop Prot,2014,58:61-6.
    [5]廖世纯,韦桥现,黄所生,黄立飞,黎柳锋.16种杀虫剂对稻飞虱的田间防治效果.中国农学通报,2008(9):345-347.Liao S C,Wei Q X,Huang S S,Huang L F,Li L F.The control effect of 16 insecticides against Nilaparvata lugens.Chin Agric Sci Bull,2008(9):345-347.(in Chinese with English abstract)
    [6]刘叙杆,赵兴华,王彦华,韦锦捷,沈晋良,孔健,曹明章,周威君,罗才宏.褐飞虱对氟虫腈和新烟碱类药剂的抗性动态变化.中国水稻科学,2010,24(1):73-80.Liu X G,Zhao X H,Wang Y H,Wei J J,Shen J L,Kong J,Cao M Z,Zhou W J,Luo C H.Dynamic changes of resistance to fipronil and neonicotinoid insecticides in brown planthopper,Nilaparvata lugens(Homoptera:Delphacidae).Chin J Rice Sci,2010,24(1):73-80.(in Chinese with English abstract)
    [7]于福强,黄耀师,苏州,武恩明,王徵,于春睿.新颖杀虫剂氟啶虫胺腈.农药,2013,10:753-755.Yu F Q,Huang Y S,Su Z,Wu E M,Wang H,Yu C R.Anovel insecticides sulfoxaflor.Agrochemicals,2013,10:753-755.(in Chinese with English abstract)
    [8]刘康成,刘文彬,徐嫣,梁正坤.20%呋虫胺SG防治稻褐飞虱田间药效研究.农业灾害研究,2013(9):18-20.Liu K C,Liu W B,Xu Y,Liang Z S.Research on field efficacy of 20%dinotefuran SG for contrilling brown planthopper.J Agric Catastrophol,2013(9):18-20.(in Chinese with English abstract)
    [9]张小磊,李建洪,朱福兴,周锋.烯啶虫胺和阿维菌素及其复配药剂对褐飞虱的田间防效.湖北农业科学,2013,17:4110-4112.Zhang X L,Li J B,Zhu F X,Zhou F.Control effect of nitenpyram,avermectin and their mixture to brown planthopper,Nilaparvata lugens.Hubei Agric Sci,2013,17:4110-4112.(in Chinese with English abstract)
    [10]仇是胜,柏亚罗,顾林玲.氟啶虫酰胺的研究开发及市场前景.现代农药,2014(5):6-11.Qiu S S,Bai Y L,Gu L L.Researche development and market prospece of flonicamid.Mod Agochem,2014(5):6-11.(in Chinese with English abstract)
    [11]刘其全,邱良妙,林仁魁,占志雄.10种杀虫剂对水稻稻飞虱的田间药效与评价.现代农药,2016(2):50-53.Liu Q Q,Qiu L M,Lin R K,Zhan Z X.Field efficacy and appraisal of various insecticides on rice planthopper.Mod Agochem,2016(2):50-53.(in Chinese with English abstract)
    [12]肖汉祥,李燕芳,张扬,廖永林,张振飞.烯啶虫胺对稻飞虱室内毒力测定及田间药效评价试验.现代农药,2013(4):45-48.Xiao H X,Li Y F,Zhang Y,Liao Y L,Zhang Z F.Toxicity tests and field effect trials of nitenpyram against rice planthopper.Mod Agochem,2013(4):45-48.(in Chinese with English abstract)
    [13]汪爱娟,李阿根,张舟娜.呋虫胺等几种新药剂防治水稻稻飞虱与黑尾叶蝉药效试验.江西农业学报,2015(3):53-55.Wang A J,Li A G,Zhang Z N.Control effects of dinotefuran and several new chemicals against rice planthopper and Nephotettix bipunctatus in paddy field.Acta Agric Jiangxi,2015(3):53-55.(in Chinese with English abstract)
    [14]朱昌稳.不同剂量20%呋虫胺SG对水稻褐飞虱的防效.安徽农业科学,2014,16:5012-5013,5141.Zhu Z W.Control effect of different doses of20%cefuroxime insect amine SG on rice BPH(brown palnthopper).J Anhui Agric Sci,2014,16:5012-5013,5141.(in Chinese with English abstract)
    [15]张洪玉,吴清阳,张芝平,毕强,董建生,施顺发,叶振君.环氧虫啶的合成新工艺.世界农药,2014(6):21-24.Zhang H Y,Wu Q Y,Zhang Z P,Bi Q,Dong J S,Shi SF,Ye Z J.New technology of cycloxaprid synthesis.World Pestic,2014(6):21-24.(in Chinese)
    [16]刘萍,徐海燕,张芝平,施顺发,袁静,陈杰.环氧虫啶对褐飞虱毒力的温度效应.现代农药,2014(2):13-14.Liu P,Xu H Y,Zhang Z P,Shi S F,Yuan J,Chen J.Temperature effect on virulence of cycloxaprid aganist Nilaparvata lugens.Mod Agochem,2000(3):114-117.(in Chinese with English abstract)
    [17]农业部农药检定所.2016农药登记产品信息汇编.北京:中国农业出版社,2016:25-1124.Institute for the Control of Agrochemicals.2016Information Compilation of Pesticide Registration Products.Beijing:China Agricultural Press,2016:25-1124.(in Chinese)
    [18]中华人民共和国农业部.农药室内生物测定试验准则:杀虫剂第11部分.稻茎浸渍法.NY/T 1154.11-2008.Ministry of Agriculture,the People’s Republic of China.The People’s Republic of China Agriculture Industry Standard.Guideline for Laboratory Bioassay of Pesticides part 11:Rice Stem-dipping Method.NY/T1154.11-2008.(in Chinese)
    [19]Tang Q Y,Zhang C X.Data processing system(DPS)software with experimental design,statistical analysis and data mining developed for use in entomological research.Insect Sci,2013,20(2):254-260.
    [20]王鹏,甯佐苹,张帅,蒋田田,谭利蓉,董嵩,高聪芬.我国主要稻区褐飞虱对常用杀虫剂的抗性监测.中国水稻科学,2013(2):191-197.Wang p,Ning Z P,Zhang S,Jiang T T,Tan L R,Dong S,Gao C F.Resistance monitoring to conventional insecticides in brown planthopper,Nilaparvata lugens(Hemiptera:Delphacidae)in main rice growing regions in China.Chin J Rice Sci,2013(2):191-197.(in Chinese with English abstract)
    [21]张帅,邵振润,李永平.2013年全国农业有害生物抗药性监测结果及科学用药建议.中国植保导刊,2014,34(3):55-58.Zhang S,Shao Z Y,Li Y P.Monitoring results of insecticide resistance of agricultural pests in China(2013)and suggestions for scientific use of insecticide.Chin Plant Prot,2014,34(3):55-58.(in Chinese)
    [22]张帅.2017年全国农业有害生物抗药性监测结果及科学用药建议.中国植保导刊,2018,38(4):52-56.Zhang S.Monitoring results of insecticide resistance of agricultural pests in China 2017 and suggestions for scientific use of insecticide.Chin Plant Prot,2018,38(4):52-56.(in Chinese)
    [23]王彦华,陈进,沈晋良,高聪芬,黄悦,张久双,李文红,周威君.防治褐飞虱的高毒农药替代药剂的室内筛选及交互抗性研究.中国水稻科学,2008,22(5):519-526.Wang Y H,Chen J,Shen J L,Gao C F,Huang Y,Zhang JS,Li W H,Zhou W J.Laboratory screening and cross-resistance analysis of alternative insecticides for highly-toxic pesticides for controlling brown planthop pers,Nilaparvata lugens.Chin J Rice Sci,2008,22(5):519-526.(in Chinese with English abstract)
    [24]林仁魁,邹华娇,吴德飞.氟啶虫胺腈对褐飞虱的田间防治效果.农药,2012(8):619-620.Lin R K,Zhou H J,Wu D F.Field efficacy of sulfoxafl or240 g/L SC against Nilaparvata lugens(St?l).Agrochemicals,2012(8):619-620.(in Chinese with English abstract)
    [25]夏华兴,陈明亮,刘维新,王健生.氟啶虫胺腈与乙基多杀菌素混用防治水稻迁飞性害虫田间药效试验.现代农药,2013(3):52-53,56.Xia H X,Chen M L,Liu W X,Wang J S.Field effect trials on the mixture of sulfoxaflor and spinetoram against rice migratory pests.Mod Agochem,2013(3):52-53,56.(in Chinese with English abstract)
    [26]Wu S F,Zeng B,Zheng C,Mu X C,Zhang Y,Hu J,Zhang S,Gao C F,Shen,J L.The evolution of insecticide resistance in the brown planthopper(Nilaparvata lugens St?l)of China in the period 2012-2016.Sci Rep,2018,8(1):4586.
    [27]吴春梅,何木兰,石丙楼,余兵,周爱萍.50%氟啶虫酰胺水分散粒剂防治水稻稻飞虱田间药效试验.安徽农学通报,2016(6):92,131.Wu C M,He M L,Shi B L,Yu B,Zhou A P.Field efficacy of 50%sulfoxafl SC against Nilaparvata lugens.Anhui Agric Sci Bull,2016(6):92,131.(in Chinese)
    [28]Zhang X,Liao X,Mao K,Zhang K X,Hu W,Li J H.Insecticide resistance monitoring and correlation analysis of insecticides in field populations of the brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens(St?l)in China2012-2014.Pestic Biochem Physiol,2016,132:13-20.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700