基于启动刺激和目标刺激的不同呈现时间下冲突加工对情绪的影响

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：The effect of conflict processing on emotion at different start-up times: based on start-up conditions and target condition reflected in different time 作者：应亮 ; 周强 英文作者：YING Liang;ZHOU Qiang;Department of Students Management, School of Renji College, Wenzhou Medical University;Department of Psychology, School of Mental Health, Wenzhou Medical University; 关键词：冲突加工 ; 情绪启动 ; SOA ; 启动词的持续时间 英文关键词：conflict processing;;emotional initiation;;SOA;;duration of start-up words 中文刊名：温州医科大学学报 英文刊名：Journal of Wenzhou Medical University 机构：温州医科大学仁济学院学工部;温州医科大学精神医学学院心理系; 出版日期：2019-03-25 出版单位：温州医科大学学报 年：2019 期：03 基金：浙江省自然科学基金资助项目(LY15H090017) 语种：中文; 页：20-26+31 页数：8 CN：33-1386/R ISSN：2095-9400 分类号：B842.6;R338

摘要

目的:关注不同的时间下冲突加工如何影响情绪。方法:采用Stroop范式和情绪启动范式;35名在校大学生,以被试内重复测量设计进行实验。结果:启动条件和效价之间的交互作用显著(P<0.01);SOA为800 ms时的反应时为(617.0±73.4)ms,明显小于SOA是400 ms时的反应时(708.4±105.8)ms;当SOA为400 ms时,不同的启动词持续时间水平之间差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),随着持续时间的增加反应时随之增加,而SOA为800 ms时3个持续时间之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:冲突加工对后续情绪产生消极影响,不同SOA条件对目标刺激效价判断的反应时产生不同的影响;SOA是400 ms且持续时间为400 ms时,冲突的启动效应更加明显。
        Objective: To explore how conflict processing affects emotion at different start-up times.Methods: Using the Stroop paradigm and the emotion initiation paradigm repeated measures design within the subject were experimented with 35 undergraduate students. Results: The results of the data show that the interaction between start-up conditions and potency was significant(P<0.01); the reaction time when SOA was 800 ms[(617.0±73.4) ms] that was significantly smaller than the response time when SOA was 400 ms [(708.4±105.8)ms]; when SOA was 400 ms, the difference between the three duration levels was significant(P<0.01). The response time increased with the increase of duration, and no significant difference between the three duration was found(P>0.05) when the SOA was 800 ms. Conclusion: Conflict processing has negative effect on follow-up emotions, and different SOA conditions have different effects on the response to target stimulus titers; when SOA is 400 ms and duration is 400 ms, the start-up effect of conflict is more obvious.

引文

[1]刘烨,付秋芳,傅小兰.认知与情绪的交互作用[J].科学通报, 2009, 54(18):2783-2796.
    [2]马建苓,刘畅,符明秋.情绪影响冲突加工的认知神经机制[J].心理科学进展, 2017, 25(1):49-58.
    [3]KORNBLUM S, HASBROUCQ T, OSMAN A. Dimensional overlap:cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility-a model and taxonomy[J]. Psychol Rev, 1990, 97(2):253-270.
    [4]KLAUER K C, MUSCH J. Affective priming:Findings and theories[M]. Mahwah, N.J.:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,2003:287-288.
    [5]MURPHY S T, ZAJONC R B. Affect, cognition, and awareness:affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures[J]. J Pers Soc Psychol, 1993, 64(5):723-739.
    [6]BOWER G H, FORGAS J P. Affect, memory, and social cognition[J]. J Pers Soc Psychol, 1987, 53(1):53-60.
    [7]智承.情绪启动和语义启动的比较研究综述[J].吉林省教育学院学报, 2011, 27(1):150-151.
    [8]王一牛,周立明,罗跃嘉.汉语情感词系统的初步编制及评定[J].中国心理卫生杂志, 2008, 22(8):608-612.
    [9]施亮,吴晓刚,李乐源,等.积极还是消极?冲突加工的信号作用[J].心理技术与应用, 2016, 4(4):204-208.
    [10]FRITZ J, DREISBACH G. The time course of the aversive conflict signal[J]. Exp Psychol, 2015, 62(1):30-39.
    [11]张钦,李小花.不同SOA条件下的情感启动效应研究[J].应用心理学, 2005, 11(2):154-159.