财政分权、人力资本与高质量增长

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Fiscal Decentralization, Human Capital and High Quality Growth 作者：高春亮 ; 李善同 英文作者：Gao Chunliang;Li Shantong; 关键词：财政分权 ; 人力资本 ; 高质量增长 英文关键词：Fiscal Decentralization;;Human Capital;;High Quality Growth 中文刊名：财政研究 英文刊名：Public Finance Research 机构：南京财经大学;国务院发展研究中心发展战略和区域经济研究部; 出版日期：2019-09-05 出版单位：财政研究 年：2019 期：09 基金：国家自然科学基金面上项目“人力资本视角下的城市增长与创新集中研究:微观机制和宏观政策”(71774076)资助;国家自然科学基金重点项目“全球价值链视角下的国内区域分工与市场一体化研究”(71733003)资助 语种：中文; 页：23-34 页数：12 CN：11-1077/F ISSN：1003-2878 分类号：F812.7;F249.27;F127

摘要

人力资本是高质量增长的关键要素。文章建立人力资本积累函数,探讨财政分权、人力资本积累、增长质量提升的微观机制,使用2003-2016年272个城市样本进行实证研究:固定效应模型表明财政分权的配置机制对经济增长的积极影响超过竞争机制的负面影响,人力资本的增长贡献表明财政分权有利于高质量增长;内生性和稳健性检验均支持这一结论;中介效应检验表明配置机制对人力资本的正向影响超过竞争机制的负面影响,财政分权程度越高,越有利于人力资本积累,增长质量也更高。结论表明财政分权提高了增长质量,但更有利于人力资本高回报地区的高质量增长。
        Human capital is the key factor of high quality growth. This paper establishes the accumulation function of human capital, and explores the micro-mechanism of fiscal decentralization, human capital accumulation and the improvement of growth quality, taking 272 cities from 2003 to 2016 as the sample. Fixed-effect model shows that the positive impact of fiscal decentralization on economic growth exceeds the negative impact of competition mechanism. The contribution of human capital growth shows that fiscal decentralization is conducive to improving the quality of growth; both endogenous and robust tests support this conclusion; the intermediary effect test shows that the positive impact of human capital allocation mechanism exceeds the negative impact of competition mechanism, indicating that the higher the degree of fiscal decentralization is, the more conducive to the accumulation of human capital, and then to the improvement of growth quality. The conclusion shows that fiscal decentralization improves the growth quality, but is more conducive to the high-quality growth of regions with high returns on human capital.

引文

[1] Anand,S.&Ravallion,M.. Human Development in Poor Countries:On the Role of Private Incomes and Public Services. Journal of Economic Perspectives,Vol.7,No.1,1993:pp.133-150.
    [2] Tientao,A.,Legros,D.&Pichery,M. C.. Technology Spillover and TFP Growth:A Spatial Durbin Model. International Economics,Vol.145,May 2016:pp.21-31.
    [3]Becker,G. S.. Human Capital[M]. New York:NBER,1964.
    [4] Benhabib,J.&Spiege,M. M.. The Role of Human Capital in Economic Development Evidence from Aggregate Cross-Country Data.Journal of Monetary Economics,Vol. 34,No.2,October 1994:pp.143-173.
    [5] Brueckner,J. K.,Thisse,J-F.&Zenou,Y.. Why is Central Paris Rich and Downtown Detroit Poor? An Amenity-Based Theory. European Economic Review,Vol. 43,No.1,January 1999:pp. 91-107
    [6] Clark,T. N.,Lloyd,R.,Wong,K. K.,&Jain,P.. Amenities Drive Urban Growth. Journal of Urban Affairs,Vol.24,No.5,2002:pp.493-515.
    [7] Christoffersen,S.&Sarkissian,S.. City Size and Fund Performance. Journal of Financial Economics,Vol. 92,No.2,May 2009:pp. 252-275.
    [8] Cuaresma,J. C.,Lutz,W.&Sanderson,W.. Is the Demographic Dividend an Education Dividend? Demography,Vol.51,No.1,February 2013:pp. 299-315.
    [9] Durmaz,S. B.. Analyzing the Quality of Place:Creative Clusters in Soho and Beyo?lu. Journal of Urban Design,Vol.20,No.1,2015:pp. 93-124.
    [10] Florida,R.. Competing in the Age of Talent:Quality of Place and the New Economy. R. K. Mellon-Foundation:Report,2000.
    [11] Gervais,M.,Livshits,I.&Meh,C.. Uncertainty and the Specificity of Human Capital. Economic Theory,Vol.143,No.1,November 2008:pp. 469-498.
    [12] Johanna,V.. The Two Faces of R&D and Human Capital:Evidence from Western European Regions. Regional Science,Vol.94,No.3,August 2013:pp. 525-551.
    [13] Lazear,E. P.. Firm-Specific Human Capital:A Skill-Weights Approach[J]. Journal of Political Economy,2009,117(5):914-940.
    [14] Manca,F.. The Farthest Need the Best. Human Capital Composition and Development-Specific Economic Growth. University of Barcelona,Research Institute of Applied Economics Working Paper IR11/017,2011.
    [15] Olfert,M. R.,Jelinski,M.,Zikos,D.&Campbell,J.. Human Capital Drift up the Urban Hierarchy:Veterinarians in Western Canada. The Annals of Regional Science,Vol. 49,N0.2,October 2012:pp. 551-570.
    [16] Sanroma,E.,Ramos,R.&Simon,H.. How Relevant is the Origin of Human Capital for Immigrant Wages? Evidence From Spain.Journal of Applied Economics,Vol.18,No.1,2015:pp. 49-172.
    [17] Scott,A. J.. Jobs or Amenities? Destination Choices of Migrant Engineers in the USA. Papers in Regional Science,Vol. 89,No.1,March 2010:pp.43-63.
    [18] Teixeira,A. A. C.&Queirós,A.S.S.. Economic Growth,Human Capital and Structural Change:A Dynamic Panel Data Analysis.Research Policy,Vol.45,No.8,2016:pp. 1636-1648.
    [19]傅勇.财政分权、政府治理与非经济性公共物品供给[J].经济研究,2010,45(08):4-15+65.
    [20]江飞涛,李晓萍.直接干预市场与限制竞争:中国产业政策的取向与根本缺陷[J].中国工业经济,2010(09):26-36.
    [21]纪志宏,纪敏,赵奕然.产能过剩的衡量与原因分析——一个文献综述[J].新金融评论,2017(01):73-95.
    [22]高春亮.人力资本积累、变现与城市规模[J].南京大学学报,2014,51(03):16-23.
    [23]高琳.分权与民生:财政自主权影响公共服务满意度的经验研究[J].经济研究,2012,47(07):86-98.
    [24]郭月梅,欧阳洁.地方政府财政透明、预算软约束与非税收入增长[J].财政研究,2017(07):73-88.
    [25]韩华为,苗艳青.地方政府卫生支出效率核算及影响因素实证研究:以中国31个省份面板数据为依据的DEA-Tobit分析[J].财经研究,2010,36(05):4-15+39.
    [26]刘建民,陈霞,吴金光.财政分权、地方政府竞争与环境污染——基于272个城市数据的异质性与动态效应分析[J].财政研究,2015(09):36-43.
    [27]罗伟卿.财政分权是否影响了公共教育供给——基于理论模型与地级面板数据的研究[J].财经研究,2010,36(11):39-50.
    [28]亓寿伟,俞杰,陈雅文.中国基础教育支出效率及制度因素的影响——基于局部前沿效率方法的分析[J].财政研究,2016(06):103-112.
    [29]单豪杰.中国资本存量K的再估算:1952-2006年[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2008,25(10):17-31.
    [30]世界银行.重塑世界经济地理[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2009.
    [31]苏志庆,陈银娥.知识贸易、技术进步与经济增长[J].经济研究,2014,49(08):133-145+157.
    [32]张晏,龚六堂.分税制改革、财政分权与中国经济增长[J].经济学(季刊),2005,5(01):75-108.
    [33]张曙霄,戴永安.异质性、财政分权与城市经济增长——基于面板分位数回归模型的研究[J].金融研究,2012(01):33-39.
    [34]周黎安.中国地方官员的晋升锦标赛模式研究[J].经济研究,2007(07):36-50.
    [35]周亚虹,宗庆庆,陈曦明.财政分权体制下地市级政府教育支出的标尺竞争[J].经济研究,2013(11):127-160.
    [36]朱平芳,徐大丰.中国城市人力资本的估算[J].经济研究,2007(09):84-95.
    (1)受篇幅所限，公式推导过程略。